Technology

The business and culture of our digital lives,
from the L.A. Times

« Previous Post | Technology Home | Next Post »

What Marissa Mayer said about Google and Twitter

May 8, 2009 |  6:18 pm

There have been a couple of posts today speculating about what Eric Schmidt and his team said about Twitter at a company press event in Mountain View, Calif., on Thursday. I have the verbatim text, which I thought might be helpful to post below for the record.

The precise question to Schmidt was about the evolution of Google's thinking on what some people call micro-messaging.

"Is this code for Twitter?" Schmidt asked. "The term I've been using is micro-blogging."

Yes, it was code for Twitter. From there, Schmidt bounced the question to search products chief Marissa Mayer, who explained that Google was interested in the possibilities for micro-messaging/micro-blogging, particularly from the search perspective. She said:

"What's really happening in Twitter is that there are a lot of clues in it in terms of what's happening that's interesting overall. It's similar to what we see in Google Trends, where people will often type what they're interested in into the search box, and we can make some predictions off of that.
 
So we are interested in being able to offer, for example, micro-blogging and micro-messaging in our search. Particularly in Blog Search and possibly in Web Search, but we don't have any particular plans to announce."

Not a lot surprising here. As you might expect for a search company, Google wants to find some way to mine and analyze the exploding volume of information being churned out by the micro-messaging world (read: Twitter). As Mayer suggests, figuring out what's trending in real-time could have implications for how Google orders other kinds of search results, whether it's in news, blog or Web search. 

Nothing was said about Google creating a competitor to Twitter, nor was it implied.

Which is not to say Google's isn't planning such a thing. The company would be negligent if it wasn't at least talking about how to beat Twitter. But its executives definitely aren't talking about it to us.

-- David Sarno


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

The term "micro-messaging" needs to die a quick and painful death. The term makes no sense whatsoever. "Microblogging" is a much better fit and is already already used by most people.

That's cool. Nice to see verbatim text. I should have looked for it. Literal stated plans are usual fairly mundane. On a good day more interesting choices are made. Even then it often doesn't work out. Funny that Google Blogsearch would even come up, as that's a total snoozer. Woe to the google if the best they've got to bring to the super-hot microblogging scene is a Google Blogsearch strategy. I mean seriously - this is social graph/real time/shared links/location perhaps. This is one of the definitive technologies of the era and Mayer references a half attended-to technology from 3 years ago? That would be like Yahoo saying their Twitter strategy is delicious.

Google can just buy friendfeed back in a few months, once it's working really well. And provide all sorts hosted micro-blogging of solutions based on the open-source Jaiku code.

Friendfeed is already much more powerful than twitter on many aspects.

It's kind of the same way using Open Social and FriendConnect that Google is going to take over facebook. Even though all users are not going to migrate overnight, they can easily migrate in a few months. The more and more people will register accounts and import all their feeds in the Google products, the faster the migration of all the users will happen.



Advertisement


Recent Posts
A wheel that teaches kids how to ride a bike |  November 24, 2009, 3:49 pm »
Vudu does Wikipedia |  November 24, 2009, 9:00 am »





Archives