'American Idol' Banter: Which David rules this playground?
In a 2006 talk about America's obsession with precociousness, "New Yorker" writer and noted Big Idea guy Malcolm Gladwell made an interesting observation about what it means to be an adult.
"What a gifted child is, in many ways, is a gifted learner," he said. "And what a gifted adult is, is a gifted doer. And those are quite separate domains of achievement."
I can't think of a better summation of the difference between the two nascent stars who stepped into the "Idol" ring for the final time Tuesday night. (That, by the way, will be this piece's only reference to boxing. Framing this episode as "Rocky VII" really didn't work, though one understands why the producers found it irresistible).
David Archuleta is this season's Wonder Kid, a prodigy so innocent he seems like he fell out of a book by J.D. Salinger. He's awash in natural talent: there's that gorgeous vocal tone, and his stunning instinct for finding a song's melodic contours. But he's also proven himself adept at absorbing guidance. Allowing Andrew Lloyd Webber to persuade him to open those fluttery baby browns -- a happy life lesson revisited tonight -- was an obvious case. The influence of his forceful dad, Jeff Archuleta, has been more fiercely scrutinized. But Archie's performances are what really prove that he's a gifted learner.
From his breakthrough "Imagine" (also reprised Tuesday, as a show-topper), to his reverential readings of Dolly Parton and Mariah Carey, to the uptempo numbers that foundered because he's just too uptight, Archuleta showed himself to be the ideal teacher's pet.
And his teacher? Certainly not judge Simon Cowell. No, it's pop itself, the clear source of all of this kid's comfort and emotional understanding. He is the latest embodiment of that wondrous, somewhat sad figure, the young dreamer who lives inside his chosen art form. The fondness many viewers feel for him reflects not only his singing talent but also the otherworldly aura that comes from Archie's utter absorption in the world of song. (That same quality makes others find him a bit creepy.)![]()
David Cook, on the other hand, is a red-blooded, baseball-loving, starlet-dating, all-American doer. He came to "Idol" fully formed, his alternative rock credentials forged in the bars of the dusty Great Plains. The judges like to call him "original," but the gift that kept pushing him forward this season was savvy.
He unearthed the little-known bar-band trick of interpreting R&B songs indie-rock style (Cincinnati band the Afghan Whigs might have started this tradition way back in the mid-1990s), chose relatively obscure numbers by mentors Neil Diamond and Parton, and promoted his favorite just-under-the-radar bands (tonight's was Collective Soul) whenever he could.
His demeanor is cool; his favorite vocal strategy is to pull the notes out ever so slightly, lagging behind a song's beat, to create a sultry kind of tension. America thought he'd learned this from Eddie Vedder, maybe, but during Webber week, Cook admitted he'd been into high school musicals, and that's probably where he picked up his impressively understated style of raising drama.
Cook did develop during this season; his fashion sense has improved, for one thing, though is a faux-hawk really better than a post-Beatles mop comb-over? More important, he figured out a way to negotiate success on "Idol" without compromising his commitment to whatever vision of "alternative" he's living. (Given that he's consistently chosen to cover songs by bands with a spiritual if not overtly Christian bent, I'd wager he's not the super-decadent type.)
It's important for Cook's career that he has fully taken on the maverick role that the "Idol" judges thrust upon him early on. "For me, this whole thing has been a progression," he announced in the face of Cowell's criticism that he hadn't reprised a past episode's hit. "Why do something I've already done?" That is how a rock star thinks, at least when he's young. There will be plenty of time for Cook to revisit past glories in a mid-life comeback, circa 2028.
Anyway, following Gladwell's logic, the doer should have outclassed the learner in this ultimate test of "Idol" prowess. For weeks, Cook has been the front-runner, growing ever more assured as Archuleta trembled, getting ready for his next role as Chris Daughtry's little bro on the meat-and-potatoes rock circuit.
But it was Archuleta's night. Cook was credible singing U2 and enthusiastic with the songwriting competition number he chose, and (I discovered, returning to the moment on YouTube.com), his cover of Collective Soul had more panache than the original. But this final contest just didn't seem that important to him, even when he dropped a few tears mid-show. "I'm playing in front of 7,000 people," he said. "I feel great." You could feel his anticipation of many more thousands of fans to come, and that confidence somehow lifted him away from the role of "American Idol."
Archuleta, on the other hand, went deep inside tonight, completely focusing on those ridiculously short performances, letting the world slip away. When he started to sing "Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Me," selected for him by Clive Davis, it seemed slightly ridiculous. One of Elton John and Bernie Taupin's most stentorian ballads, a favorite of Clay Aiken when he wanted to pull out his big gospel notes, the song expresses the despair of a tired, endangered lover, not a 17-year-old kid who murmurs "gosh!" when surrounded by cheerleaders.
But Archie pulled it off. Climbing the song's long crescendo as if it were a stairway to the throne, he left his student's desk for a few minutes and unleashed something visceral. Maybe the motivation behind Archie's reading was just his burning need to win, but whatever it was, it belonged 100% to him.
The rest was frosting -- two more excellent interpretations, and three moments with Ryan Seacrest, during which poor Little David could hardly speak. But as most "Idols" past know, it only takes one instance of convincing transformation to become the final Chosen One. Making the leap from learner to doer, David Archuleta grabbed that ring. No matter what the voters decide about the contest, which can't be summed up in one night, Archuleta was your "American Idol" this hour.
-- Ann Powers
Photos courtesy of Fox
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/816965/29299352
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'American Idol' Banter: Which David rules this playground?:
Boy did the judges call it wrong tonight. True, David Archuleta is an angel. An angel who's records I won't be buying, even though I have enjoyed listening to him on this tv show. Good luck to him, no matter what America decides.
Posted by: Donna | May 21, 2008 at 02:13 AM
Ann, I've had some trouble with you in the past as far as David A. is concerned, but you redeemed yourself tonight. I could not have said it better myself.
David Archuleta was absolutely superlative! I hope America got it right because that kid won the night and the season--hands down! Out of this world performances, just unreal. David A. deserves the crown, no question about it. Even Cook applauded David at the end of the program...as he should.
If David Archuleta doesn't win American Idol, there's something rotten in Denmark.
Posted by: Bookaholic | May 21, 2008 at 02:45 AM
Ann, I can't agree more with your observation tonight which is a far cry from what you have written early in the season about DA. These two competitors seems both nice, credible singer/person and worthy of being called American Idol. At the end of the day, it is a matter of preference of type of music.DC might win but DA has proven that he is real and not robotic and full of human emotion contrary to term geneticaly engineered. More power to both of them and hopefully.
Posted by: mikki | May 21, 2008 at 03:59 AM
Thank you Ann for providing an incredibly thoughtful take on last night's progress.
Early on this season, I knew you to be a fierce attacker on what you thought to be David Archuleta's hidden agenda, his seemingly impossible personality.
All I can say is: I'm glad you've come around. Haha.
The open objectivity is a welcome respite to the negative and cynical attitude usually going around these Idol segments. I hope others may find David to be as true and special as he really is.
Posted by: dannie | May 21, 2008 at 04:35 AM
Beautifully written. Your paridigm of gifted learner versus gifted doer is firm basis in judging the finals last evening. All along David Archueleta has been the more powerful of the two. Many factors contributed to Archuleta's success last night, but were you aware of something -- though it may seem trivial -- that was different?
Last evening, Archuleta was allowed to wear an earpiece. I had read that prior to that the producers (at some point if not the beginning) asked he not wear one because it didn't look good. For other contestants, yes, like Cook, that gave them an added advantage. It was more an even playing field last night. So the handicap removed, the listener heard Archuleta unincumbered. Thanks for the article.
Posted by: Charles | May 21, 2008 at 04:35 AM
Beautifully written. Your paridigm of gifted learner versus gifted doer is firm basis in judging the finals last evening. All along David Archueleta has been the more powerful of the two. Many factors contributed to Archuleta's success last night, but were you aware of something -- though it may seem trivial -- that was different?
