Readers' Representative Journal

A conversation on newsroom
ethics and standards

« Previous Post | Readers' Representative Journal Home | Next Post »

Washington and his presidenc(ies)

April 21, 2008 |  9:43 am

Dozens of readers have taken issue with this line in a review of HBO's "John Adams" that appeared Saturday in Calendar:

George Washington ... so quickly tired of the infighting among his Cabinet and vagaries of public opinion that he stepped down from the presidency after a single term.

He served two terms, readers pointed out.

A correction is due to be published in the print edition tomorrow (one should be appearing on the online story today). The writer, Mary McNamara, responds to readers on Show Tracker. (Her mea culpa is also pasted in below.)

A TV critic's walk of shame
08:55 AM PT, Apr 21 2008
If you want to know if anyone is reading your stories, make sure you insert a mistake about George Washington.

Oh, if only I could claim it was all a ploy by Calendar editors to gauge readership. But when I wrote in Saturday's story about HBO that George Washington stepped down from the presidency after serving only one term, it was just a stupid, blind error, the sort that leaves you smiting your forehead, literally and repeatedly, the moment it is pointed out to you.   

For the six or seven people living in the Los Angeles Basin who did not e-mail to correct me, he served two terms, not one. And my daddy was a history teacher! Ever since the first e-mail hit my box (on Friday afternoon, about two seconds after the story went up on the website), I have been bathed in hot shame. But I want to thank you, well, most of you, for the gentle tone you took -- most clever subject line award goes to: Is a TV Critic Smarter Than a 5th Grader? -- though I certainly deserved all those incredulous exclamation marks as well. And yes, I did go to college. Graduated even.

Also, for the record, we entertainment writers are held just as accountable for flubbed historical references as any other journalist. The correction runs today online and in tomorrow's print edition, and I will try to comfort myself with the knowledge that a good, strong dose of humility is always good for the soul. Especially the soul of a critic.

-- Mary McNamara


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Ouch! But you are not alone, Mary. Many years ago, when I was a copy editor at the Syracuse (N.Y.) Post-Standard, I stupidly transposed the names of burglar and victim when rewriting a police brief about a break-in. Unfortunately, the victim was a prominent judge with no sense of humor. I'm cringing even now! -- Mark Fisher, Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch

Way to take your lumps, but there must be at least a couple of editors who should have had your back. They should also step up and take their lumps.



Advertisement

Readers' Rep Office
This forum is for questions, answers and commentary from L.A. Times readers and staffers about The Times' news coverage.

The goals: to help readers understand the thinking behind what appears in The Times; and to provide insight for the newsroom into how readers respond to their reporting.

About the Bloggers




Recent Posts
Times updates social media guidelines |  November 19, 2009, 1:48 pm »
Steven Zeitchik: reporter -- Entertainment |  November 17, 2009, 10:12 am »
(Even) more Qs & A's on the revamped latimes.com  |  August 19, 2009, 2:22 pm »

Archives