The Fabulous Forum

The who, what, where, when,
why — and why not — of L.A. sports

Category: Jerry Buss

Ted Green: There's still a doctor in the house

July 31, 2009 | 10:30 am

Buss Years ago, more than I care to remember or admit, I was introduced to this soft-spoken man in his mid-40s who seemed quite odd in that he was both modest and Mitty-esque in his grandiose thinking.

He owned the L.A. Strings at the time, which was a tennis team in a fledgling minor league called World Team Tennis. The Strings were a back-page item, definitely not of philharmonic quality.

After we both did our due diligence on his new tennis endeavor, Dr. Jerry Buss paused to make sure he had my full attention.

"I'm going to own the Lakers one day," he told me, and I thought: Yeah, and I'm going to be the first man on Mars.

Just a few years later, he bought the Lakers. And within months, Magic Johnson had come to town. Now, after nine NBA titles and 15 appearances in the NBA Finals in a 30-year ownership run that should/must land him in the Basketball Hall of Fame, Jerry Buss is still full of surprises. And not a man you should ever underestimate.

The man with a PhD in chemistry from USC and a penchant for dating women who are so age inappropriate that other men get jealous played a high-stakes game of contract chicken with Lamar Odom and Lamar's peeps ... and darn it if the good doctor didn't win again.

Yeah, Lamar blinked first. Kenny Rogers would be proud. Odom knew when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em.

Continue reading »

Bleacher Report: Losing Lamar won't hurt the Lakers

July 20, 2009 | 12:27 pm

Odom From the Bleacher Report:

All the pundits and fans are wringing out their crying towels. Oh, what a tragedy if the Lakers lose Lamar Odom. What a terrible deal it amounts to! Odom and Trevor Ariza for Ron Artest.

"It’s just not worth it," they cry. You lose two and get only one in return. But that one player that you get is worth the other two. Why? Because he WANTS to be a Laker. And he doesn’t care about the money.

The other two just wanted their egos stroked. Show me how important I am to this team by putting out some extra loot.

Well, I’m glad Jerry Buss showed Ariza and Odom how important they were. He let Ariza go without a second thought and brought in Artest. He also pulled the offer to Odom, who showed his appreciation by actually considering offers from other teams worth far less money.

Buss proved once again that no one is going to hold him hostage even if he has to break up the team. He did it back in 2004 and he will do it again if he has to. And good for him.

Continue reading »

Ted Green: Lakers need to put up the money

July 9, 2009 |  6:54 pm

Odom I'm no Alan Greenspan when it comes to finance, but let's start with a very basic premise, no advanced degree required:

The Lakers and the luxury tax seem about as comfortable together in the same sentence as Barack Obama and Sarah Palin.

I bring it up because the Lakers seem to be playing the luxury tax card as they talk vaguely about what they can and cannot afford to pay their free-agent forward, Lamar Odom.

The versatile Odom made about $14 million in 2009. Now there are hints about offering him the mid-level exception of $5-plus million, something like a 60% pay cut.

You want to cut somebody? Ask Andrew Bynum to give some of that 52 mil back.

Now, it's not my place to spend Jerry Buss' money. If he wants to blow some of it on poker, 21 being a great number for both blackjack and girlfriends, that's his business. But riddle me this:

If the Cleveland Cavaliers can pay THEIR power forward, the klunky Anderson Varejao, $50 million and he's about a quarter as good as Lamar Odom, are the Lakers telling us they can't pay a talent like Odom $8 to $10 million?

Continue reading »

Lakers the biggest, best show in town

June 8, 2009 |  3:12 pm

Lakers Washington Post columnist Michael Wilbon no doubt will raise some eyebrows in Boston when he pronounces that the Lakers are the world's most important basketball franchise.

That's sort of the inference we got from NBA Commissioner David Stern a few years ago when asked which teams he would like to see play in the Finals. The Lakers versus the Lakers, he said.

As Wilbon points out, it's difficult for the Celtics to claim the title, despite all the championships they've won, because they're not even the most popular sports team in their city. That would be the Red Sox, by far.

"The most famous names of all here are Laker names: Wilt, West and Baylor," Wilbon writes.

"Kareem and Magic, Shaq and Kobe, Buss and Jackson. The Lakers aren't the only show in town -- but they're the biggest, the best and the most important."

"That's because the Lakers, arguably, are the most important basketball franchise in the world. Yes, the Celtics have won more league championships, 17 to the Lakers' 14. But of the 60 NBA Finals in league history, the Lakers have played in 29. And it's likely that seven of the top 50 players in the history of the game are Lakers.

"It is, simply, the greatest show in American sports, barely interrupted for the past 50 years.''

-- Randy Harvey

Photo: Fans celebrate as the Lakers defeat the Orlando Magic in Game 2 of the NBA Finals at the Staples Center on Sunday. Credit: Jeff Golden / Getty Images


Los Angeles owners a mixed bag in Sports Illustrated's Best & Worst list

May 12, 2009 |  2:29 pm

Lakers owner Jerry Buss getting his star on the Hollywood Walk of fame in 2006. It stressed that this list was by no means scientific, but Sports Illustrated cited numerous factors when putting together its Best and Worst Owners list in the four major professional sports, the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL. SI says the factors included the owners' willingness to spend money to improve the team, stability in the front office and management, amenities at the team's venue, how the team interacts with its fan base and one more important factor -- the team's overall success. Boil those five factors together and you'll see some of our L.A. owners on that list.

Continue reading »

He thinks the Lakers are crying poor

December 9, 2008 |  8:15 pm

A confession up front: I don't know any more about the Lakers' actual finances than you do. Which is to say, nothing at all.

But when I read stories in relation to, say, whether the Lakers should or will re-sign an emerging and valuable asset like Trevor Ariza, and the Lakers use having to pay the luxury tax as a potential excuse in case they need it, I don't know whether to laugh or lose my lunch.

Jerry Buss got a star on the Walk of Fame in 2006. See, I was there in '78 when Jerry Buss bought the whole shooting match from Jack Kent Cooke -- that's the Lakers, hockey Kings and the Fabulous Forum (the building in Inglewood, and here a picture of both the man and the building (here's a photo) for $38 million, chump change by today's standards. The Steal of the Century.

Today, even in this last-place economy, Forbes estimates the Lakers are worth about $600 million. If Hollywood's team ever went up for sale on the open market, I bet they'd fetch more.

So, if Jerry Buss bought the team for $38 mil, AND it's now worth $600 mil, AND the team is currently profitable, AND the other Laker owner, Philip Anschutz, is said to be worth $8 billion (yes, the "B" word) ... someone please explain, why in the name of Jack Benny would the Lakers ever, and I mean ever, use the luxury tax as an excuse, much less cry about it in the papers?

Luxury tax? For the Lakers?

Luxury tax for a team whose sushi roll at Staples Center costs the same as a four-door KIA with leather seats?

In the big financial Laker picture, the luxury tax for Ariza is comparative pennies.

Did George Steinbrenner ever once choose the cheapskate route for the Yankees, baseball's gold standard?

So why would the Lakers' front office ever cry poor, especially when Buss has Daddy Warbucks Anschutz as a partner?

I'm not trying to fritter away John, Jim and Jeanie's family fortune, nor am I telling the Lakers how to spend it. That said, I'm pretty sure the words "Lakers" and "luxury tax" should never be used in the same sentence.

You are the Lakers, not the Atlanta Hawks.

You have enough money to buy LeBron James, Dwight Howard and Yao Ming as your third-string center.

Luxury tax and the Lakers?

Reminds me of other famous oxymorons, like Iraq and Mission Accomplished.

-- Ted Green

Ted Green was the L.A. Times beat writer when Jerry Buss bought the Lakers. He is currently Senior Sports Producer for KTLA Prime News.

