The Big Picture

Patrick Goldstein and James Rainey
on entertainment and media

« Previous Post | The Big Picture Home | Next Post »

Will 'The Social Network' spark the return of (gasp) Hollywood dramas?

Jesse_eisenberg Imagine my good luck. As I was leaving a screening of "The Social Network" Wednesday night, I bumped into a young woman who had been at Harvard at exactly the same time as Mark Zuckerberg, the hero (or should I say antihero) of the David Fincher-directed and Aaron Sorkin-written movie about the creation of Facebook. Since one of the big issues swirling around the film is whether it represents an accurate portrayal of Zuckerberg and his meteoric rise to Internet stardom, I asked the woman if the the Zuckerberg she saw on screen--portrayed by Jesse Eisenberg--was the genuine article.

Absolutely, she said. From her vantage point as a fellow student, the film perfectly captured the whole heady time when Facebook cut a broad swath through the Harvard community. But what about Zuckerberg, who is portrayed in the film as a socially inept, borderline sociopath. Was he really that, well, unpleasant? And what about the Winklevoss twins, the hunky rowing team stars who claimed that Zuckerberg stole their idea for Facebook? It seemed so utterly unlikely that they could have ever crossed paths with a world-class nerd like Zuckerberg.

Ah, she said. That's Harvard. You'd be amazed what a diverse assortment of people were all there, mixing it up with each other. The movie really caught the feel of the place, she said.

So when it comes to authenticity, let's give "The Social Network" an A. Without getting into review territory, the other thing that really struck me about the film--which opens Oct. 1--is that it's exactly the kind of picture that movie studios are terrified to make these days. It's an adult drama -- with a capital D. It expects its audience to follow a complex dramatic storyline, make moral judgments about its characters and decide for themselves where their sympathies lie. Of course, as anyone who has watched his TV shows can attest, that is classic Aaron Sorkin. But it's certainly refreshing to see real drama up on the big screen again.

For veteran Sorkin watchers, the other fascinating element is how much the film has in common with "The Farnsworth Invention," a script Sorkin wrote a number of years ago that he adapted into a Broadway play. Like "The Social Network," "Farnsworth Invention" revolves around a heated dispute over the invention of a new technology. With "Social Network," it's Facebook. With "Farnsworth," it's TV. The play, which ran on Broadway for three months in late 2007 and early 2008, was about the patent battle between a geeky young inventor named Philo T. Farnsworth (clearly a dramatic first cousin to Zuckerberg) and RCA tycoon David Sarnoff over the technology that led to the creation of television broadcasting.

Of course, Farnsworth was a forgotten figure in TV history. No one can say that about Zuckerberg. He  might be totally appalled by the way he is portrayed in "The Social Network," but he's certainly going to have his moment in the spotlight when this movie arrives, since the film's unsentimental portrayal of a young man's burning ambitions is sure to be the subject of heated debate for months to come. 

Photo: Jesse Eisenberg, left, and Joseph Mazzello in "The Social Network." Credit: Merrick Morton / Columbia Pictures

Comments () | Archives (6)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Last time I checked Zuckerberg and his board from Facebook said this film is far from what really went on. He had refused to consult the producers because he did not want to be attached to fictitious portrayal of what happened.

Zuckerberg said it himself this film was more dramatic than anything that ever happened.

BTW the actor that portrays Zuckerberg is far from what he really was, but they still seem to use that guy or Micheal Sera for every dork in a film.

"this film was more dramatic than anything that ever happened"

thats why its a movie and not a reality show.... most "based on a true story" movies are dramatized for the movie goers sake.

just saying.

So, this woman who attended Harvard never did answer his questions...useless.
She should run for office.

The movie should make a good rental.

Yes, it's not a film review yet I still appreciate that "drama" is discussed here without resorting to the ol' "Auteur" theory—no mention of Fincher.

But before I raise the flag for the "Author" (read "Writer") theory I have to note that there was also no mention of the primary writer, Ben Mezrich, either.

The hilarity of the Facebook defenders is most appreciated.

Does any thinking person seriously think that only biopics (or biographies) must be approved by their subjects to be of value?

It's like falling into a room filled with Sarah Palin clones.

Carts and horses - if a handful of dramas *sell tickets*, then drama will return. But I don't think SOCIAL NETWORK has sold any tickets, yet, has it?

Biggest question - will *adults* want to watch a movie about Facebook? Will they want to watch it in the cinema on opening night... or NetFlix it? One way puts money into Hollywood's pockets (so they will consider making more dramas) the other does not.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:

About the Bloggers



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: