Outdoors, action, adventure

« Previous Post | Outposts Home | Next Post »

Wildfires are dramatic events for people and wild animals


A commenter named Jeff accused me of being overly dramatic after I posted an item Wednesday referring to this as the hellish season in Southern California after the Morris fire broke out.

Two days later, four wildfires are burning in Southern California and people are being encouraged to stay indoors because of smoke and sweltering temperatures.

There's plenty of drama to go around. Firefighters are experiencing it first-hand. So are people who live near the fires, some of them now staying in shelters. So are wild animals, some with nowhere to run.

In fact, the fire in the Rancho Palos Verdes area, now 35% contained, is charring not only hiking trails but game trails. It last burned four years ago and local resident Donna McLaughlin recalled hiking in its aftermath and discovering charred rabbits and snakes.

"This fire is a lot worse than the 2005 fire, so I am sure more wildlife has been affected," McLaughlin said after a Friday morning hike on the McBride Trail, which has not been touched by fire.

The fire, however, has burned part of a nature reserve in the Portguese Bend area. That area is one of only a few remaining areas where the California gnatcatcher is found.

Two years ago I interviewed Terri Stewart, a Department  of Fish and Game biologist, who said many small animals cannot outrun major wildfires and also succumb to smoke. But a surprising number of animals do survive by burrowing or holding over in small areas passed over by flames.

She added that raptors will swoop down and prey on these charred critters in a fire's aftermath. Or to use her words, they will "have a field day."

How's that for drama?

-- Pete Thomas

Photo: A helicopter drops water on the Rancho Palos Verdes fire. Credit: Alex Gallardo / Los Angeles Times

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Comments (2)

It breaks my heart when the FS allows lightning fires to burn for "resource benefits" - and a bigger shame when the fire is human caused. Not only do the small creatures die, the ones who avoid the smoke and flames have no food to get them through the winter. The forage takes a few years to grow back before its tall enough to be above the snow in the winter range for elk and deer. The bears don't find enough to eat, and come into towns and breaking into homes.

Thank you Pete Thomas for giving a little attention to the animals who are the most vulnerable in wildfires. I get a heartache thinking about what they must go through because an imbecile started a fire. And it's disgusting to me when reporters say "no structures/houses have been lost", as if that's all that really matters. What about all the hundreds of little beautiful creatures that got burnt to a crisp. What about the beautiful trees and plants that once graced our earth. Apparently, to this 'modern' human race, that is of no consequence. So when all of nature gets burnt down and all the animals become extinct, the loss of humanity will be of no consequence either...it will be a relief!


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

About the Bloggers
Outposts' primary contributor is Kelly Burgess.