Cosmetic surgery freaks out L.A. Times readers too, critic finds
When I wrote the article that ran in Sunday's Calendar section ("On TV: Botox. Face-lifts. Reconstructive Surgery.") about how cosmetic surgery and other procedures are conspiring to make more and more actors look weird, I was more than a little nervous. That people would think I was crazy or mean or petty in my complaints that it's hard to focus on a television show when you're wondering whether this actor or that actor was in some terrible fire you didn't hear about.
As it turns out, I am far from alone. E-mails have been pouring in from frustrated television viewers grateful for the chance to talk about this "elephant in the living room." Listing men and women, actors after actor, newscaster after newscaster as offenders, many viewers say they are so disgusted or demoralized, or both, that they have stopped watching some of their favorite shows.
The television industry shouldn't just dismiss this as minor kvetching. Because the people who have been writing to me say they also consider the apparent assumption that the audience is either too dumb to notice or too jaded to care to be insulting and part of a widening gap between those who make television and those who watch it.
In other words, the issue is far from cosmetic any more, and should, perhaps, give entertainers pause. Just because you can make your nose smaller or your cheeks fuller or your eyes tighter doesn't necessarily mean that you should.
For my part, I am grateful for the reassurance we writer types so desperately need. It's nice to know that I'm not crazy, not just an envious, querulous, aging mother of three who would probably go ahead and have lipo except I'm pretty sure they don't make lipo machines big enough. Some of these people really do look weird. And not just to me.
(For those who argued that one of the women I listed as looking very much like herself after years in the biz has, in fact, been public about her cosmetic surgery -- and you know who you are -- please let me know where she has been public. Not just evidence from sketchy blogs. Because I couldn't find it, and if it's true, we definitely need to get the name of her very excellent surgeon out there. Fast.)
-- Mary McNamara



I think the shows, movies and media should humiliate and lable these cosmetic surgery freaks to encourge that you have problems if you change your apperence. They should point out that those people are fake. All the shows are doing is encourging comsmetic surgery buy not pointing it out to the public.
Posted by: Frank | April 14, 2008 at 03:55 PM
I'm not kidding when I saw the photo the Times ran of Priscilla Presley gave me nightmares. I still can't get over how much that photo made her look like Rocky Dennis from "Mask."
Posted by: todd | April 14, 2008 at 05:44 PM
They looks like creatures, don't they? Yech. I'm so glad to be able to age peacefully. Besides, all my wrinkles all have fabulous memories associated with them, from my windsurfing days, magical times studying whales in Baja, long rides on my Thoroughbred mare, great bike rides down the Central Coast, you-name-it! Wrinkles rule!
Posted by: Pinkbike | April 14, 2008 at 06:40 PM
I certainly hope the person you were referring to is NOT Joan Rivers.
My gawd, she looks like Madame the Puppet.
Posted by: Native Angeleno | April 14, 2008 at 06:58 PM
This kind of article is WAY overdue. It is horrifying how awful some of these women look-and a truly frightening statement in so many ways about our society too. Aging is not always easy or graceful for any of us, but to mutilate yourself in the quest to look younger (which almost never works-and is clearly obvious to all ) is self-hate that is sad to see. And I agree that i can no longer look at Priscilla Presley or Jessica Lange (another debacle) without cringing...
Posted by: amc | April 14, 2008 at 07:30 PM
Didn't LA Times just run an article about how there is a slow down in the whole cosmetic surgery because of the economy? They showed a picture of a woman who was getting botox and lip plumping every 6 weeks for $1800. She did not look good! How can people think that this stuff looks attractive? YUK!
Posted by: Daisy | April 14, 2008 at 07:57 PM
Overdone plastic surgery doesn't make people look younger, it just changes the face of age.
http://strictlyanecdotal.com/2008/04/09/forty--the-new-sixty.aspx
Posted by: LCSusan | April 14, 2008 at 08:14 PM
Wow,
It is scary getting old in TV land
Posted by: Patrick nolan | April 14, 2008 at 08:47 PM
When I saw that picture of Priscilla Presley, I honestly had NO IDEA who--or what--it was. Oh...my...goodness...WHAT has she done to her face?! She used to be a pretty woman and now she's unrecognizable. Other celebrities, such as Cher, have had so much "work" done they're barely recognizable as themselves, but some--like Presley--have ended up looking not even human. What's wrong with these people? Why can't they be happy with what they already had?
Posted by: Grace | April 14, 2008 at 09:55 PM
As a twenty-something working actress in LA, the offenders mentioned in Sunday's article serve as a reminder to stick to the basics everytime I feel like slacking: don't smoke, don't sleep in makeup, take vitamins, drink plenty of water, wear sunblock daily, wear a hat at the beach.
Posted by: Pittsburgh Girl | April 14, 2008 at 11:23 PM
In your article on Sunday you hoped that Felicity Huffman didn't get so desparate as to take the cosmetic plunge. But it looked to me on Sunday night that she probably had some
Botox. If she just keeps with that, she looked ok. The problem is so many of these women don't know when to stop. Following Desparate Housewives I saw Eli Stone for the first time. Katey Sagal was almost unrecognizable... almost like Lara Flynn Boyle, who comes in a close second to Priscilla Presley.
