The Big Picture

Patrick Goldstein on the collision of entertainment, media and pop culture

« Previous Post | The Big Picture Home | Next Post »

'At the Movies' swats away its flyweight critics

August 5, 2009 |  5:29 pm

NBC only had to take a gander at the ratings for one episode of its much-ballyhooed "Quarterlife" series before the network gave the show the old heave-ho last year. It took ABC nearly a year before it realized that Ben Lyons and Ben Mankiewicz -- the fresh-faced "At the Movies" hosts who had replaced Richard Roeper and the one-and-only Roger Ebert -- were an embarrassment to all, meaning the previous hosts, the network and the critical profession in general.

Atthemovies So I can't say I'm shocked to read the news that ABC has dumped Lyons and Mankiewicz and hired a new pair of critical heavyweights, the New York Times' A.O. (Tony) Scott and the Chicago Tribune's Michael Phillips, to anchor the long-running syndicated series. I've rubbed shoulders with both guys on the film festival circuit and happily endorse the appointment. Scott and Phillips are lively, intelligent writers with a keen grasp of what makes films work, which in itself makes them a huge improvement over the previous duo, who were critical bantamweights, especially Lyons, who had a bright smile but about as much gravitas as an Alabama beauty show contestant.

To be fair, Mankiewicz, the scion of a fabled Hollywood family who hosts Turner Classic Movies presentations, was clearly more knowledgeable than his counterpart. As my colleague Chris Lee reported last December, Lyons, son of film critic Jeffrey Lyons, was held in such low esteem in the critical fraternity that others in the profession were lining up, happy to be quoted by name ridiculing his work, with Chicago-based film critic Erik Childress saying of Lyons: "He has no taste. Everyone thinks he's a joke."

Well, everyone except for Disney-owned ABC TV. The network clearly believed that the venerable TV show, which traced its roots to the mid-1970s, when the Pulitzer Prize-winning Ebert and his Chicago newspaper pal, the late Gene Siskel, launched the first nationally known TV film critic program, needed a re-branding to appeal to younger audiences and boost its ratings. Of course, the opposite happened. As ABC reported on its own website, the show's ratings dropped sharply, slipping from 2.1 million to 1.7 million after Lyons and Mankiewicz took over.

The network made one simple miscalculation: It thought that by hiring younger, more effervescent critics that it could get a younger audience to watch a cobwebby network TV format. That's never going to happen. Just ask the great minds at CBS, who hired Katie Couric, thinking that a younger, more effervescent newscaster could get a younger audience to watch a cobwebby network TV format. Film critics are in the same boat as evening news anchors -- their core audience is people 50 and over, and getting older by the day. You could hire Jessica Alba to read the evening news -- or review "G.I. Joe" for that matter -- and younger audiences still wouldn't care.

Don't get me wrong: I grew up reading film critics -- it's what helped me understand the history and meaning of film, not to mention how to appreciate such exciting filmmakers as Nicholas Ray, Howard Hawks, Sam Fuller and Hal Ashby. But expecting Phillips and Scott to deliver network-sized ratings in an era where hardly anyone under 40 pays attention to critics is a fool's errand.

Despite their intellectual heft and engaging personalities -- when you have dinner with Michael Phillips, you are sure to enjoy a sparkling evening of good conversation -- they are being asked to revive a format that is as moribund as a black-and-white detective series.  

The best thing ABC could do is keep improving the show's presence on the Web, where expectations are lower and where fans -- like myself -- could sample the new critics' take on specific films on demand. One of the cult hits on the Web last year was Reel Geezers, where Lorenzo Semple and Marcia Nasatir, two eightysomething old film pros, fussed and bickered on YouTube over various recently released films. Film criticism remains an honorable trade, but it's now a niche business, which is why it feels especially wrong-headed for ABC to cast two wonderfully gifted critics in a role where they are doomed to fail if the network's only priority is bringing more eyeballs to TV screens.

