The Big Picture

Patrick Goldstein and James Rainey
on entertainment and media

« Previous Post | The Big Picture Home | Next Post »

The secret history of why Disney dumped 'Narnia'

On the night before Christmas, when all of Hollywood was in Aspen or Hawaii on vacation, Disney quietly announced that it was bailing out on the "Chronicles of Narnia" franchise that the studio had co-financed and co-produced with Phil Anschutz's Walden Media. I was blissfully snoozing on the beach when the story broke in the trades myself, so it was only after I started analyzing Disney's 2008 for our continuing Studio Report Card series that I realized what a shocker it was. Totaled together, the first two "Narnia" films grossed nearly $1.2 billion around the world, making it one of the most successful box-office franchises in recent years.

So why would Disney walk away from such a valuable property? The back story is complicated, to say the least. The obvious reason was that compared to the astounding success of the first film, 2005's "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe," which amassed nearly $750 million in global business, the second film in the series, 2008's "Prince Caspian," was a big disappointment, grossing roughly $420 million. Still, $420 million is nothing to sneeze at, being way more money than any Disney film, except for "Wall-E," made all year.


But it turns out that "Prince Caspian" didn't just bring in less money, but it cost more to make and market--a lot more. Disney acknowledges that the film cost roughly $225 million, with nearly $100 million of that going for the film's elaborate special effects. Even worse, because the studio was trying to expand the series' audience by going after teen moviegoers as well as families, Disney overspent on marketing, with some insiders estimating that the studio spent as much as $175 million on worldwide marketing for the film.

But what really derailed Disney's involvement with "Narnia" was a nasty feud between the studio and Phil Anschutz, the real estate baron and supporter of Christian conservative causes who seems to own half of America. Anschutz has a stake in or outright ownership of Regal Entertainment Group (the nation's biggest movie theater chain),  Staples Center, the Kodak Theatre, the Los Angeles Galaxy, the L.A. Kings, London's Millennium Dome, a string of U.S. newspapers (including the San Francisco Examiner) and Walden Media, which has produced such films as "Journey to the Center of the Earth," "Nim's Island" and "Because of Winn-Dixie." So when Anschutz gets into an ugly dispute with Disney, we're talking about a true battle of the titans.

What happened? Keep reading: 

According to multiple sources, the once-close relationship between Disney and Walden began to unravel when, after the first "Narnia" film cleaned up at the box office, Anschutz essentially put a gun to Disney's head and demanded that the studio renegotiate its deal with Walden. Anschutz insisted that Disney either gave back a sizable chunk of the studio's lucrative distribution fee or Anschutz would distribute the "Narnia" series on his own. Believing the franchise was too good to give up, Disney reluctantly changed the terms of its Walden deal, but the renegotiation poisoned relations between the two behemoths. When the second film faltered, there was so little good will left over that Disney had far less qualms about cutting its ties with the franchise.

To be fair, Walden wasn't all that happy with the way Disney handled the film. The first movie had been released at Christmas, which seemed a logical slot for a family-oriented picture. But when Disney saw that "Prince Caspian" was an edgier, more youth-oriented film, it decided to go after teenagers as well as family filmgoers. That decision led to what, in hindsight, appears to be a huge blunder, releasing "Prince Caspian" in May, at the start of summer. Sandwiched between "Iron Man" and "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull," "Prince Caspian" not only failed to attract many teenagers, but it lost a large piece of its family following, who were turned off by the edgier, not especially well-focused marketing materials.

"We felt that, for that film, we had to try to appeal to every audience," says Disney studio chief Dick Cook. "The movie was edgier and tougher and the marketing materials reflected that. Sometimes when you do that, you risk alienating the families and maybe that's what happened." Cook defended the studio's decision to put the movie into the summer. "Warners has always been able to move 'Harry Potter' back and forth, so we thought we had just as good a chance of doing well. Honestly, who knows--it may have been a factor. In the summertime, you don't get always get many second chances. But release dates are funny--they never seem to effect a movie people really want to see." 

Walden is moving ahead with plans to make a third book in the series, "The Voyage of the Dawn Treader," which will have a new director, Michael Apted, at the helm but much of the cast, including Ben Barnes (Prince Caspian), from the previous films. The book is said to be far more commercial than the last installment, being more of a classic boy's seagoing adventure story, complete with fantastic sights, dragons, wizards and sea serpents, not to mention Eustace Scrubb, who I hear on good authority is one of the most inspired rotten kids in English literature. The real fascinating question is: Who will release it? Walden could announce a new deal as early as later this week.

