From the Stacks: 'Bookmen and Their Brothels'
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Photo: Los Angeles Public Library Credit: Carolyn Kellogg/Los Angeles Times |
While we are discussing family research in Bullet of Mystery, the Los Angeles Public Library will present a program on getting started in genealogical research. The free presentation will be from 11 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on Saturday, May 21, 2011.
Folks should gather at the reference desk in the History & Genealogy Department on Lower Level 4. No reservations are necessary for groups of six or less. Larger groups should schedule an appointment at (213) 228-7400. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that L.A. Observed had an item on the reissue of “Los Angeles: A Guide to the City and Its Environs,” a book that is well worth having. The Daily Mirror HQ acquired its copy (formerly the property of Fremont High School--ahem) back in the 1970s and it has provided many hours of entertainment (check out the Chapman South American Chinchilla Farm, 4957 W. 104th St., admission by telephone appointment only). |
|
Yugoslav Proverbs (380) The Truth About Los Angeles (647) Facts You Should Know About California (752) The Word of Satan in the Bible (1307) Hollywood From the Inside (1401)
Other Haldeman-Julius titles with a Los Angeles or California connection are: "Anti-Evolution Strikes California" in "Is Death Inevitable?" by Maynard Shipley (271) "Address at the Grave of Luther Burbank" (724) Edgcumb Pinchon's "Life Among Hollywood's 'Extra' Girls" (755) "How 'Wicked' Is Hollywood?" (1591); which includes "How 'Wicked' is Hollywood?" by H. A. Woodmansee; "Los Angeles -- The Heaven of Bunk-Shooters" by Farnsworth Crowder; "How Aimee Semple McPherson Gets the Kale" by Eric Wolfe; and "Pasadena -- A Charming City, But" by A. C. Senske. A bit of online research shows that the Oviatt Library Special Collections at Cal State Northridge has a nearly complete collection of the Haldeman-Julius publications, although it is apparently missing “The Truth About Los Angeles.”
|
|
“Marriage, like all human institutions, has its advantages and disillusions; therefore, it should be entered into with care and the selection of a partner founded upon good judgment.”
|
[Marian] Marion secure. [Use good judgment.] Interference with my plans dangerous. [Marian] Marion Parker
|
|||||||||
|
ALSO |
|
Any day I can do research is a good day – even if I run into trouble, as I did on Tuesday. I stopped by the Los Angeles Public Library to delve into the microfilm on the Marion Parker case. And here’s what I found in the Los Angeles Evening Express for Dec. 19, 1927. (Sorry about the quality of the scan. It was a challenging day). |
|
|
Los Angeles Times file photo Clarence Darrow addresses the jury in one of his two trials on charges of trying to bribe jurors in the McNamara brothers’ case. |
For the last week, I have been reading the transcripts of People vs. Clarence Darrow, which were digitized by the Los Angeles County Law Library and are available from the University of Minnesota’s Law Library. WARNING: The transcripts consist of 90 PDF files in a 400-megabyte portfolio, so downloading them will put a load on your computer and printing them out could take days and consume 8,000 sheets of paper. But if you are patient, you will be rewarded. Reading the transcripts is like being in court and hearing the long speeches and nearly continuous objections of Darrow’s defense team of Earl Rogers and Horace Appel, two brilliant attorneys whose lives disintegrated like powerful engines that were run too hard for too long. Rogers is known today through a few books, and Appel is completely forgotten, so the transcripts provide a record of their speeches and examples of their courtroom tactics. And then there are the random outbursts: The prosecution generally comes off well in the transcripts and Dist. Atty. John D. Fredericks – referred to as Capt. Fredericks because of his rank in the California National Guard -- and Deputy Dist. Atty. W. Joseph Ford seem to be well-matched to Rogers and Appel. The major tactical mistake, based on my reading to date, is that Fredericks brought in too many witnesses in an attempt to show Darrow’s unrelenting determination to win the case -- by bribery and coercion if necessary. The defense won and Darrow was found not guilty – but if even half of the testimony is true, it paints a damning portrait of one of America’s legal heroes as a ruthless, corrupt man. The transcripts are also a window on the past in countless ways. Much of the action focuses on a ranch outside El Monte, with a barn and a water tower. People ride streetcars and go into saloons with swinging doors. The courtroom is small, crowded and hot, so the judge moves the trial into a bigger courtroom in the Hall of Records. The transcripts fill three boxes, so they aren’t easy reading – but there are many treasures to be discovered. Thanks and a tip of the hat to John Aloysius Farrell for reminding me that the transcripts are online. I stumbled across the University of Minnesota Law Library’s Clarence Darrow website early in my research and it had slipped my mind. |
| Advertisement |
|
|