Last evening, Archuleta was allowed to wear an earpiece. I had read that prior to that the producers (at some point if not the beginning) asked he not wear one because it didn't look good. For other contestants, yes, like Cook, that gave them an added advantage. It was more an even playing field last night. So the handicap removed, the listener heard Archuleta unincumbered. Thanks for the article.
Posted by: Charles | May 21, 2008 at 04:41 AM
Archuleta does have a good voice but he totally played it safe and did the same boring stuff he always does. David Cook took some chances and, while the second song did seem a bit of a bad choice, he performed flawlessly on all three songs. He deserves to win this contest. Archuleta has absolutely no versatility. Even falling back on "Imagine" for the final number. That felt a bit of a cheat to me. I agree with Cook in not wanting to go back and do something we'd already heard before. Archuleta sounds the same in every song. So, if people want completely predictable and sugary ballads then by all means, give the kid the trophy but if you want someone who could truly be a pop/rock idol then it's got to go to Cook.
Posted by: eric | May 21, 2008 at 04:51 AM
I thought David Archuleta was awesome on Tuesday evening! I love the clear tones of his voice, I can't wait to buy his CD. Good Luck to Archie!!
Posted by: Patty Hickey | May 21, 2008 at 04:57 AM
David A should WIN! He came out fighting last night and scored a knockout. This young man is so talented and so nice to listen to.
Posted by: Robin Delaney, Las Vegas NV | May 21, 2008 at 07:11 AM
IMHO, David Cook knew he couldn't beat the tween avalanche that will propell TCO to AI history and he decided to , instead of pandering to the kiddies, use this night to launch the David Cook Brand. I think it was a very smart move for the future of his career. I think he's too mature for the AI mantel. He looked so embarrased in the last couple of weeks doing "steps" with the other contestants.
Posted by: Sue | May 21, 2008 at 07:49 AM
Ok, first. I don't know anyone older than 13 that will buy David A's record. Secondly. I don't want David Cook to win if it means getting saddled to a cheezy pop, american idol recording contract. If he doesn't win, he can go with someone else who will better understand what to do with his talent. And David A....should be doing voices for Disney. He should be doing state fairs in Kansas or something.
Posted by: Smash | May 21, 2008 at 08:22 AM
Remember that American Idol is a Reality Show and David Cook will win. So many people say David A is going to win but wait and see . Watch to see the upset . That's your American Idol
Posted by: Berrie | May 21, 2008 at 08:43 AM
Arguably the best AI article written all season...go David Cook! Although I think Archie has it...no matter they both have record deals the difference is I would buy Mr. Cook's CD!
Posted by: Jay P | May 21, 2008 at 08:49 AM
David A. is cute but can only do one thing, David C. is the real thing & very versital. David C. is the top performer.
Posted by: kathy foster | May 21, 2008 at 08:55 AM
just as an aside, "Cincinatti" is actually spelled Cincinnati...
Posted by: Emily | May 21, 2008 at 08:59 AM
Sue I think you are dead on.
I think that coming in second might be the best thing for David Cook's career. And I am sure everyone associated with the show believes they can make more money with David A.'s "style".
Posted by: Laura | May 21, 2008 at 09:02 AM
Well, I'll admit I was blown away by David A's performance and decided to vote for him, although Cook had me convinced for a long time. I thought if he had one lackluster performance, what will happen on the long haul. He has a career in the making anyway, regardless of the American Idol brand, he has his own brand, just like Ann said.
Please tell me one thing though. My friend also called the right number for David A and the recording said :"Thank you for voting for contestant number ONE! He clearly called the right number for David A...he simply used redial for the same "04" number and the recording said "Thank you for voting for contestant number TWO!" He redialed again and it said "ONE"
WHAT'S UP? Can somebody tell me? If he hadn't used redial, he would have never known. Something's messed up somewhere.
