L.A. Unleashed

All things animal in Southern
California and beyond

« Previous Post | L.A. Unleashed Home | Next Post »

California Assembly votes to close loophole on fur labeling

Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, D-San Francisco, looks over a vote tally after a measure 







she co-authored, with Assemblyman Ted Lieu, D-Torrence, concerning the labeling 







of fur on garments, was approved by the Assembly on a 46-7 vote

Coats, wraps and other clothes that are made with animal fur would need to have special labels in California under legislation adopted Monday by the state Assembly.

Lawmakers voted 46-7 to close a loophole in federal law that allows many fur products to go unlabeled. Current law requires labels only for garments that have $150 or more worth of animal fur.

The bill now goes to the state Senate for consideration. If it's signed into law, California would become the sixth state to impose the labeling requirement, joining Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts and Wisconsin.

"I think there is an expectation that if clothing isn't labeled as real fur it must be fake, but this isn't always the case," bill author Fiona Ma said in a statement after the vote. "People have a right to know if they are buying raccoon dog or a polyester blend."

A raccoon dog is a canine species from Asia.

The bill by the San Francisco Democrat would require that all garments containing fur are labeled with the type of animal and the country of origin. Currently, manufacturers avoid labeling requirements by using cheap fur from raccoon dogs and other animals raised in foreign factories, Ma said.

Critics argue that the labels would burden retailers. Assemblyman Chuck DeVore (R-Irvine) said the measure would lead to added regulations and fines for retailers. He said consumers should instead take recourse in the courts.

"I believe, and based on current civil code, you can in fact bring a lawsuit if something is said to be one thing and it is really something else and you suffer harm," DeVore said during the floor debate.

-- Associated Press

Stay up-to-date on animal news: Follow Unleashed on Facebook and Twitter.

Photo: Assemblywoman Fiona Ma (D-San Francisco) looks over a vote tally after the fur-labeling measure she co-authored with Assemblyman Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) was approved by the state Assembly on April 5. Credit: Rich Pedroncelli / Associated Press

 
Comments () | Archives (4)

The comments to this entry are closed.

"Critics argue that the labels would burden retailers. Assemblyman Chuck DeVore (R-Irvine) said the measure would lead to added regulations and fines for retailers. He said consumers should instead take recourse in the courts."

Mr. Devore, individuals should not have to resort to lawsuits after the fact to ensure that merchants do not lie to their customers. Incidentally exactly how much free time and extra cash do you think most people have to spend on such suits, anyway? Out of touch with reality much?

I'm so glad these bumbling idiots have time on their agenda to weigh in on fur labels. Our economy is tanking, no jobs, doctors informing patients they are closing shop, passage of pot on the ballad and everyone running for reelection. LA Mayor announcing suspending services 2 days a week...Are their any normal people left in Sacramento? Brown much too busy to challenge the health bill...the governator must be out of town or seeking a new role in Hollywood. You're all fired.

The ANIMALS who suffer harm so unaware consumers can have a bit of fur trim can't sue for damages. Raccoon dogs are often skinned alive in China. I'll be so proud of CA when this bill is finalized.

Good! Fur is old school and cruel anyway.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video






Pet Adoption Resources


Recent Posts


Archives