Posted by: Lori | April 15, 2008 at 03:37 AM
Plastic surgery has been going on for decades. The Other story here is the incompetent plastic surgeons. Where is this surgery being done? Your story is not complete.
Posted by: KWRo | April 15, 2008 at 06:26 AM
This may be a minor point, but Audrey Hepburn had nothing done. Nothing. And she was always extraordinary looking.
This should be reason enough for all of us...
Posted by: NYC Gal | April 15, 2008 at 11:09 AM
I'm so glad to read an article in a major publication that addresses this issue. "Gasp! Eeee gaaad! What the heck did you do to your face?" I don't think this is quite the reaction hoped for by these actresses (and actors). And how exactly are you supposed to convincingly display emotion if your face doesn't move? Honestly watching TV and movies these days is often like watching stepford wives parade on screen. Younger actors and actresses will supplant you for sure if you keep the cosmetic procedures up because at least their faces have movement and feeling. How sad that these folks feel the need to turn themselves into alien like creatures instead of aging gracefully. It's inevitable that we will all get older and lose our youthful appearances. Lots of water, plenty of rest, healthy food, enough exercise, NO CIGARETTES OR DRUGS, moderate alcohol consumption (if you partake) and sun screen sun screen sun screen. That's all anyone can do, the rest is up to genetics. Please ladies (and gents), stop doing this to yourselves!
Posted by: Natalie | April 15, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Thank you Mary McNamara! I've actually started watching more BBC-America than network or U.S. cable shows because the faces actually move. Who'd a thunk? Actors whose elastic faces can express emotions and whose eyes and faces look surprised only when called for. It's almost worth the jarring commercial interruptions.
So many stars take the nipping, tucking, and bo-toxing too far suffering disfiguring consequences. They look "off" or wrong or simply scary. My kids were channel surfing, stopping at the Dance Show and asked me repeatedly, "What's wrong with that woman's face?"
Do they not see it? I guess if you're surrounded by others whose eybrows are now part of their hairline, it seems normal. But to a viewer it's offputting to say the least.
Posted by: No Tucking | April 15, 2008 at 01:04 PM
People who complain about what others choose to do with/to their own bodies should get a life of their own.
If someone wants to get cosmetic surgery it's their business and none of mine. Really!
Posted by: wwashing | April 15, 2008 at 07:44 PM
It's the emergence of a plastic surgery aesthetic, and it's terrible. All these women who have the same procedures all wind up looking alike in the same way that all children with downs syndrome share the same basic, and immediately recognizable, facial features.
Just look at Peppa of Salt 'n Peppa fame. She looks more like an alien diva from outer space than a soulful sista from the 'hood now.
Oh, and Mickey Rourke. Oh. My. God. What the hell was that idiot thinking? That the look of his role as Marv was a good plan for real life? Burt Reynolds? He looks like a fish in a hair piece. Nicole Kidman is the alien queen with an immobile forehead to match.
Remember those Duracell commercials a few years back in which all the actors had layers of semi-rigid plastic layered on themselves to appear as life-sized action figures? Fake and plasticy and gross? That's where we're headed, people.
Posted by: Spork | April 16, 2008 at 03:53 AM
It is sad to see people change for the worse. How do we tell this to our next generation before they get boob jobs at 16, 17, 18 yrs??? What about the body art?(tatoos) When will some stop? do they know what it will look like in 20 yrs? Start showing more before and after pictures, that might work.
javier
Posted by: javier | April 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM
It's true that anyone should be able to do whatever they want to their own bodies. I don't think the article is telling people they SHOULDN'T do it, but rather saying, for one, that it should be okay to talk about it. If someone has their nose replaced with a elephant's nose, should we all pretend that the new nose isn't there?
Another point is this: if a baseball player chooses to have his leg amputated, sports writers will 1) talk about it and 2) talk about his declining statistics in his chosen field. A novelist will probably still function well as a novelist with only one leg, but a baseball player will probably have to retire. One of the most important tools in an actor's arsenal is their face/facial expressions. If that face becomes grotesque because of plastic surgery, or immobile because of botox, etc., perhaps it is time for that actor to retire. Perhaps it is time for those who write about acting should talk about the actor's declining skills.
Another point is this: even if a person takes impeccable care of themselves, eats well and exercises, never gets any kind of "work" done, they are STILL GOING TO GET OLD AND DIE. Audrey Hepburn and a very few others can remain radiant and lovely deep into their golden years, but a good piece of the reason for that is DNA.
There are many more points to be made about this, but I'll stop here.
Posted by: mike | April 16, 2008 at 12:36 PM
All the plastic surgery is driving me away from certain shows. Seeing that someone butchered their face. 90% of acting is using your face and if it's all stretched and shiny or weirdly frozen you can't do your job. I wish they would stop casting these people and put it in their contracts they can't radically chage their appearance.
Posted by: erin | April 17, 2008 at 03:36 PM