Posted by: Kathy | May 21, 2008 at 09:03 AM
I too like the learner vs doer labels. In fact, I would extend the labels a bit.
Cook is forward looking; he's an artist in the sense that he is eager to create something new, to provide the listener with an experience never before known.
Archuleta has the more impressive skills, but lacks that forward-looking perspective. He's content to be nostalgic. He wants to move the lister every bit as much as Cook, but it's an indiscriminate desire. He's not concerned with the need to create something new. Just moving the listener is enough for Archuleta.
Cook wants to change the listener.
For me, that's the big distinction between the two Davids.
Posted by: Dave Stevens | May 21, 2008 at 09:15 AM
I also will not likely buy David A's music but will definitely buy David Cook's. It is about personal preference and while David A may be the "Idol" by the show's standards and the block of actual voters it appeals to, I anticipate David Cook's career to be a very, very successful one. Congratulations to both of them for shining in the moment and staying true to themselves no matter what the machine may be asking of them. There were two winners as far as I am concerned.
Posted by: DC | May 21, 2008 at 09:23 AM
Who is going to buy David A's albums? The same folks who buy Clay's? In the end the kid has a better voice and if he takes acting lessons he can make something of himself. But for making money as a recording artist, it is David C.
If I were producing my money would be on him.
Posted by: Steve | May 21, 2008 at 09:23 AM
Archuleta did not play it safe. Why would he want to sing a new song and have to learn three? He took the pressure off of himself. Anyway, that is what most of the former Idols have done. It would be a little silly not to repeat his best performance of the season. . It all comes down to taste in music. I happen to think that we need more ballads. There are too many rockers out there. David Cook is a really good performer, but he doesn't move me with his music, as does David Archuleta when he is singing from his heart and soul.
Posted by: Vicky | May 21, 2008 at 09:26 AM
David Cook performed with such class, style and dignity...why pander for the votes...a true artist doesn't. David A. vocally is good but big deal, have anyone seen that Filipino 15 year old belting out a song that is circulating in youtube? David A style is boring...for his age - won't be interested with his CD.
Posted by: pups | May 21, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Thousands and thousands of people paid $10.00 each for a chance to enter the 2008 American Idol Songwriting Contest, And look what they got.......So how many will it take till someone calls this fraud? 1. Top 20 American Idol Songwriting Finalist (Andy Zulla) is an engineer on Clay Aiken, Kelly Clarkson, Diana DeGarmo CD's. 2. Top 20 American Idol Songwriting Finalist (Windy Wagner) is a backup singer on the NEW Clay Aiken CD. 3. Top 20 American Idol Songwriting Finalist (Ryan Gillmor) wrote the theme song for the Fox television show "Unhitched". 4. Top 20 American Idol Songwriting Finalist (Dan Yessian) wrote jingles for Ford Motors. 5. Top 20 American Idol Songwriting Finalist (Luke Ebbin) is a producer on Austalian Idol 1st place runner-up Shannon Noll's CD. 6. Top 20 American Idol Songwriting Finalist (Regie Hamm) (FYI...USAToday.com has named him the Songwriting Winner), is a co-writer on the NEW Clay Aiken CD and he's also a co-writer of the winner of 2007's American Idol Songwriting Contest Scott Krippayne......Anybody see a pattern Yet? 3 of the 2008 American Idol Songwriting Contest Top 20 songwriters get credit on Clay Aiken CD's. Out of thousands and thousands of entries, 3 out of 20 work with Mr. Aiken. and nobody has a problem with this? The 2008 American Idol songwriting winner and 2007 American Idol songwriting winner are song co-writing partners and that's fine with everybody? If not then please visit ....... http://americanidolexposed.weebly.com .......for all the facts.
