Angelina Jolie's baby factory closed for business?

OK! is reporting that Angelina Jolie's womb is no longer open for baby business. Perhaps permanently.

Her last two pregnancies had so many scary complications, she's been advised to wait a long time before getting pregnant again — or maybe not to do it at all.

"Her previous pregnancies ended with emergency cesarean secions," an insider tells OK!. "She's been told that, at the least, she should not get pregnant for a year after her last delivery, and it would be safer if she did not get pregnant, ever."

Emergency? We thought the last one was pretty much planned out.

Not being a biological mom could prove frustrating for Angelina. Remember she told Vanity Fair last year that she loves being pregnant.

"It makes me feel like a woman," she said. "Also, I happen to be with someone who finds pregnancy very sexy."

OK, so buy a nice slinky black dress or some skimpy lingerie. Plan a romantic getaway in the Caribbean. Surely that can make you feel as sexy as being pregnant!

More unnerving than the aforementioned news is the revelation that she is on her way to Ethiopia to adopt yet another baby.

Does Angie need a baby 12-step program? What do you think?

More Angie baby news:

Angelina's breast feeding photos are adorable!

Photo: OK!

Comments

[Sally]

She is the self proclaimed Mia Faro of this generation. She better watch out with Brad and those kids in l0 years. We know what happened to Woody!

[KELLY]

Women do not need to be pregnant to feel more like a "woman". Everything with Jolie is about sex. I think she is a very unbalanced person. She is hardly
someone to be idolized or even respected. She is a "psycho".

[China]

Why do we encourage Angelina Jolie to have more babies, but everyone is down on the Palins for breeding? Seems like a bit of media hypocracy. Or maybe Jolie can adopt Palin's granddaughter, then everyone will be happy.

[brad carter]

angelina jolie hi im brad c . its been my dream to speak to u so will u please please wright me back!

[brad carter]

angelina jolie, u are so wonderfull.. it has always been my dream to talk to you ,, will you please talk to me,, please please wright back..

[GMAB]

GMAB, Liz! Since when has OK! ever gotten anything right about Jolie & Pitt? Jolie's doctor said there was nothing wrong with her during her last pregnancy and that she DID NOT have gestational diabetes. She was on bed rest because she was having twins. Even a complete tool such as yourself should know that one of the major side effects of a diabetic pregnancy is large babies - well over the 8 pound range. Jolie's babies were 5 pounds and just over 5 pounds, which is totally normal for twins born nearly 3 weeks EARLY. Even in diabetic pregnancies that are premature deliveries the babies tend to weigh more in the 6 - 6 1/2 pound range.

All this OK cover demonstrates is that Pitt and Jolie were right not to sell them the pictures of the twins. OK, like Life & Style, Star, In Touch, National Enquirer and US Weekly do nothing but print fictional stories about Jolie and Pitt. For God's sake - in the spring of 2007 OK claimed that Pitt and Jolie were getting married in South Africa and Oprah was throwing the wedding for them. They had details of the nuptials, had all 4 kids walking down the aisle, the guest list, what Jolie was wearing, etc. Since then they've had a number of fake pregnancy and more fake wedding stories.

How someone of your supposed creditials can continue to be hoodwinked by these bogus tabloid stories is beyond me. Why even acknowledge the existence of putrid publications like this? All it does it make you look like you're either an idiot or on their payroll...kind of like your LA Times blogging colleague Tom O'Neil is on the In Touch Weekly payroll. Bottom feeding rag that it is.

[rita]

Please leave Angelina alone...We know that Jennifer Aniston is paying you big bucks to say nasty things about our girl Angelina, but PLEASE enough of this negativity....Ms.
Aniston is soo jealous of her but give Angie some privacy and respect!!!!!!!

[here is the truth]

Why no mention of Brad being as baby crazy as Angelina? Also the physican quoted by OK has never treated Angelina, has a suspended license and just paid 2.5 million in a malpractive lawsuit. OK is lying lying lying.

[C'mon Already]

With film criticism getting fewer column inches than ever, are you really reporting on the state of Ms. Jolie's womb? This is a new low, LA Times.

[Mary]

Does this go under "it is a slow news day" category. This person has never met her, examined her or knows anything about her medical history. Yet, this is reported as a "fact". When this couple goes underground, the news justs gets sillier and sillier. Remember last summer and the ignorant nonesense about her "delivery" or non delivery reported here so regularyly?