Photo of Ben Lyons (left) and Ben Mankiewicz by Jason DeCrow / Associated Press


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Great news! I quit watching when Ben & Ben took over, and I'm 28! A.O. Scott and Michael Phillips did great jobs when they guest hosted with Roeper, so I'm looking forward to it.

This is a welcome move, to say the least. I was a regular weekly viewer of "At the Movies" from the late 90's until last year, when these "younger" hosts were hired. Once A.O. and Michael take over, I'll again start viewing. They each were excellent as guest hosts and will provide an intellectualism to this show that's been missing for the past 12 months.

Thank God! Our national nightmare is over. I really like Phillips and Scott but am curious why Richard Roeper wasn't brought back? If they're trying to revive the show what better way then to bring back the last link to it's original lineage? I guess we can assume either; a) Roeper is sick of doing the show, b) Roeper wanted too much money or c) Roeper burned too many bridges when they couldn't come to terms last year.

To the person who asked why Richard Roeper won't be hosting "At the Movies" again... Roeper and Roger Ebert left the show under a contract dispute and they've announced plans to have their own movie reviews show. There's no word yet if when and where people can see the show. I'm assuming they're still working on a distribution deal.

Roger Ebert wrote on his blog that Michael Phillips and the Associated Press' Christy Lemire would also be involved with their show, but now that Phillips has signed on to host "At the Movies," we can assume Phillips will no longer be working with Roeper and Ebert.

To the person who asked why Richard Roeper won't be hosting "At the Movies" again... Roeper and Roger Ebert left the show under a contract dispute and they've announced plans to have their own movie reviews show. There's no word yet if it when and where people can see the show. I'm assuming they're still working on a distribution deal.

Roger Ebert wrote on his blog that Michael Phillips and the Associated Press' Christy Lemire would also be involved with their show, but now that Phillips has signed on to host "At the Movies," we can assume Phillips will no longer be working with Roeper and Ebert.

To the person who asked why Richard Roeper won't be hosting "At the Movies" again... Roeper and Roger Ebert left the show under a contract dispute and they've announced plans to have their own movie reviews show. There's no word yet if it when and where people can see the show. I'm assuming they're still working on a distribution deal.

Roger Ebert wrote on his blog that Michael Phillips and the Associated Press' Christy Lemire would also be involved with their show, but now that Phillips has signed on to host "At the Movies," we can assume Phillips will no longer be working with Roeper and Ebert.

To the person who asked why Richard Roeper won't be hosting "At the Movies" again ... Roeper and Roger Ebert left the show under a contract dispute and they've announced plans to have their own movie reviews show. There's no word yet when and where people can see the show, because they're probably still working on a distribution deal.

Roger Ebert wrote on his blog that Michael Phillips and the Associated Press' Christy Lemire would also be involved with their show, but now that Phillips has signed on to host "At the Movies," we can assume Phillips will no longer be working with Roeper and Ebert.

To the person who asked why Richard Roeper won't be hosting "At the Movies" again ... Roeper and Roger Ebert left the show under a contract dispute and they've announced plans to have their own movie reviews show. There's no word yet when and where people can see the show, because they're probably still working on a distribution deal.

Roger Ebert wrote on his blog that Michael Phillips and the Associated Press' Christy Lemire would also be involved with their show, but now that Phillips has signed on to host "At the Movies," we can assume Phillips will no longer be working with Roeper and Ebert.

Hey, DKR? Do you know why Roeper & Ebert aren't on the show? If so - could you post it 5 times?

I have been watching the show with my wife for more than 10 years. First taping it in VHS and now in the DVR. I really like "Mank", he was insightful and knew what he was talking about. But Lyons was a disgraced, he looks like a college student. I do like Philips but I think A O Scott is a little too "snobby" for the show. The best couple would have been Roeper & Mank.

 


Advertisement

About the Bloggers




Archives