Posted by: Simon Says | May 21, 2008 at 09:34 AM
Well the one thing to look at is that Simon Cowell has predicted the outcome of the voting every time this season with the exception of the Michael Jons upset. And last night I do have to agree with this article Archuleta did win for sure, and I think that David Cook should have finished up with "Elanor Rigby" or his rendition of "You'll Always Be My Baby" which is AWESOME. Either way no matter who wins they are both off to be super stars and they BOTH deserve crowns.
Posted by: Kenny | May 21, 2008 at 10:01 AM
Hopefully, all of last night's praise for Archuletta won't create a backlash and have Cook win by default.
Posted by: Kim | May 21, 2008 at 10:04 AM
A true star is some one who takes a song and makes it their own, who changes it and makes it different, takes a risk and that is what David Cook did last night and has done all season. In my opinion he is the American Idol. What song so far has David A changed and made his own. His Elton John song sounded like an Elton John copy cat and his other two choices were boring and sounded like all the songs he sang all season. If America could not see the true talent here, then why have American Idol in the first place I say David Cook Rules and I am an adult, with kids of my own.
Posted by: Trish | May 21, 2008 at 10:11 AM
I loved your article. Even a Cook fan as you seem to sound, understood what David Archuleta accomplished last night. He even made you a believer, as I have been from the beginning. David A is more than just a beautiful voice, he should be the voice of old wholesome values. Music is one place where everyone can "voice" their own opinion, but there are some fans out there that need David A right now. Please let David Archuleta be tonight's American Idol and always.
Posted by: Lydia Gomez | May 21, 2008 at 10:14 AM
I totally agree with eric. I really do like DA, and he has a wonderful voice, and he is just adorable, but where is the versatiliy??? I wanted to hear him sing an upbeat song, other than the same old ballads. What I heard Dave A sing on Tuesday was what I have heard him sing since the beginning of AI season. I hate to say this, but I am a bit bored. DC on the other hand is extremetly versatile, has great stage presence, and is very charismatic. He always had me on the edge of my seat wondering how he is going to pull this song off. DA will win AI, guaranteed, but DC will make the millions, and will truly be a America's Superstar.
Posted by: Myra | May 21, 2008 at 10:21 AM
I voted for David Cook every week - numerous times when he changed his "look". He's quite handsome now. But I was very disappointed in David C last night - he should have done the "rest " of Baba O'Riley or another wonderful change-up cover in the Billie Jean genre... Whatever happens, though, they both will have a career. David C's will be bigger. Good luck to them both.
Posted by: Pam | May 21, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Artist = someone capable of creating something orriginal
American Idol = fans who can text 500 times in two hours = girls under 13
There's no doubt about it and .it's not a secret that Archie has a better voice than Cook...but...Cook will be famous and make original music that will sell well because people will actually want to hear it. Archie will be famous because a producer and manager will spend 100 million a year advertizing his album and forcing him to go on public tours and interviews. Archie is too imature for this business...who wants to go see im perform just to spend the whole time crying? HE'S TOO YOUNG....he should have waited 3 years to do this show....The kid doesn't even know what he wants, he just does what everyone tells him to do. He is nice, i'll give him that....but that doesn't sell albums or make you a great musician/artist. Would you want to hear someone original, or do you want to keep hearing a young kid do the same old ballads that have been done over and over again?
I can't believe the judges wanted Archie to win, time and time again the judges have always brutalized contestents who were old ballad singers and unoriginal....I found it all a little odd?
Posted by: yjeep93 | May 21, 2008 at 10:37 AM
The AI producers have the right to "saddle" any of the finalists they want with a "cheezy pop" recording contract, so losing doesn't help them. That said, I watched last night, excited about the fact that I, unlike the tweeners, could stay up until 1 AM and vote for David Cook multiple times. He's been my favorite contestant ever and I really can't stand David A. But I couldn't do it. David A blew David C away. Cook looked and sounded tired and how do you compete against "Imagine" with Collective Soul? Go ahead and give David A. the AI crown -- David C. is going to get the career and that's a much better prize.
Posted by: Last Time | May 21, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Just because David A. had a good night, does not mean that he will win the title. David Cook has done better on a weekly basis, and has a strong fan base. In season 2, Clay Aiken did amazing in the final show, yet Ruben got the title at the finale. I think David Cook will be the winner tonight. He is the more all around talented performer. David Arch sings nice ballads, but Clay Aiken already has that market cornered, and he is a much better vocalist than David Arch. (listen to Clay's version of Don't Let The Sun Go Down On Me) And with Michael Buble out there also and Josh Groban, the ballad market is pretty well covered. Plus these guys are all ENTERTAINERS also, whick David Arch is not. I think David Cook has got the win.
Posted by: Dee | May 21, 2008 at 10:55 AM
'Cute' David Archuleta will win AI because of the popular tween vote.
Smart, classy, talented David Cook will be the album I want to buy.
Posted by: CatGirl | May 21, 2008 at 10:56 AM
David A. should win, if not only for the reason that he needs the guidance of the team he will get. David Cook is going to have a career no matter what the outcome tonight...
Posted by: Bill | May 21, 2008 at 11:07 AM
I think the only reason David A. is still on the show is because a million little girls think he's cute. Yes, he can sing, but he can't sing things people wanna listen to. David Cook on the other hand, has talent. He can sing anything, and personally I think David Cook is extremely cuter than David A. Plus people will buy David Cook's albums.
Posted by: Akex | May 21, 2008 at 11:07 AM
I'll agree that Archie won the night and will win the title. Great, then what? Cook was and is a true musician and is definitely in the real world. Glad he was able to explain his last song choice. Can't say I agreed with it, however I am a fan of his and for that I support his decision. He has vision and will have longevity. That's maturity and wisdom at work. AI was Cook's platform and he made the decision last night to start to move away from it. Archuleta is very gifted, but if he actually faints or vomits onstage tonight, I won't be surprised. That is itself was quite an act! Good God get that boy an acting coach!
Posted by: Amy | May 21, 2008 at 11:15 AM
I like the edge in David C.'s voice, but I don't care for his somewhat arrogant demeanor. And I don't think he would like being saddled with an AI contract. On the other hand, if David A. wins, I'm worried about the effect on him of so much attention hitting one so young all at once. I'd hate to see him go down the path that some young celebrities have taken.
David A.'s "Imagine" was PERFECTION!!!!
Posted by: Carol Cherman | May 21, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Won't this show just DIE already?
UGH!
Posted by: Omar | May 21, 2008 at 12:32 PM
DC IS GOING TO WIN.. and if he doesn't i will still love him and buy his album
Posted by: Sarah | May 21, 2008 at 02:33 PM
Ann - sounds like you have well and truly drunk the AI kool-aid. Last night was such a scripted sand-bagging of DC it was ridiculous. Don't at all agree that DA was the best, though Simon & Co's opinions/sucker punch is widely trumpeted throughout the media as gospel. The judges were so obviously manipulative, as they have been all season, that it dishonored both contestants, who have worked hard to get to the Final Two, and deserved to be treated as more than a punchline in a scripted reality show.
Posted by: ann | May 21, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Overall you are pretty fair to both Davids, but I detect a slight sneer towards David C, a subtext that he thinks he's cooler than he is and is already presuming that he'll have a great career. I don't see any evidence of that in his demeanor. And what relevance does a tabloid rumor on his dating any "starlets" have to his performance on "Idol," pray?
While I do think David A brought it last night and projected that he wanted the title more than David C did, I don't think that made him the better artist, then or ever. David C dialed back, but he didn't phone it in...he put his soul in that last song, which for me was the best performance of the night, if not the season.
Here's hoping Cook has as successful a career as you suggest he (imagines he) will.
Posted by: ymmv | May 21, 2008 at 04:02 PM
I'm sick and tired of hearing about how David A did such a great job with Imagine. Poor John Lennon would be turning in his grave if he knew how his song was crucified by important lyrics being omitted. That song is very idealistic, very anti-war, and yes, very anti-religion.
I realize songs must be condensed on AI, but the important words in that song, "....and no religion too" should be sung to capture its true essence! And how about, "No hell below us, above us only sky"?
Of course, that wouldn't make for good politics, now would it?
Posted by: Imagine (there's no heaven) | May 21, 2008 at 04:08 PM
davidA will not win sorry!haha
Posted by: mckenzie | May 21, 2008 at 05:22 PM
If we are talking about talent, DA has the most natural kind - God given gift. I do not understand why people even like DC, as I have point out before he has no low register which Clive Davis also said last night. I am not surprised if DC wins just as I wasn't last season because Jordan Sparks also does not have a low register. There is nothing wrong that up tempo is not DA's game. Look at Josh Groban. DC may have a short forgettable career, DA will grow to a long career. The first time I heard DA, I like him a lot, please do not discriminate for his age, America, please do the right thing! Afterall since Michael Johns left, no one else deserves more to win other than DA.
Posted by: Kimbo | May 21, 2008 at 07:19 PM
would someone please explain what is already posted on wikipedia - American Idol- ?
Posted by: shellyb | May 21, 2008 at 07:43 PM
Steve,
Why use this forum to put down Clay Aiken?
He has sold over 7,000,000 units combined full albums and singles in the past five years and without radio play, not too shabby if you ask me.
And his fan base ranges from teens to grandmothers, as compared to David A who has a wrap on the tweens.
Clay Aiken is also the top selling AI artist when to comes to concert ticket sales grossing over $30,000,000 in ticket sales over the past five years with eight + successful tours with many venues completely sold out!
Let's see either of the " Davids" top that those concert ticket sales!
No need to put down Aiken, he has done very well (not to forget his recent successful Spamalot run with rave reviews from the critics) and is laughing all the way to the bank!
Both "Davids" could only hope to do as well in the next five years.
Posted by: psbintl | May 23, 2008 at 03:41 AM
Steve, why the swipe at Clay Aiken?
This is an artist who has an outstanding voice, he literally can sing circles around anyone in the industry today and any male who has since graced the American Idol stage.
He has sold over 7,000,000 units combined full albums and singles, has had eight (possibly nine) successful solo tours over the past five years (with many venues sold out) and all of this without the support of radio play.
He also just completed starring in Spamalot to the rave of numerous critics!
Not too shabby if you ask me. Clay Aiken is probably laughing all the way to the bank. The two "Davids" could only hope to do as well over the next five years!
Posted by: psbintl | May 23, 2008 at 09:03 AM
It's ashame that I've lived this long, because I think that I've seen too much. I hate to break it to you people who are young and stupid enough to think that women can be crooners, a misstatement that's been made quite often recently, David Archuta's music is old hat and somewhat boring. Alas, I've seen his act many times before and performed by singers with far better voices than his (try Il Divo for example).
David Cook, on the other hand, contrary to what that idiot Cowell believes, has a better voice for show tunes than anything else. As far as his "grittier side" is concerned, I've listened to his pre-Idol rock music and it's only competition would be from tomcats serenading in an alleyway. Unless he collaborates with top flight arrangers (I'd stay away from Randy Jackson if were him), he'll prove to the world that he's definitely not going to be the second coming of Chris Daughtry, who is an excellent songwriter and arranger by the way.
Nonetheless, Cook has a magnificent pop, semi-operatic voice and he's handsome enough, minus the extra weight, to succeed after winning the AI title, which is enough to guarantee at least a year's worth of success because of the curiosity factor. After that, it will depend on his savvy and ability to match his collaborators with what he does best.
Posted by: Ryunkin | May 26, 2008 at 06:58 PM
This is interesting and an engaging blog/journalism...well presented with objectivity.
I only wish AI viewers only knew that DA wanted to do songs that were not ballads. The producers were less than willing to get songs cleared and DA had to pick other songs...including Imagine for the finale. Possibly another case of favoritism & pimping (DC got a first ever approved U2 song on AI).
Posted by: Me2 | May 26, 2008 at 08:41 PM