Wolves back on endangered species list -- for now

From the Associated Press:

BILLINGS, Mont. — Federal wildlife officials said Tuesday they want to remove wolves in the Northern Rockies from the endangered species list — again — by early 2009.

That declaration came on the same day a judge restored the predator’s endangered status, as part of a lawsuit filed by environmentalists. It’s been less than seven months since the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service stripped wolves of federal protection for the first time since 1974.

The decision transferred control over the animals to state game agencies in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana. But after wolves were allowed to be shot on sight across most of Wyoming — and all three states began planning public hunts — U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in July issued an injunction to block the killings.

On Tuesday, Molloy went a step further, restoring the animal’s endangered status. That means the public dispute over wolves in the Rockies will drag on. Ranchers and state wildlife agencies want hunting allowed to curb the wolves’ tendency to prey on livestock. Meanwhile, environmentalists insist the wolf population remains in peril and could crash if the states get their way.

Molloy’s Tuesday order came at the request of federal biologists who acknowledged they had failed to prove the animal had fully recovered from near-decimation last century. Molloy had criticized the federal government’s support for Wyoming’s shoot-on-sight law. And he questioned whether packs of wolves were interbreeding enough to maintain their genetic diversity.

"The judge was pretty clear [we] were going to lose the case if we went forward," said Ed Bangs, wolf recovery coordinator in the Northern Rockies for Fish and Wildlife Service. Bangs said the "quickest way" to shore up the government’s case that wolves are recovered would be to revamp its proposal, then reissue its rule to downgrade wolves’ status in early 2009.

"We’re talking about getting this whole thing done within 4 to 5 months," he said. A Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman, Sharon Rose, later cast doubt on that timeline. Rose said internal deliberations within the Fish and Wildlife Service could stretch out longer than Bangs had anticipated.

"The government is a big entity and it doesn’t always move so fast," she said. An attorney for the environmental groups that had sued over wolves said they would be watching closely. "They’re conceding there are flaws, and if they are hell-bent on delisting and just trying to paper over those major flaws, then we’re almost certain to be back in court challenging it again," said Doug Honnold with Earthjustice. Honnold represented the Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife and 10 other plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

The federal government has spent more than $27 million on wolf recovery efforts in the Northern Rockies. In the mid-1990s, 66 wolves from Canada were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho. Their population has grown rapidly and has spread across an estimated 113,000 square miles. Last month, biologists reported the first dip in that population since the recovery began, from 1,545 animals in 2007 to 1,455 this year.

Photo credit: Associated Press

Comments

[Elizabeth Carroll]

I think protecting the wolves from hunters is very important, since it makes zero sense to kill a species that has only recently recovered. Breeding populations must have a diverse enough pool to remain healthy, and until such time solid proof exists, there should be no hunting.

Wolves that kill livestock must be a case by case situation, since many former government hunters stepped forward years ago stating most cases of reputed predation were sick animals, or animals killed by winter.

Why do hunters need to kill such wonderful animals is beyond me, especially when the current level of hunting technology really negates at true sport.

[Brien Comerford]

Wolves will incessantly be imperiled by inhumane hunters and other wildlife killers. It's mandatory to permanently place them on the endangered list.

[Wolf Lover]

Wolves should be kept on the endangered species lsit for life, and the Bush Administration should stop trying to get them off the endangered species list. The Bush Administration has no right to really take them off without getting the consent of wolf administration groups that are trying to protect them. Hunters and Ranchers only like to hunt for game, and because they think maliciously.

[Toby Bridges]

AGREED...We should keep wolf numbers shot so low that they remain on the endangered species list forever.

And the sportsmen who have footed the bill for the conservation efforts the past hundred years to rebuild deer and elk numbers are already doing that...and the trend is about to escalate.

A whole lot of those unwanted wolves are about to bite the bullet - literally.

Toby Bridges
LOBO Watch
Missoula. MT

PS - We would gladly ship all of our MT wolves to CA...if only we could. Guess we'll just have to shoot 'em!

[missykkk]

the wolves have a right and i understand that but so do the farmers and ranchers, they have to make a living and that living may be the livestock that the wolves are attacking.....Farmers/ ranchers should have rights too and those rights should include protection what is rightly theirs. Yes i agree wolves are beautiful creatures but a beatiful creature can easily be deadly.....if they are eatting livestock and coming close enough to peoples homes to do so they could easily snack on young children... so do you think it is fair for a rancher/ farmer to have to risk their lively hood and their family...how would you feel if your buisness and family were at risk???