It doesn't have a lack of suitors. The studio with the inside track is 20th Century Fox, which has first dibs on the project, since it already markets and distributes Walden projects under its Fox-Walden banner. Fox has plenty of interest, having seriously considered acquiring the movie rights to the C.S. Lewis books even before Walden originally landed the franchise. Fox has a strong marketing department, with lot of success with family entertainment--the studio's biggest hits last year were both family films, "Horton Hears a Who" and the year-ending "Marley & Me."

But Fox is famous for driving hard bargains and exercising fiscal discipline, so don't expect to see "Dawn Treader" costing anywhere near $225 million. Walden has been aiming to bring the new film in at around $140 million, which would be a far more enticing price tag for a 50/50 studio partner. If Fox passes, both Sony and Warners have expressed strong interest in the project. It would be a good fit for either studio, giving Sony something it hasn't had in recent years--a fantasy-oriented family franchise, while it could provide Warners with a ready-made family-oriented franchise to replace the soon-to-be completed "Harry Potter" series. Whatever happens, it seems likely that "Narnia" fans will soon have another chance to visit the enchanted world of Narnia and other distant lands.

Photo: Sergio Castellitto in "The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian." Photo credit: Dieny Enterprises/Walden Media


Comments () | Archives (36)

The comments to this entry are closed.

I don't know how people can be so blind.

Audiences didn't go see Prince Caspian for one reason:

They felt it was going to be as tepid, watered-down and kiddie-oriented as the first one.

That it wasn't -- that it was actually a good fantasy film for all ages (without pandering to toddlers and neurotic parents) came as knowledge too little too late at a time period saturated with films audiences felt were more their speed.

If Walden wants to blunder again, they'll reduce the budget like they plan to, and force the director to make a cute and cuddly "family" film, the kind that appeals to parents of five-year olds and overly sensitive "Christians" living in the Bible Belt.

In which case, say goodbye to seeing the rest of the Narnia series and any hope of capturing the aesthetic wonder of Lewis' books -- which despite the changes Adamson made to PC (and necessary ones) -- he managed to get right.

Oh wait, I forgot, you idiots are still complaining over the innocent kiss between Susan and Caspian. The franchise is dead before it even began.

well that's disappointing... honestly I thought it was a great movie. but I suppose not everyone thought so. Well I just hope they find someone else and that the next movie does much better because the story means a lot to many, many people... I hoped the movies would too. I mean they're obviously better than the "Harry Potter" movies.

and I completely agree with the comment above mine!

"Disgusted" said: "[...]any hope of capturing the aesthetic wonder of Lewis' books -- which despite the changes Adamson made to PC (and necessary ones) -- he managed to get right."

I wonder if you read the books, or watched both movies. The first movie "captured the aesthetic wonder of Lewis' books" in a much better way than PC did, and the changes made by Adamson were far from necessary...

Your comment leaves the impression that you are not really a fan of C.S. Lewis' works, nor are familiar with his background and beliefs...

Overly sensitive "Christians" living in the Bible Belt comprise the biggest watching group for this movie. As a proud Christian, I enjoyed it.

The biggest problem with these movies is that they try to pad very slim little stories into 2-hour features. Any adult should be able to read any of the Narnia books in a day or a single weekend at the most.

If they had been 80 minute movies like the standard Diseny cartoons (and let's face it, movies with this much CGI are really just cartoons as well) they'd be fantastic.

The changes made in the Prince Caspian movie were unnecessary and tactless. It's really soured me on the whole franchise, and I probably won't go see Voyage, even if it does come out.

IMO, to have a good franchise, the movies have to fit together well, and it's too late for Chronicles even though the first film was excellent.

Thanks for the info. I really hope they make the rest of the series. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader and The Magician's Nephew are my favorite books, and both have the great cinematic potential. Like all Lewis fans, I have to agree that Prince Caspian is the clunker of the series.

@JGeisinger, I totally disagree with your comment about the Harry Potter movies. (And am not even sure why the Narnia movies are "obviously" better.) The Harry Potter films are fabulous, and more importantly to this discussion, are adapted very closely from the books. This is a great strength, and was one of the weaknesses of the Prince Caspian film.

I also think the rest of the Narnia series would do well to stick to a certain release date. It worked well for LOTR.

I think they did Narnia very well in two hours they would suck animated and you know that. I have been a fan of Narnia since grade three and i think i would say i was a little disapointed on the fact they added scenes but they were very well done so yam. The producer have to have thought that if they had not made the first one so kiddy (not saying it wasnt good i loved it) maybe more people would have seen prince caspian!!!!!!! i love NArnia i hope they make a third one i will be in the theater the first night.

Thank you for your article, Mr. Goldstein. I loved the Narnia books, and VDT was my favorite in the series. I can't wait until the movie comes out!

« | 1 2 3 4 | »


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:

About the Bloggers



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: