Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Tonight Show smackdown

June 25, 2007 |  8:44 am

No, it won't be Rosie O'Donnell facing off with Donald Trump. But late-night TV host Jay Leno will get the chance tonight to probe a breach between John Edwards and Elizabeth Edwards on the issue of gay marriage.

Edwards_jhr8v5nc While in San Francisco Sunday to help kick off the city's annual gay pride parade, the wife of the Democratic presidential contender told reporters she supports same-sex betrothals. She also noted that her husband does not: he backs civil unions for gays, but not marriages.

The couple link up today in Burbank to appear on the Leno show and, while it isn't his job to emulate Tim Russert, we'll be surprised if Jay doesn't broach the matter. It's actually been a dicey one for Edwards; Bob Shrum, the longtime --- and often controversial --- Democratic political consultant wrote in his recently published memoir that the former North Carolina senator once told him he was uncomfortable with gays.

Elizabeth Edwards took a nod toward that anecdote Sunday, saying, "John has been pretty clear about it, that he is very conflicted (about gay marriage). He has a deeply held belief against any form of discrimination, but that’s up against his being raised in the 1950s in a rural southern town."

-- Don Frederick

Photo: John and Elizabeth Edwards; Credit: Peter Kramer/Getty Images


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The epitome of hypocrisy. It never ceases to amaze me how these "liberated thinkers" continue to refer to sodamite marriage as an issue of non-discrimination, when any honest reader sees the working contradiction from the onset. While stating that they don’t discriminate on the one hand while they openly discriminate against the transcendent definition of the covenant relationship in and of itself on the other. The last time I checked, “contradiction” in any argumentation on any topic, is self refutation. If these "liberated" thinkers weren’t such sorrowful slaves to their fallacious assumptions, indeed it would be laughable.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives