« May 24, 1938 | Main | May 25, 1908 »

The Toronto Dodgers?

May 24, 1958

By Keith Thursby
Times staff writer

1958_0524_sports A day after saying Los Angeles could lose the Dodgers if voters don't back a plan to build a stadium in Chavez Ravine, National League President Warren Giles turned politician. He played both sides of the fence.

Giles insisted to a Times reporter that he wasn't threatening Los Angeles or making an ultimatum when he suggested that a defeat of Prop. B in the June 3 election would mean National League owners would work to find the Dodgers a new city. Preferably one that wanted to build a new stadium.

"All I am doing is stating the facts," Giles told The Times' Frank Finch. "I am not presumptuous enough to indicate how the citizens of Los Angeles should vote."

Of course not.

In the same story, Giles said there would be no difficulty in finding a new city for the Dodgers to call home. He wouldn't get specific, but the story mentioned Minneapolis, Houston and Toronto as prospects.

Meanwhile, the issue seemed to bring out the best in two of Los Angeles' best quotes, Mayor Norris Poulson and City Councilman Patrick McGee.

"Los Angeles would be the laughingstock of the nation if we went back on our word," said Poulson. And in the other corner, here's McGee: "Giles' threat is an insult to the intelligence of the people of the city of Los Angeles."

keith.thursby@latimes.com

Comments

"Los Angeles would be the laughingstock of the nation if we went back on our word,[selling the Dodgers Chavez Ravine if Prop B passed]" said [Los Angeles Mayor] Poulson.

What if Prop B had passed? Let's speculate.

Maybe the Dodgers would have gone back to New York if the City of New York build the stadium Robert Moses promised. Instead Shea Stadium was built for the expansion NL New York Mets.

Even before the Dodgers moved to L.A., Baseball teams were relocating. The Saint Louis Browns moved to Baltimore and became the Orioles. The Boston Braves moved to Milwaukee. The Philadelphia Athletics moved to Kansas CIty. Of course the New York Giants moved to San Francisco the same year the Dodgers moved to Los Angeles. This would hardly be the end of team relocation either, far from it.

There would also be league expansion. In a few years, New York got it's replacement NL team and Houston got an NL team. Washington, DC got a new AL team the year it's old AL team left for Minnesota. Of course, Los Angeles in 1961 would get an expansion AL team, the Angels. THis would not be the end of MLB expansion either, far from it.

Los Angeles would have gotten another NL team one way or another. Too many other team owners were filled with wanderlust in those years.

I don't know if the Dodgers would have moved back to New York -- Moses had wanted them at the Flushing Meadows site that eventually became Shea, and O'Malley simply wasn't interested...his initial goal, as we all know, was to build a stadium near the Atlantic Avenue LIRR terminal (the area where an arena is now planned for the NBA's New Jersey Nets to move to in a few years).

What might have happened would have been a move to the Twin Cities, an area the Dodgers were familiar with since they had a AAA farm team in St. Paul. However, they would have moved to the ballpark in Bloomington, Minn. that was being used by St. Paul's archrivals, the Minneapolis Millers -- the same ballpark that would be occupied in 1961 by the original American League Washington Senators. In fact, before Los Angeles made overtures, Minneapolis-St. Paul was the market O'Malley was considering if he had to leave Brooklyn; it was deemed to have many of the same qualities that had made Milwaukee such a bonanza for the relocated Boston Braves (although we know that fizzled out a few years later).

If the Dodgers had left Los Angeles, it would have presented major logistical and scheduling problems, since San Francisco would have been the only West Coast franchise. The National League thus might have expanded to both L.A. and New York (although the majors expanded only because of the threat of Branch Rickey's proposed Continental League and congressional threats over MLB's anti-trust exemption). Of course, eventually the NL did take in new teams in NYC and Houston.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






Our Bloggers
Larry Harnisch

Larry Harnisch. The leading Black Dahlia expert and a collaborator in the 1947project, Harnisch has been a copy editor at The Times since 1988. He has appeared on many TV shows discussing the Dahlia case, notably "James Ellroy's Feast of Death."

Join him for a spin through old Los Angeles in the Mirror's radio car. Keep your eyes open for Mickey Cohen and Tempest Storm. It's quite a ride.

The reporter's badge belonged to Sid Hughes (1908-1958), legendary reporter who worked at nearly every newspaper in Los Angeles.


Keith Thursby. Keith has been an editor at The Times in news, sports and design since 1986. The Rams moved to St. Louis on his first day as assistant sports editor of the paper's Orange County edition. He grew up in Norwalk and lives in Irvine.








Recent Comments

WHen are you going to tell us her name? It is...
comment by Mary A.

I was wondering if you know of a compilation ...
comment by David Arnold

I have no idea who the woman is, but I think ...
comment by Duane

Leno will buy it - and he has an expert to te...
comment by zabadu

So where is the story about the 1938 USC/Notr...
comment by Jim

I would have to guess that the gentleman in t...
comment by MIKE SCANLON

Blogs