The Big Picture

Patrick Goldstein and James Rainey
on entertainment and media

« Previous Post | The Big Picture Home | Next Post »

'Milk' star Sean Penn: Pal of anti-gay dictators?

PennI'm not surprised to discover that Sean Penn is under attack again for his outspoken admiration of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Cuba's Raul Castro. The real shocker is who's doing the attacking: The Advocate, America's leading gay publication. James Kirchick, an assistant editor at the New Republic, pretty much eviscerates Penn, who just wrote a cover story in the Nation singing the praises of both Latin American dictators. Up until now, in the wake of his bravura performance as gay activist Harvey Milk in "Milk," the mainstream entertainment press hasn't bothered to ask Penn any tough questions about his political views.

But the Advocate doesn't pull any punches. Saying Penn is likely to win all sorts of prizes from prominent gay organizations for his role, Kirchick writes that "Penn's political activism, irrespective of his views on gay rights, negates the values for which a movement based upon individual freedom must stand." Kirchick calls Penn's Nation story a "love letter" to the dictators, comparing it to the notorious dispatches starry-eyed liberals sent back home during the early years of the Soviet Union, describing it as a worker's paradise, "neglecting to mention anything about the gulag, the 'disappearance' of political dissidents or any other such inconvenient truths about Communism."

Penn, who received a Golden Globe nomination today for his performance in "Milk," seems to have forgotten that not long after Fidel Castro took power, the Cuban government ordered the internment of gay people in prison labor camps where, as Kirchick puts it, "they were murdered or worked to death for their 'counterrevolutionary tendencies.' " He adds that Penn's pal, Raul Castro, was notorious for executing political opponents, whose only crime was often their homosexuality. Though Cuba has since decriminalized homosexuality, the government still bans all gay organizations or any other group critical of the regime.

Thor Halvorssen, president of the respected Human Rights Foundation, also takes aim at the actor in the piece, calling the Castro brothers "thugs and murderers," saying "that Sean Penn would be honored by anyone, let alone the gay community, for having stood by a dictator that put gays into concentration camps is mind-boggling." I'm an old leftie myself. But having grown up in Miami, where I saw up close and personal the flood of people--straight and gay--fleeing persecution in Cuba, I no longer share Penn's naive admiration for totalitarian despots who pass themselves off as populist heroes.

In an era of softball showbiz journalism where newspapers and magazines--including my own paper--rarely ask actors or filmmakers any inconvenient questions about their political beliefs, I'm not holding my breath that anyone will be holding Penn's feet to the fire. Kudos to the Advocate for reminding us that it was Harvey Milk who said that gay rights are human rights and it is Penn "who discredits both when he rushes to the defense of thugs who posture as victims of the West."

It raises a fair question that I'd like to hear your opinions on: Should we only concern ourselves with Penn's wondrous work as an actor in "Milk," which coming in the wake of the controversy over Proposition 8 will surely remind people that the struggle for gay rights in America is far from over? Or does his offscreen embrace of gay-bashing dictators matter just as much as his onscreen artistry, especially when the views of his political heroes so completely conflict with the free-speech message of the man he celebrates in "Milk"?

Photo of Sean Penn in "Milk" by Phil Bray / Focus Features

 
Comments () | Archives (55)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Patrick Goldstein is either a panderer to the imperialist status quo, or very uneducated, or an extreme "greed is good" gospel right-winger. He should be writing for the pentagon or the John Birch people, not the LA times.

I was born in Venezuela and, though I live in the US, still have family, friends and former colleagues there, thus I'm better informed of what goes on in the Chávez regime than most posters here.
Chávez, a charismatic figure who rose to prominence while imprisoned (pardoned by a president Caldera right before the end of his term, for an attempted coup in which hundreds of people died - but let's leave that aside) came to power after 40 years of bipartisan indifference for the population and remarkable corruption, because he was saying all the right things. People were tired and ready for a new message.
Promptly, Chavez started changing everything: the Constitution, the Electoral College, the Supreme Court. He took advantage of the trust voters put in him, to ensure there wouldn't be checks and balances in his government. As a result, we now have reelection in Venezuela -which wasn't possible before- and, after eight years, he's still in power, and still trying to find ways to stay there indefinitely. Corruption is at least as bad as before, there's no real freedom of the press, and there's a host of other problems that there's no room to discuss here.
But to all the "Chavez is not a dictator" apologists: wake up. I happen to be staunchly against the Chen... er, Bush administration, but that shouldn't automatically make me fall in love with Chavez. He is not good for the country, and he's not good for the region. And he is NOT interested in Democracy.
Mark my words.

Ok, he's an actor first and foremost. Why are you getting all upset about a actor's opinion? He'll do anything in front of a camera for money and when he's not "acting" he's just another joe with an opinion which doesn't count anymore than my little skimpy post here. Who Cares?

The thing about some of the movie folk is they know a lot, but not nearly as much as they don't.

I can't stand this guy. I don't care who Harvey Milk was or was not. I'm never going to like a gay Icon nor will I try to wish him harm. Man, I wish movies were fun like they used to be. Aside from films based on comics I've read they seem to such out loud. I'm getting off point, I can't stand these people. THey refused to stand up for those Mohammed cartoonists and refused to denounce the murder of that Dutch filmmaker. If they don't care about denouncing what happened to Theo Van Gogh, I hate to think if they care about our fate, and we've paid out money for their work. It's just not worth the worry.

That... and they made a gay film called 'Milk'. That just sounds disgusting.

Where on earth does Patrick Goldstein get info about Raul Castro being an anti-gay dictator.?He listens to his daughter Mariela, who is an ardent gay rights activist. The author of this article is sadly mistaken and needs to check his facts before bleating. I think he confuses "Raul" with "Fidel."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7314845.stm

 
« | 1 2 3 4 5 6

Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:



About the Bloggers


Categories


Archives
 


Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: