The Big Picture

Patrick Goldstein and James Rainey
on entertainment and media

« Previous Post | The Big Picture Home | Next Post »

'How Do You Know' when a movie's a flop: James Brooks loses his mojo

Jim_brooks James Brooks is one of the comedy gods, having brought us such brainy film delights as "Broadcast News" and "Terms of Endearment,"  not to mention serving as a godfather to "The Simpsons" and creator of such TV hits as "Taxi," "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" and "Lou Grant." But in Hollywood, even the gods finally lose their powers. And Brooks is about to take a nasty pratfall this weekend with the release of "How Do You Know," a romantic comedy that is barely romantic and rarely funny.

The film, which stars Reese Witherspoon, Jack Nicholson and Owen Wilson, has been roasted by the critics -- it now has a 36 fresh rating at Rotten Tomatoes, which is pretty bad, considering that even the much-maligned "Burlesque" earned a 38. In fact, the critical onslaught has been so withering that Sony Pictures is running full page ads for the film without any blurbs at all, which has got to be a first for Brooks, who could do no wrong with critics, at least until 2004's "Spanglish," which also was a dud with both critics and audiences.

Even worse, for both Brooks and Sony, "How Do You Know," which box office pundits say could do less than $10 million in its opening weekend, will probably be an expensive flop. The film cost at least $100 million to make, with nearly half of that going to a trio of stars whose salary quotes are right up there with the Miami Heat's fearsome threesome of LeBron James, Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh. According to a post from the Hollywood Reporter, Witherspoon gets $15 million, Nicholson gets $12 million, Wilson gets $10 million, with another $10 million for Brooks. Paul Rudd, who also has a costarring role, was  paid $3 million.  

Although Sony is hoping the film might perform like Nancy Myers' "It's Complicated," outside experts predict the film's box-office trajectory will much more closely resemble "Spanglish," which despite the presence of Adam Sandler opened to a wan $8.8 million on the same date in 2004, and went downhill from there, ending up only making $42 million in the US. It's hard to imagine "How Do You Know" doing any better, especially since it appeals to an older demographic, who actually read reviews.

The reviews have been dreadful, with the Wall Street Journal's Joe Morgenstern only devoting two paragraphs to the picture, saying "no need to belabor the awfulness of this film." Most studios, after the demise of "Spanglish," which cost $75 million to make, would never dream of giving a filmmaker, even one of Brooks' pedigree, even more money on another stuffy romantic comedy. (When Clint Eastwood famously had to find outside money for "Mystic River," despite the filmmaker's decades-long ties with Warners, it was because his previous film, "Blood Work," had been a flop.) But Sony's Amy Pascal has staked her reputation on being the most talent-friendly studio chief in Hollywood, having successfully wooed everyone from Sandler and Will Smith to David Fincher to join her studio stable.

Pascal viewed Brooks in the same light, as the Sun King of comedy filmmakers. But at 70, Brooks is like the aging slugger who can't get around on the fastball anymore -- he's finally lost his comic mojo. When I saw "How Do You Know," I had the same reaction as Morgenstern, who said, "You watch it with a heavy heart, and sit through it like a stone." The characters were stick figures, the jokes were flat, the situations felt scarily insular. Everything about it felt self-absorbed and out of touch -- there was hardly a scene in the film that you couldn't imagine having been shot 15 or 20 years ago.

As Todd McCarthy put it in the Hollywood Reporter, like "Spanglish," the new Brooks film "shares the same sense of separation from real life, of having been hatched in some west-of-the-405 bubble that's raised its drawbridge to the outside world." It's time Brooks got out of his comfort zone. His films used to have a wonderfully restless, neurotic energy, but "How Do You Know" feels like it was phoned in from someone resting uncomfortably on his laurels.

-- Patrick Goldstein

Photo: James Brooks with Reese Witherspoon, left, and Sony Pictures co-chairman Amy Pascal at the premiere of "How Do You Know" in Los Angeles.

Credit: Kevin Winter/Getty Images 


Comments () | Archives (7)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Never heard of this movie until now. This is not a good sign.

Almost 80 mil. in fees for stars and director alone? Probably under 500 k for the crew; who knows what pennies the writer got unless it was Brooks. This really looks like another bomb for the Hollywood studio elite. Come on...the trailer alone tells ya that much. What has happened to Brooks? Has he truly forgotten that he's a writer first and foremost? Here's an idea sir James...
support some unknown writers who can come up with a better story that this one. Support some unknown actors who really have their chops down instead of memorizing what steps to take on the red carpet. And for once...make a really good movie, by telling a great story. As in....great characaters in great scenes. As in characters with flaws. As in your work on Taxi, the Simpson's, The Mary Tyler Moore show...and obviously Broadcast News.

$40 million to hire four actors (assuming the figures are accurate, and exclusive of participation). Another $10 mil for Brooks. For that, Sony could have made a number of low-budget comedies. One out of several connects decently, and they're in profit on the entire package. Not to mention how relatively poorly comedy does overseas.

Maybe if Nicholson played a robot....

Ouch! Go gently into the night, good sir.

I think James Rainey needs his own section of the LATimes website. Somewhere far away from where I look for entertainment. While I found your above article very entertaining, I find all everything he writes to be dull and preachy. Patrick - help me out on this one.

Brooks' boring dramedy formula: neurotic people, usually a triangle, who don't sleep with each other, or who do but don't find happiness anyway. Will they do it now? Now? Now? Who cares? Toto's pulled back the curtain, and Brooks is no wizard.

While this film does not fully work, there is much in it to admire and love. The level of vitriol in the reviews is just not called for. Rudd and Witherspoon do fine work, there are several really great scenes. Given the dreadful muck that passes for romantic comedy these days, this film deserves more love.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:

About the Bloggers



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: