L.A. Unleashed

All things animal in Southern
California and beyond

« Previous Post | L.A. Unleashed Home | Next Post »

Britain's Kennel Club announces sweeping reforms

Bulldog

Britain's Kennel Club (KC) has announced major reforms to breed standards and accepted breeding practices for purebred dogs. The changes come in response to concerns (raised, at least in part, by filmmaker Jemima Harrison's documentary "Pedigree Dogs Exposed") that purebred dogs suffer from serious health problems as a result of breeding for the show ring.

The KC explained the rationale for the reforms in a statement:

The breed standards -- the picture in words that describes each breed of dog - - have been revised so that they will not include anything that could in any way be interpreted as encouraging features that might prevent a dog from breathing, walking and seeing freely. This will help to prevent the practice of exaggeration, where features that are perceived to be desirable, such as a short muzzle or loose skin, are made more prominent by breeders, and which can have detrimental effects on a dog's health.

The 209 breeds recognized by the KC will see their standards change as a result of the reforms.  Prominent among the affected breeds is the bulldog, which was cited as one of the breeds most prone to genetic disorders in Harrison's documentary. The BBC reports:

In future, the bulldog must be leaner and will no longer be encouraged to have heavy jowls and deep, overhanging wrinkles in its skin.

Rules now state "skin may be slightly wrinkled," but "must never adversely affect or obscure eyes or nose". Wrinkles which lead to "pinched nostrils" -- potentially affecting breathing -- "are unacceptable and should be heavily penalized".

Other affected breeds include the German Shepherd (whose revised standard notes that an "over long, weak pastern, which would affect a dog's working ability is to be heavily penalized"); the Chow Chow (which "must not have so much coat as to impede activity or cause distress in hot weather"); the Chinese shar-pei (whose revised standard "removes the exaggeration of loose skin folds across the neck, skull and legs"); and the Labrador retriever (whose revised standard "precludes excessive body weight or substance").

Lab
Changes to its breed standard aim to address weight issues in Labrador retrievers.

Groups such as the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) have applauded the KC's decision. "This is something the RSPCA has been calling for and shows recognition that close inbreeding of dogs is not a good idea," the RSPCA's Chief Veterinary Adviser Mark Evans said in a statement released today

But not everyone's cheering. Among the dissenting voices are the parent groups of the affected breeds. The BBC notes that one such group, the British Bulldog Council, "fears the loss of a breed emblematic of defiance and pugnacity":

[British Bulldog Council chairman Robin Searle] told the Times newspaper: "What you'll get is a completely different dog, not a British bulldog."

The new rules will also affect the use of inbreeding (defined by the KC as the breeding of a mother and son, father and daughter, or brother and sister) as a way to lock in desired traits: puppies produced through inbreeding will no longer be registered by the KC, beginning in March. 

Additional regulations require dog show judges to "choose only the healthiest dogs as champions. Any animals at Crufts that show signs of ill-health are to be expelled," according to the BBC.

What do you think about the KC's reforms?  Do they go far enough?  Would you like to see similar reforms implemented in the U.S.?  Let us know in the comments.

-- Lindsay Barnett

Related posts:
BBC announces it won't air Crufts dog show
PETA to USA Network: Don't air Westminster!
Dog show fans to PETA: Leave Westminster alone!
BBC documentarian: "PETA is a bunch of crackpots"
PETA responds to BBC filmmaker's "crackpots" comment

PETA's Vice President: We don't want to take your dog away
Breeder of Westminster winner Uno has a few words for PETA

Top photo:  Bob Bird / For The Times
Bottom photo: Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times

 
Comments () | Archives (6)

The comments to this entry are closed.

It's about time.
I do too applaud the BKC decision, dogs are our wonderful companions, they deserve that and more.
I hope soon the AKC will follow in their steps.
Lets first think of what is more important the health of our beautiful dogs or winning best in show.
Ana

I am all for this, for sure I love to see it in the USA. Seeing how bad some of these breads have become, and the amount of inbreeding is a sad state.

Though I am sure many good breeders don't inbreed their dogs, it would beneficial for the breeds to be healthier.

Only way for that to happen is for standards to change.

Just breed a dog that doesn't bark. Please.

Indeed, the deliberate breeding of purebreds must systematically come to an end. I share my life with a rescued bulldog, and though I love him deeply, the breed is rife with problems. He's had three eye surgeries, his skin is a mess, his hips are going. That's why he was surrended to the pound to begin with.

It's not fair to the dogs because all too often people get these breeds because they are the "in" pet and then when reality sets in, they are as quickly unloaded. And man endure untreated medical conditions because of the vet costs.

It's NOT the dogs that are freaks...it's the ugly animal BREEDERS that are FREAKS!

So why don't they stop the butchering of puppies??? Who in the world decided that Dobermans should have their ears and tails mutilated? Let the dogs be the way they a born!! THAT is the dog! If you don't like it in it's natural state, GET A DIFFERENT DOG!!!


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video






Pet Adoption Resources


Recent Posts


Archives