Inset photo: Jerry Buss got a star on the Walk of Fame in 2006. Credit: Spencer Weiner / Los Angeles Times
Pop-up photo: Jack Kent Cooke at the 1966 groundbreaking for the Forum. Credit: AP


Knicks worth more than the Lakers, Forbes says

December 3, 2008 |  3:45 pm

Bussjerrynew

Why is this man smiling?

List-happy Forbes magazine came out with its latest tally today, and according to its calculations the New York Knicks are the most valuable franchise in the NBA and are worth $613 million. And Jerry Buss' Lakers are No. 2 on the list at $584 million.

The rest of the top 10 valuations: Chicago Bulls ($504 million), Detroit Pistons ($480 million), Cleveland Cavaliers ($477 million), Houston Rockets ($469 million), Dallas Mavericks ($466 million), Phoenix Suns ($452 million), Boston Celtics ($447 million) and San Antonio Spurs ($415 million).

The magazine also says that the Bulls enjoyed the biggest operating profit in the last year at $55.4 million, with the Lakers again being the runner-up with an operating profit of $47.9 million (on $191 million in revenues).

Forbes claims all top 10 NBA teams are profitable, with one exception -- Mark Cuban's Mavericks posted an operating loss of $13.6 million.

-- Barry Stavro

Photo: Jerry Buss, owner of the Los Angeles Lakers, is all smiles after being honored with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in Los Angeles in October 2006. Credit: Spencer Weiner / Los Angeles Times.


Jerry Buss entertains the media

November 9, 2008 |  7:37 pm

Buss_300Unlike last year, when Lakers owner Jerry Buss (pictured at left) sat with the media during training camp in Hawaii and the attention was on whether the Lakers would trade Kobe Bryant, Buss smiled more and was upbeat when he talked to the media Sunday.

Buss, 75, talked about the future with Bryant, his children, Lakers General Manager Mitch Kupchak and how good this team is.

Bryant is making $21.2 million this year, but can terminate the last two years of his deal worth $47.8 million this summer and sign a maximum extension of five years and $135 million.

Buss said the team wasn’t ready to address that issue.

"But we can’t afford to lose Kobe," Buss said.

Another option for Bryant might be going to Europe. There was a rumor that Olympiakos, a team in Greece, would be willing to make Bryant an offer this summer.

"I can’t see it, but there are people who are wealthy enough in the world that could make astronomical offers and I certainly couldn’t compete with that," Buss said. "But, quite honestly, I don’t think that’s a real threat."

Kupchak acquired Pau Gasol and Trevor Ariza and drafted Andrew Bynum. It seems as if Kupchak has done a very good job for the Lakers.

"I’ve always been pleased with everything that Mitch has done," Buss said. "It may seem as if there are ups and downs, but our relationship has never been up and down. It’s been totally steady."

Jeanie Buss, the team’s vice president of business operations who dates Lakers Coach Phil Jackson, and Jim Buss, the team’s vice president of player personnel, are Jerry’s two kids with big roles in the organization.

Jerry said he has been comfortable with them.

"At this point, I’m just really, really pleased with their performances," Jerry Buss said.

The Lakers are considered the favorites to win the NBA championship this year. There has been talk about them winning 70 games. The Chicago Bulls own the all-time mark with a 72-10 record.

Buss said he sees the Lakers winning 60 games.

"I’d be happy with 73, though," Buss said, smiling.

-- Broderick Turner


Assessing the political pulse from L.A. sports figures

November 2, 2008 |  8:56 pm

Baron_300Conventional wisdom says sports is a safe topic to discuss around the dinner table. Politics? Don’t even go there.

But that doesn’t mean they can’t be intertwined. You can poll athletes about where they stand on the election. That’s what a former colleague at the Syracuse student newspaper, The Daily Orange, attempted four years ago. Or you can prognosticate on who coaches likely would support.

Or you can remember Journalism 101, where you watched All the President’s Men, which chronicled the Watergate investigation by Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. Deep Throat told Woodward to "follow the money" to uncover the truth. That advice is also an easy method to see whether any of our sports figures wear blue or red, assuming they donate at least $250.

Records suggest more sports figures in Los Angeles support Barack Obama.

Lakers Coach Phil Jackson gave $2,300 to Barack Obama’s campaign. Johnny Buss, son of Lakers owner Jerry Buss, donated amounts of $250 five times to the Democratic candidate. David Secor, UCLA’s senior associate athletic director, donated $250 once.

Magic Johnson took an interesting approach. He donated $2,300 to Obama’s campaign last year before making two separate donations of $2,300 to Hillary Clinton nearly five months later.

Clippers guard Baron Davis (pictured above) doubles Jackson in two separate contributions to Obama’s campaign. He was master of ceremonies at an event for Obama and even rebutted Wizards guard Gilbert Arenas, who said he didn’t want Obama to win because his taxes would be too high.

That might be why former Dodgers owner Peter O’Malley spent $2,300 on John McCain’s campaign. Current Dodgers President Jamie McCourt gave the same amount to Christopher Dodd. Ducks defenseman Chris Pronger hoped his $2,000 would help Rudolph Giuliani win the primary.

But the race is between McCain and Obama. And on Tuesday, we’ll find out who the American people, including our sports figures, will elect as president.

-- Mark Medina

Photo credit: Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times


Owners, not players, top Forbes' rich of the super-rich

October 20, 2008 | 12:35 pm

Mark Cuban Forbes magazine's September issue includes its annual list of the 400 richest Americans. Two notable names not on their list of the "athletically affluent": Lakers' owner Jerry Buss and Beverly Hills landlord and Clippers' owner Donald Sterling.

Here are the top 10 richest sports owners from the Forbes list:

1.) E. Stanley Kroenke ($3.5 billion) and his wife, Ann Walton Kroenke ($3.4 billion). Stan owns the Denver Nuggets and Colorado Avalanche and has stakes in the St. Louis Rams and the English soccer team Arsenal.

2.) Mark Cuban ($2.6 billion) owns the Dallas Mavericks and is bidding to buy the Chicago Cubs, currently owned by Tribune Co., publisher of the L.A. Times.

3.) Malcolm Glazer and family ($2.3 billion) counts the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Manchester United of the English Premier League among his holdings.

4.) H. Wayne Huizenga ($2.2 billion). He hired Bill Parcells to revive his struggling Miami Dolphins.

5.) Michael E. Heisley Sr. ($2.1 billion) owns the struggling Memphis Grizzlies, but has been trying to sell the team.

6.) B. Thomas Golisano ($1.7 billion), owner of the Buffalo Sabres.

7.) Michael Illitch ($1.6 billion) from Detroit got rich from the Little Caesars Pizza chain and he owns the Detroit Tigers and Detroit Red Wings.

8.) Drayton McLane Jr. ($1.6 billion) owns Houston Astros.

9.) Jeremy Jacbos ($1.6 billion) is much derided in Boston. He owns the Boston Bruins and the TD Banknorth Garden, where the Bruins and Celtics play, plus a piece of the New England Sports Network that telecasts Red Sox games.

10.) Robert Kraft ($1.5 billion), much beloved in Boston for his ownership of the New England Patriots and his hiring of Bill Belichick.

-- Barry Stavro

Photo: Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban looks on as his team is introduced before facing the Denver Nuggets in the first quarter of an NBA game in Denver on March 27. Credit: David Zalubowski  / Associated Press



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
The Fabulous Forum is written by the entire Sports department of the L.A. Times.



Categories


Archives
 




Buy Tickets
Search for Tickets
 

LATimes.com now offers sports tickets to popular sporting events around the world including basketball tickets, baseball tickets, and football tickets to otherwise sold-out events.

Popular Events
As the Dodgers are playing tough in the NL West, Dodgers tickets have been selling great all season. LA Angels tickets are as always a big hit, and there are plenty of fans looking for Athletics tickets and Padres tickets too.

USC Trojans football tickets are also in high demand, as the NCAA football season starts up again.
Powered by TicketNetwork