Did Fox tell a whopper about the pirated copy of 'Wolverine'?
20th Century Fox has already survived one PR nightmare, after discovering that someone had stolen a pirated workprint of its much-ballyhooed summer blockbuster "X Men Origins: Wolverine" and put it on the Internet a full month before it was scheduled to hit the theaters (May 1).
The studio managed to weather another embarrassment when a Fox News.com columnist, Roger Friedman, not only reviewed the pirated movie but boasted about how easy it was to download off the Web, prompting a nasty in-house tussle that resulted in Friedman's firing.
The studio has now been embroiled in a new nightmare: Even though Fox Co-Chairman Tom Rothman told Entertainment Weekly shortly after the film leaked that the pirated copy was substantially different from the actual movie, including being "about 10 minutes shorter," people who've now seen the finished film are saying it is -- gulp -- exactly the same length as the pirated copy.
As Aint It Cool News reported today: "Having seen the finished film, the mystery is solved: The workprint version IS in fact identical to the release print, sans effects and some audio work. It's obvious that FOX is trying their darndest to keep this news from getting out, because it will eliminate most of the motivation for people who have seen the workprint to pay for a ticket."
To add insult to injury, the AICN review says the film, while fun, has lackluster visual effects, along with a "non-existing story, horrible dialogue and criminally underdeveloped characters." Ouch!
Bloggers may not get their own facts right much of the time, but boy, are they hard on studios who dissemble to protect their big summer movies. Hilary Lewis at businessinsider.com calls the news about the movie's virtually identical running time a fresh scandal, saying, "Fox is in trouble. Now not only are all of the bad reviews of the workprint version justified, but the studio's been caught in a lie -- which weakens the trust audiences have in the studio and might lead to more people watching the pirated versions of Fox's films, including 'Wolverine.' "
I'm not sure the situation is really that dire. The bad buzz from the Internet could put a crimp in the film's opening weekend onslaught, but history has shown that most fans, especially devotees of visual effects films, want to see the movie on the big screen. Still, I can't say Fox has done a great job of combating this latest onslaught of bad news. After waiting for hours, I finally got a bland statement that doesn't address at all the issue of how Rothman could say roughly 10 minutes were missing when, in fact, the running time of the finished film -- 107 minutes, according to those who've seen it -- is the same running time as the pirated version.
All Fox said was that the pirated workprint "is substantially different than the release version. The pirated version had over 400 unfinished effects, dozens of unrefined scenes and no sound or score or color work done at all and is not remotely representative of the experience that moviegoers will have when the film is finally released theatrically."
Fox insiders also say theatergoers will get an "Easter egg" surprise at the end of the film, with the arrival of two versions of new narrative footage (i.e. not outtakes) that will push the storyline forward. Half of the prints around the country will have one version, half will have the other.
I'm eager to hear from "Wolverine" fans on this issue: Is this a tempest in a teapot? Or do you feel the studio has been playing fast and loose with the facts?
Photo of Hugh Jackman in "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" by Michael Muller / 20th Century Fox








I for one am dying to see the movie finished in the theater. Seeing it 1/2 completed will spoil it for me.
Posted by: jj the gooch | April 24, 2009 at 05:14 PM
Boring! who cares?
Posted by: gregory kilker | April 24, 2009 at 06:37 PM
Boring,who cares?
Posted by: gregory kilker | April 24, 2009 at 06:39 PM
I've seen the print, and I think that FOX itself leaked the print to the pirates as an experiment. It's really interesting to the audience to see the slugs and half-completed FX sequences as part of a very high-quality print that was most likely made directly from a copy of Final Cut. It would make a very interesting "bonus item" on the Blu-ray disk. Instead, most will hear the rumors. Those who almost never go to cartoon movies may actually go to see the final sequences. And fans will definitely be pulled in. Yes, friends, I think it's very effective viral marketing.
Posted by: Jim H | April 24, 2009 at 07:34 PM
And what's the whopper?
Posted by: David Blackburn | April 24, 2009 at 09:27 PM
It's not the same to watch an unfinished movie. I'll rather pay my 10 bucks or 2 dollars in dvd rental instead.
Posted by: Wendy | April 24, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Rothman continues to disappoint fellow Fox employees. The end is near for the current regime.
Posted by: John A | April 24, 2009 at 11:03 PM
Rothman continues to frustrate and disappoint fellow Fox employees. The end for this regime is near.
Posted by: John A | April 24, 2009 at 11:09 PM
This editorial infers that Fox is the bad guy in protecting their investment. I wounder how the LA Times would feel if an employee was pre-releasing it paper? Who would the bad guy if that happened?
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2009 at 06:21 AM
It's a shame the unfinished copy got out and a shame people downloaded it. Any real fan should supoprt the studio and people who made the movie. DON'T STEAL.
I will be there on friday to see the movie how is was intended to be shown.
Posted by: Nappy | April 25, 2009 at 09:11 AM