The Big Picture

Patrick Goldstein and James Rainey
on entertainment and media

« Previous Post | The Big Picture Home | Next Post »

Showbiz shocker: Hollywood is really ruled by ... fear!

The_joker My favorite conservative film blog is Libertas Film Magazine, since they actually love movies and (unlike the crazies over at Andrew Breitbart's Big Hollywood) don't view every film through the prism of how it's furthering a cunning Hollywood socialist plot to undermine American values. So I guess it's a tribute to Libertas' free-thinking conservatism that the site's new regular contributor is a successful comedy screenwriter who in his debut post dispels the conservative myth that Hollywood studios are always trying to enforce a political agenda.

In fact, says the screenwriter--who goes by the nom de plume the Joker--the real driving force behind most industry decision making is one emotion, and one only: fear. Here's his key take on the subject:

"If Hollywood has one reigning ideology, one overriding 'agenda' that governs everything that happens, it's this fear of being fired. Fear is the unified field theory of Hollywood. [Studio execs] are fairly good with story structure, and give surprisingly well-thought-out notes. But on certain issues, the political ones, the notes tend to gravitate toward the absurd because their Number One Rule of Comedy is: Offend No One. Why? Because executives are basically afraid. So given the mandate of 'offending no one,' comedy writers are generally asked to excise all politics from the plot, characters and themes.... Go for the safe bad guy (corporations), the pat ending (the divorced couple get back together), the inoffensive villain (Russians and Nazis okay, Arabs and African-Americans not so much)." 

This safety first description jibes with stories I have heard from screenwriters over the years, but what gives it a fresh spin is the way the Joker relates it to Hollywood politics. He points out that political agendas can break both ways in the business. Liberal cliches abound in scripts that routinely portray real estate developers as the bad guys, while on the other hand there is a virtual ban on characters having abortions in studio movies.

He also makes a shrewd point about Girl Power--or the lack of it--in studio circles. The Joker worked on a big studio romantic comedy in which the couple has sex with other people during a break in their relationship, only to get back together in the end. The studio's big note: The woman can't have sex with another guy, though she could :"almost" have sex, as long as she didn't actually do the dirty deed. When the writer asked for clarification--"Okay, so they both 'almost' have sex with other people?"--he was told that of course, the guy could have sex, just not the girl.

The punch line? "And the executive giving the note was a woman. So was her boss and the head of the studio. How's that for progressive Hollywood feminism?" How's that indeed. The clear point here being that even though Hollywood may be loaded with liberals and self-styled feminists of all stripes, when it comes to assembling a commercial movie, everyone tends to check their ideas at the door. Having a hit is always far more important than making a statement. As Sam Goldwyn used to tell his screenwriters oh-so-many eons ago: If you want to send a message, call Western Union. 

Photo: Heath Ledger as the Joker in "The Dark Knight." Credit: Stephen Vaughn / Warner Bros. Pictures

 

 
Comments () | Archives (3)

The comments to this entry are closed.

You're going to have to try harder than that. If this is your best example, it's not convincing me.

Although the source material changed of the romantic movie, the studio went into it knowing the original material. It's not about making a liberal movie into a conservative one, but moderating a liberal movie. It's softing the edges. It's deceptive. It undermines.

The western union comment again???????

Let's just go down a list of extremely failing,
commercially unsuccessful movies because they
were obviously message movies above all else:

THE CHINA SYNDROME
SAVE THE TIGER
ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN
3 DAYS OF THE CONDOR
JFK
WALL STREET
COOL HAND LUKE
DO THE RIGHT THING
MALCOM X
MIDNIGHT COWBOY
COMING HOME

Sure, they were entertaining stories and all of them had stars
in them...but they were message movies first and foremost.
Strong, blatant, in-your-face social and individual themes.
No one afraid of stating the obvious problems of America
and overall -- the human race:

Greed, corruption, racism, just to name a few.

Love INCEPTION, STAR WARS, JAWS, AVATAR and many others, but come on...we're no longer living in the eras of the 30s, 40s and 50s.

And the more Hollywood continually lives in fear, and does nothing but the safe bet over and over...the more the true Indies
in America and all over the world...truly tell gut honest and many times truthfully wrenching stories on their own terms...

...the more they'll find their audience and conncet with them on their own terms.

And, the Hollywood model will keep breaking down bit by bit...until it just won't be commercially viable anymore.

Especially when a future Hollywood studio budget will hover around 400 mil. or more.

Write on, right on.

MARK11

There's a deeper reason for fear. It is that no matter what is predicted by so-called experts, audiences are always fickle. Once a trend has been identified, it is often over. No one knows with certainty what will be the next great success. Many pretend to be in the know, but no one really is. The greatest fear is that the pretention of knowing will be discovered sooner or later, and that person's reign will be over. Everything else flows from that fear of being unmasked by audience taste.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:



About the Bloggers


Categories


Archives
 


Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: