'Hell's Kitchen': And then there were two

Stop the presses! Chef Ramsay smiled!

A near-perfect dinner service led Chef Ramsay to actually bust out a grin and praise his underlings for  "bloody great service." But that lasted all of two seconds. It was soon time to put someone on the chopping block. And it was Andrea.

Who would have predicted that quiet-as-a-church-mouse Paula and redneck Danny (his description) would be the last two chefs standing?

When the field started with 16, it looked like Ben or Giovanni or even Andrea would be among the final contestants. And Andrea nearly made it to the end through sheer willpower and despite numerous flops in the kitchen. But it all caught up with her Thursday night, when Chef Ramsay sent her packing.

The night started with visits from friends and family but quickly shifted gears into a brilliant challenge that should become a "Hell's Kitchen" mainstay: practically a who's who of Los Angeles chefs (Mark Peel, Suzanne Goin, Celestino Drago, etc.) were in Hell's Kitchen to judge the final three contestants' dishes. "Los Angeles must be starving because you're all here," Chef Ramsay joked.

Seriously though, scheduling that must have been a nightmare. But it was worth any hassle. The judging elite was unanimous: Danny's dish was the dog's dinner, and Paula's was the best. The win earned Paula a makeover, and a segment on Fox's morning show.

When the three chefs took their turns running the kitchen -- perhaps the marquee challenge in "Hell's Kitchen" -- Paula stumbled badly, as Chef Ramsay said, like a "mouse with no voice." Danny's voice cracked like a 13-year-old boy asking a girl out on a date. And Andrea overcompensated -- putting on her "assertive panties," as she put it -- and is lucky that Chef Scott didn't kill her. ("She was riding him like a donkey," Paula quipped.)

So who do you think it will be? Paula or Danny? I think Paula has the edge. I think both chefs have the skills and the smarts to be molded into Chef Ramsay's image. But Danny has had a few slip-ups, taste-wise. (And apparently more to come with the final challenge, when the chefs must open their own restaurants. To the designer's apparent horror, Danny suggests mounting fish as part of the decor.) And there's no way that Chef Ramsay can teach him that.

The single funniest moment of the night -- and perhaps of the entire season -- was the "spark" between Paula and Jean-Philippe. Do you think? Could it really be??

-- Rene Lynch

Comments

[David]

I truly believe that the screening process of contestants need to be more stringent as this year's season of Hell's Kitchen (US version) was daunting to watch at times. After having to deal with watching Lacey stumble around like an oaf for 8 or 9 weeks, it really makes one wonder how some of them made it THAT long into the season, let alone even make the final list!

Given that, I knew it would come down to these two, but if that one girl (I forget her name) didn't injure herself in that one episode and was still in the race, she would be in the finals easy without question. That must have really hurt her to see the fumbling around of her co-chefs in what almost appeared to be Ringling Bros. in the kitchen while this played out on TV this season.

Paula has some chops, but she is about as aggressive and understated as they come. Danny hasn't felt the blunt of Ramsay's wrath most of the season and has escaped most of the scathing meltdown that went around to his cohorts, but lacks assertiveness, as well! I

It should prove to be interesting indeed at the end, but Danny's ignorance in the fine dining experience will probably be his demise as hanging fish mounts on the walls is not exactly what most master chefs would even dream of doing - not even as a joke. I was rooting for Danny all season, but the last two episodes barely give him enough stay to pull off the final slot...and I think Paula is more consistent in the long run and has more of an idea of fine dining overall.