So many things about this couple are printed as they don't not have publicists that read this stuff and put out the denials like other folks, that they are easy targets. I like that they don't get down in the mud with the silliness though, it is not worthy of their time.

[Blue]

What is the matter with you people??? Are ya'll that jealous of a woman because she is beautiful, talented and humane that you resort to this kind of cheap and tawdry 'reporting'?
Is Jennifer Aniston on you payroll??
What kind of 'awards insider' is this??
Perhaps you ought to concentrate on reporting on films..and leave the Jolie-Pitts alone.
As for the idiotic accusation by one of the more 'educated' posters...that Ms. Jolie is the 'self-proclaimed Mia Farrow of this generation'..first of all...says who??...second of all...so what??? I guess Ms. Farrow is also 'guilty' somehow because of her humanitrian ideals..
This sick fascination with what Ms. Jolie is and is not doing in terms of her womb is absurd and indecent. It is no business of yours or anyone else's. For heavens sake...if you are not reporting on awards' and film...call yourself what you really are..Just another cheap despicable gossip rag that lives only to insult and expolit those actors you do not understand or for whatever reason..do not care for. I suspect Ms. Aniston fares much better in your 'reporting'

[Kathleen P.]

Mia "Faro"?

Mia "Faro"?

My eyes! Who ARE these people who dare to criticize others when they are so woefully unaware of their own ignorance?

Pay more attention to your own head and what's not in it.

And, Elizabeth, really. Come on. You're better than this.

[suzy]

Compare Jolie to Mia Farrow? ARe you crazy? Mia is amazing. Jolie is a media hog. She collects children like a piece of jewelry. Mia honestly cares about her family. She would rather quit work and take care of her family, unlike JOlie.

as for her unplanned delivery. Are you kidding me? Everyone knows she planned it this way so she could have a tummy tuck at the same time she had delivery. I delivered twins naturally and worked out the entire time. I did not look like her for a long time.

[ALIOU]

Angie, you are very wonderfull ,and i want you to be you against your enemy. all my dream in my life is to meet, and talk to you.

[gena bonds]

Why should we believe a tabloid magazine. There are real news out there, why print lies from a tabloid who knows if they write anything about Angelina they will get attention. She just had twins and is getting ready to shot a new movie. Go and talk about Jen and leave Angie alone. I am sure Jen would welcome the press.

[Mikey]

As usual, it is a slow news day in the USA. Anyhow, LA times should focus more on REAL news stories not about celebrities PERSONAL lives.

[kara]

wow -- referring to a tabloid as a reliable source? quoting it? no wonder the LA Times is a sinking ship.

[JP]

Brangelina are collecting children like other couples collect antiques from the corners of the world. Enough is enough. It is about time people start to talk about the obsurdity of yet another child for them. Two thumbs down to Brangelina and their ever growing collection of children, that they think nothing of moving from house to house, city to city, country to country mutliple times a year.

[Summer Girl]

I rarely click on links about stars, but thought I'd read what everyone has to say. I can't believe people are actually so wrapped up in the lives of people they don't even know. No wonder celebrities think of fans as double-edged swords! Hard to understand how someone would think that Jennifer Aniston would pay publications to write detrimental articles about other stars. Good grief--are you people delusional? These stars are all just PEOPLE. They are not superpeople--they have good and bad points like the rest of us. Unlike the rest of us, they have a lot more money that allows them to adopt babies when they like. Not fair for the many couples who are waiting to adopt, but just the way it is.

[cll]

Mia Farrow adopted without any publicity, while this one orchestrates all her moves w/ the paps. Narcissistic, wacked media-whore.

[oft]

The only reason I clicked on this link was disbelief. The LA Times?! Jolie's "baby factory"?! I can't take this paper seriously anymore. You are either overrun by the trash-minded, or you believe your readers are. Thanks for the notice.

[tory_star1109@hotmail.com]

public please leave her alone! she is a good mum wih children of her own and adopted ones.she is a great mum if she is able to adopt so many kids esp when the world is in chrisis and she is a goodwill ambassidor.she is my role model

[whatever]

OK! should close shop.
stop creating stories!

[LM]

I think a 12 step program for Ms. Joli is an excellent idea. I am sure that her many existing children would love a few minutes of her time. Just a thought.