« How It Works (Or Doesn't) | Main | Can I Sell You a Subscription? »

Don't Believe It

In case there was any confusion (thanks Kos, Atrios and Drum) about an earlier post, the Public Policy Institute of California presented a very pessimistic view of the state's voters. The first line of my posting was nothing more than a play off the cliché: Good news for people who love bad news. This report is bad news about California. Enough said.

Read the whole posting and read the report.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00d834e6ed1069e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Don't Believe It:

Comments

It's sad that this thing got all the way to the front of those blogs; your intent/language was pretty clear. Just sayin': Sorry you got called a racist. Unfair.

I guess there should be no confusion about the racially tinged content in the rest of the column?

"Yay! The white minority will still be in power and subvert the interests of the dark skinned minority! Sehr Gut!"

Oy vey. Keep up the good work, Robert. The good news is, not one comment in Kos' thread supports his remark. I'd think that every major CA political blogger would be familiar with your solid record. Shrug.

I think it's very clear what you meant. I am not one to take charges of coded, subtle, or subconscious racism lightly, but what you said clearly was not racist or anything close to it.

Thanks for clearing that up!

Don't blame the bloggers. Your writing was at best ambiguous. And in an age when a senator freely and repeatedly calls an Indian American 'Macaca' in front of a video camer on the campaign trail, well, anything seems possible.

Someon'e's got Karl Rove on speedial and it ain't the angry leftist bloggers.

Bad news - your comment was ambiguous enough that people reading your comment who didn't follow your work would probably divide 50-50 on what it meant.
Good news - Pretty much everyone familiar with your daily writing thought your intent was clear and benign.

Ah, thank you for clarifying. I read your remarks and was convinced it was racist. But your explanation makes total sense. Don't blame anyone for being confused. It was a confusing sentence.

Rejoice!

Markos' diss means your post is getting read, and your (coded) message that Democrats need to get minorities to the polls is being heard. You're being discovered by people who hadn't heard of you and being added to their bookmarks.

I doubt it was intentional, but calling you a racist was probably a more effective way of driving traffic your way than saying something positive.

Congratulations. You've just become a minor darling of kossacks who noticed.

Post a comment

If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






Our Blogger

Robert Salladay
Robert Salladay has covered California governors and state politics for 10 years. He has worked for the Oakland Tribune, the San Francisco Examiner, and the Capitol bureaus of the S.F. Chronicle and L.A. Times. He is a graduate of UC Berkeley in history and Northwestern University in journalism. He covered the election of Gray Davis (twice), the 2000 Florida presidential recount, the 2003 recall and the Schwarzenegger administration. A native of Sacramento, he has lived in San Francisco, Oakland, Chicago, Washington, D.C., and Chesapeake, Va.