L.A. Unleashed

All things animal in Southern
California and beyond

« Previous Post | L.A. Unleashed Home | Next Post »

Rush Limbaugh incurs the wrath of hunting rights groups for supporting the Humane Society in PSAs

Limbaugh When conservative talk-radio icon Rush Limbaugh decided to record a series of public service announcements for the Humane Society of the United States, many animal lovers on both sides of the political aisle applauded. 

After all, the topics Limbaugh spoke about in the PSAs, like opposing dogfighting, hardly seemed controversial.  "Opposition to cruelty and the embrace of the human-animal bond are universal values," Humane Society president Wayne Pacelle wrote, adding that his group's aims were "in step with those of all good people" regardless of political affiliation.

But a coalition of 28 hunters' rights groups are furious with Limbaugh for aiding and abetting the group that, as U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance president Bud Pidgeon puts it, "is the number one opponent of sportsmen in America today."  The groups, which include the Sportsmen's Alliance and Ducks Unlimited, fired off an angry missive to Limbaugh calling on him to sever all ties with the Humane Society. 

"It is our hope that once Mr. Limbaugh hears from American sportsmen and women he will understand how his endorsement aids [the Humane Society] in its quest to to destroy American freedoms such as hunting, fishing and trapping," Pidgeon said. 

Despite the fact that the PSAs don't address hunting or fishing at all, the Sportsmen's Alliance says Limbaugh's allegiance will be exploited for financial gain by Pacelle's group.  The Humane Society, according to Pidgeon, "uses seemingly harmless campaigns like the ones endorsed by Mr. Limbaugh to raise funds for the organization to advance its controversial mission." 

For his part, Pacelle says he's "embarrassed" for the hunters' groups for politicizing animal welfare causes like the anti-dogfighting campaign.  "I think the folks that are criticizing it are unbelievably knee-jerk -- I guess they want to provide comfort to dogfighters? It just doesn't make any sense.... There are certain things that civil society should agree on," Pacelle told the Washington Times.

From the Washington Times:

Scott Sutherland, director of governmental affairs for Ducks Unlimited, which has 630,000 members, said, "Supporting HSUS implies an endorsement of an anti-sportsman agenda."

In their letter, the groups say that Mr. Limbaugh's collaboration amounts to "implied endorsements" for the Humane Society that are "a real coup for their cause."

"With America's most prominent conservative spokesman on board, they have the opportunity to make inroads into a new cross section of our country. You are helping them to mainstream their image in the minds of reasonable people. Your collaboration furthers the anti-hunting and anti-fishing agenda of HSUS, which will undermine the great success of conservation and threatens the economies of small towns and rural states across our nation."

As for Limbaugh, he's remained uncharacteristically mum on the topic.  In a recent interview with Fox News' Greta von Susteren, the pundit played dumb about the country's most prominent animal protection group:

VAN SUSTEREN: Who do you admire and why?

LIMBAUGH: In what, in politics?

VAN SUSTEREN: Anything -- politics, theater, music, anything.

LIMBAUGH: Oh, gee! You know, this is when I have brain freezes. It's like asking me what my favorite movie is. Who do I admire and why? Well, you know, I...

VAN SUSTEREN: You like the Humane Society.

LIMBAUGH: Who?

VAN SUSTEREN: The Humane Society.

(LAUGHTER)

LIMBAUGH: Well, now, you're getting into politics. ...

Environmental blog Ecorazzi speculates that opposition from the hunters' groups may be getting to Limbaugh:

Hmmm…one thing I thought we were supposed to take away from these PSAs that respect of animals is neither left or right — but just good, common sense? If Limbaugh won't even back up his support of HSUS in an interview, could it be that he’s feeling the pressure?

So far, no comment from Limbaugh's beloved cat, Punkin -- but can it be long before even she enters this heated political fray?

-- Lindsay Barnett

Photo: Rich Arden / Associated Press

 
Comments () | Archives (7)

The comments to this entry are closed.

It seems self evident that the HSUS "one small step at a time" strategy seems to be working for them... Prop #2 was a tremendous success.... and we'll see what the next elections brings. No wonder sportsmen are worried... But make no mistake -- the goals of PeTA, ALF, ELF, and HSUS are one and the same. They only differ in their strategies.

It's ridiculous to equate Rush Limbaugh's endorsement of the HSUS anti-dogfighting campaign with the end of all hunting. First of all , these two topics are completely unrelated. Second of all, while I'm sure the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance and Ducks Unlimited are eager for any opportunity to demonize the HSUS, the organization's hunting campaigns focus on issues like canned hunts and poaching. These are areas that have broad support from the public, including mang hunters.

Never thought I would say this, but Thank you Mr. Limbaugh!

Rush has incurred more than the wrath of sportsmen. I know for sure he has heard from the National Cattlemen's Beef Assn, numerous state cattlemen and dairy organizations, the American Quarter Horse Assn, to name a few. The Agriculture, the sportsmen, and the responsible animal breeders in this country know the agenda of the HSUS is the extinction of our domeatic animals. We know because they back all the legislation that takes away our rights to own and breed animals.

The people that are upset with Rush are also opposed to dog fighting. Inspite of his comments, Mr. Pacelle knows this, too. The problem here is that Rush was duped into believing that HSUS is an honorable organization. Mr. Pacelle is insulting our intelligence by acting as if the issue with Rush has anything to do with dog fighting. It is very arrogant and condescending of him to insinuate that this has anything to do with dog fighting. The issue is that Rush, by doing a PSA on dogfighting, lends credence to an organization that deserves no credence. There are plenty of organizations for which Rush can do PSA's on dogfighting and lend credence that are much more deserving. American Humane, for example. At least they have not falsely claimed to be caring for Michael Vick's dogs and collect money for those dogs under false pretenses, nor have they hired anyone such as JP Goodwin (a former member of the terrorist group ALF), nor have they lied about the Canadian Seafood Boycott, as HSUS has. If Rush wants to do PSA's about dogfighting, I'm sure he would receive excellent support from the very groups that are upset with him in this article - as long as he didn't associate or support a group such as HSUS. Mr. Pacelle, please don't insult my intelligence by trying to make this an issue of dogfighting - you know better and so do the rest of us.

The Biggest Problem for Rush right now is a toss up. Lose listeners hand over fist or lose sponsors? In siding with HSUS ( look up Wayne's comment " one generation and out" in regards to OUR pets) is that he totally snubbed his nose at a good portion of his listeners, many of his sponsors and goes against everything he's preached over the years ( remember, he's into less gov't, not more, HSUS want MORE laws to restrict people's actions).
Perhaps if he looked into what HSUS actually stood for before recording the PSA's , he never would have recorded them. lets hope this costly lesson is well learned by him.

"There are plenty of organizations for which Rush can do PSA's on dogfighting..."

I guess the question is, was Rush ever approached by any other organizations to do a PSA on dogfighting?

The answer is probably no.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video






Pet Adoption Resources


Recent Posts


Archives