Michael Moore hits pay dirt in Hollywood
If Hollywood really had its own mayor, Michael Moore could probably have the job for life, especially judging from the lovey-dovey reception he got Tuesday night at the Motion Picture Academy, where he showed his new film, "Capitalism: A Love Story," before a packed house of rapturous fans. Looking as big and beefy as ever -- he's certainly no poster boy for the Pritikin diet -- wearing a black sports coat and a red baseball cap, Moore got a standing ovation when he took the stage before the film started.
He'd just come from taping an appearance on the new "Jay Leno Show." When Leno called him and asked if he'd appear on the second night of the program, Moore, not exactly shy when it comes to self promotion, quipped: "What's wrong with the first night?" He also tossed a genial barb at Overture Films, the company releasing the film here next week, saying that he really appreciated their support "especially when they didn't know if I was going to go after their corporate parent or not."
As you've probably heard by now, the film offers an all-out attack on the unfettered nature of American capitalism, which Moore views as a gigantic, looming threat to democracy, since the system is largely rigged to benefit the richest 1% of the population at the expense of the rest of us. Many of the individual scenes are riveting, especially the footage of Moore's crew shot at an old-fashioned sit-in at a Chicago door and window factory. But I wonder if critics will be divided over how successful Moore is in tying together all the strands of his critique -- which includes everything from poor pay for commuter jet pilots to the collapse of the Florida condo market to privatized juvenile detention centers, along with a healthy round of Goldman Sachs bashing for basically orchestrating a Wall Street bailout that did a better job of serving its interests than aiding taxpayers.
What I found especially fascinating is that a lot of the film's rhetoric, especially its populist take on the evils of crony capitalism, isn't so different from the anti-government rhetoric we've heard at many of the Tea Parties and town-hall meetings and last week's Washington protest rally. Everyone is mad at the establishment, which provided billions to bail out well-connected insiders, but screwed most of the Average Joes. After all, even though the break-out star of "Capitalism" is Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), a feisty House Democrat who is the most vocal opponent of Wall Street giveaways, it was the die-hard conservative House Republicans who were largely united in their opposition to the bailout bill.
Of course, Moore's populist fervor comes from a very different place. He's a share-the-wealth, Bruce Springsteen style liberal: pro-union, loyal to underdogs, suspicious of fat cats and fond of Woody Guthrie, who is heard at the movie's end, singing "Jesus Christ," a 1940 ballad that paints Christ as a friend of the poor, "laid in his grave" by the rich bankers and landlords who were threatened by his populist preachings.
In fact, the most autobiographical part of the film is rooted in the connection Moore makes between his Catholic upbringing and his championing of social justice. He interviews a number of priests and bishops in "Capitalism," all of them vocal critics of the excesses of our Wall Street-based form of free enterprise. Moore gave an interview to the New York Times, which runs this Sunday, in which he implies that his politics are just as grounded in Catholicism as in his more familiar exercises in class warfare.
As the Times Bruce Headlam puts it: "Along with a moral imperative, Catholicism also gave [the filmmaker] a method. Mr. Moore idolized the Berrigan brothers, the radical priests who introduced street theater into their activism, for example, mixing their own napalm to burn government draft records. Their actions were a form of political spectacle that ... influenced some of Mr. Moore's best remembered stunts."
Ironically, in recent months, it has been the fringe elements on the right who've been using street theater and showmanship -- for example, Fox's Glenn Beck or those gun-toting hotheads at town meetings -- to get their anti-government and anti-Obama messages across. Maybe Moore has been all too successful in showing how much effect you can have with clever agitprop theater. At the Academy, Moore reminded his supporters -- who would include most of Hollywood -- that it was time for them to get their message across.
"The American people will do the right thing if they're given the right information and if they're not manipulated by the Fox Newses of the world," he said. "We spent the summer watching a minority of people painting Hitler mustaches on Obama and scaring Democrats ... and I want to ask, 'Who has his back?' I hope this film will be a catalyst to get people involved in our democracy, because you have to be involved. Democracy is not a spectator sport."
Here's Moore on Leno, including his a capella singing debut:
Photo: Michael Moore. Credit: Carlo Allegri / Associated Press








thank goodness for Michael straightening out all that Jesus Christ stuff for us!
Posted by: 2 cents | September 16, 2009 at 04:10 PM
One word for Michael Moore: LOSER.
Posted by: FreeThinker | September 16, 2009 at 06:34 PM
Where to begin? Let's see Moore redistribute his own wealth ... and show us the paperwork.
Why does he have so many fans in Hollywood when the changes he would like to bring to the country would bring his fans' paychecks down to mortal size? It's as hypocritical as celebrities bemoaning global warming, then hopping on their personal airplanes.
And I take exception to your term "those gun-toting protesters..." How many of the hundreds of thousands of protesters toted guns over the last few months? Under 10? Yet you use those very rare instances to smear an entire movement. I don't see that as fair. The media never labeled the anti war movement with anything negative, but the truly ugly images/posters from those marches could have been used in just such a fashion.
"Manipulated by the Fox Newses of the world?" Wow. Moore has nearly every media outlet singing his tune ... and he can't stand the fact that one channel exists that doesn't celebrate him as a hero? Pathetic.
Posted by: Christian Toto | September 16, 2009 at 08:35 PM
If the idea that Michael Moore has teamed up with media Mogul John Malone of Liberty Media weren't ironic enough, Malone's company Sirius XM was the subject of the documentary "Stock Shock-the Short Selling of the American Dream," which highlights the company as one of the most corrupted stocks in the market. Investors in Sirius XM lost over 95% of the value of their stock in the company when it nearly went bankrupt earlier this year due to illegal market manipulation, and some contend, internal corporate greed. John Malone turned out to be the satellite company's white knight saving it from ruin at the 11th hour with a loan of several hundred million dollars.
"Stock Shock" interviewed disgruntled investors like Michael Hartleib, founder of SaveSirius.org, who insist that Malone virtually swindled the company away from shareholders when he was awarded a 40% stake in the billion dollar company for the last minute loan.
Hartleib asks, "How was this management team able to steal forty percent of our company without we, the true owners of this company, having a vote or a seat at the table? How was Mr. Malone given forty percent of our company for free?"
"Stock Shock" filmmakers are making the movie available on DVD at Amazon.com and www.stockshockmovie.com. The movie was released on DVD this summer.
Posted by: J.D. | September 17, 2009 at 01:36 AM
The author clearly states that republicans in congress were the ones who wanted to vote against the bailouts to Wall St, yet right-wingers still have to attack the author for his supposed left-wing bias. Exactly why are right-wingers reading the LA Times anyway? This is not your main organ of truth. The fact is that liberals didn't kill capitalism, rather it killed itself, with the help of laissez-faire corporate-toadie republicans (all of them) under an openly conservative president Bush, followed by sell-out DLC democrats. So despite the fact that liberals weren't even in on the process, somehow the left-wing is still responsible. Don't ask a conservative to be consistent in their thinking or logic. It's impossible for them. Capitalism is done in America, whether you like it or not. The free market is a giant shaft, and everyone in every party knows it, whether they can tell their moronic constituents or not, because they somehow equate raw capitalism with frontier fantasies that they're living in another century riding next to John Wayne. This has got to be the largest example of mass insanity on the planet today, and is very dangerous and will have to be tread on quite heavily eventually.
Posted by: Esol Esek | September 18, 2009 at 01:12 AM