Olympics Blog

News about the Summer and Winter Games

« Previous Post | Olympics Blog Home | Next Post »

Does DeScenza gain or lose by her world record? Suit yourself

Des1a

American Mary DeScenza is the latest (pick one) a) beneficiary or b) unwitting victim of the total incompetence that the leaders of the international swimming federation (FINA) have revealed in their handling of the high-tech swimsuit issue over the past two years.

DeScenza, of Naperville, Ill., whose elite swimming career had been excellent if unexceptional until Wednesday morning, suddenly did something that until last year would have been a great mark of distinction.

The sad thing is what should have been a career achievement for DeScenza -- setting a world record in the World Swimming Championships at Rome -- has become almost inconsequential because she did it in one of the soon-to-banned suits that have rendered world records meaningless.

When DeScenza lowered her personal best in the 200-meter butterfly by nearly three seconds with a time of 2 minutes, 4.14 seconds (four-one-hundredths better than the previous record), she made as clear a statement as anyone about the efficacy of these rubberized, polyurethane suits.

Rather than compete in equipment made by her sponsor, Tyr, whose latest high-tech model already has been banned, DeScenza chose to wear a suit made by the Italian company Jaked. She did her best to black out the Jaked name on the suit so as not to offend Tyr, which gave its contracted athletes the option of using other equipment if they felt disadvantaged by remaining loyal.

DeScenza's world record was among the 22 set in the first four days of the championships. The previous best was 16 at the 1973 worlds, when there were fewer events but the East German women were obliterating records with chemical rather than technological doping.

Phelps3a One new record came Wednesday from Michael Phelps, wearing one of the now-outdated Speedo LZR legging suits (which also will be banned sometime next year because they go below the knee), who crushed his own 200 butterfly record (1:52.03) with a time of 1:51.51.

Although some might say that gives credence to the notion that the suits aren't the sole recipe for all the records, I would point out these two things:

1.  Phelps is the greatest swimmer ever and utterly on a planet of his own in the 200 fly (as well as the individual medley events, which he is not swimming in Rome), yet even his ability was not enough to overcome Paul Biedermann's suit-enhanced swim in Tuesday's 200 freestyle.

2.  The Speedo LZR is where this technology began to run wild last year.  Fifty-one of the 55 long-course (50-meter pool) world records broken in 2008 came from swimmers wearing the LZR, which had polyurethane panels rather than the all-poly fabrics in the new Jaked01 and Arena X-Glide suits.

Since I noted in Tuesday's Blog that it seemed hypocritical for Germany's Biedermann to denounce the rules allowing him to use the X-Glide suit that he wore to beat Phelps, I have had several interesting e-mail exchanges with a reader upset at my characterization of Biedermann. She felt the LZR wearers crying foul (Phelps, for one, has pointedly chosen to take the high road and give Biedermann full credit) were the hypocrites since they had the advantage of better technology at the Beijing Olympics.

The big difference in the two situations is the changed attitude of the other manufacturers and national swimming federations toward use of whatever suit gives the best chance to win. That is the all-poly suits, which add flotation and streamline the body with their extreme compression.

Last year, Speedo brought 3,000 extra LZR suits to Beijing and made them available to anyone who wanted to use them. But federations did not want to deny their swimsuit sponsors the chance for Olympic exposure, which effectively left no choice for the swimmers from non-Speedo countries, which helped the Speedo-suited powers, the United States and Australia.

This year, in the chaos FINA unleashed by allowing anything without a motor, the countries and manufacturers decided medals meant more than contracts, especially since all this is expected to go back to square one when (if?)  the new rules approved this week requiring suits made of textiles go into effect sometime in 2010.

Lurking behind the fiasco is the nasty little secret that accelerated FINA's cave-in to technology, which was outlined clearly by the Sydney Morning Herald's Richard Hinds in a Wednesday story. As Hinds noted, televised swimming is little more than a lot of water splashed by athletes whose faces are almost completely invisible (save backstrokers) once they start racing.  But TV enlivened the picture several years ago with its own technology advance, the "world record line,'' which adds the interest of comparing the swimmer to the world-record pace.

What does that mean? The more world records, the better.

But now the sport has to deal with the unintended consequence of that attitude.

The backlash against the suits has forced FINA to go back to the future, and it seems likely that few of the records set in 2008 and 2009 by swimmers in Speedo, Jaked or Arena suits will be broken for years to come by swimmers in all-textile suits. Even Phelps, who set plenty of world records without the LZR, will be hard pressed to lower the times he has clocked with it.

FINA now can choose to return to the records as of Jan. 1, 2008, put asterisks next to any records set after that or simply leave the current records as they are. All those choices make FINA look stupid -- which is an accurate reflection of the only quality the international federation has displayed unequivocally regarding the swimsuit issue.

Which brings us back to DeScenza, for whom this world meet likely will be the high-water mark of a career in which she has twice fallen just short of making the Olympics. She finished second in a semifinal Wednesday and advanced to Thursday's 200 fly final with a time slightly slower (2:04.33) than her world record, which miraculously has stood for several hours.

"I didn't even think I was going that fast,'' DeScenza said of her record swim.

Who would, in a suit doing some of the work for them?

-- Philip Hersh

Photo, top: Mary DeScenza climbs across a lane line after setting a world record in a suit with maker's name blacked out to protect her sponsor, a different company. Credit: Mark Terrill / Associated Press

Photo, bottom: Michael Phelps, in his Speedo LZR leggings, before the start of his world-record swim in Wednesday's 200 butterfly final. Credit: Filippo Monteforte / Getty Images

 
Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments (4)

Let's remember that as good as Phelps is, he also took 6 months off after the Olympics and just started swimming again about 3 months ago. No matter how good a swimmer is, they can't expect to take that much time off and still compete at this level like before after only a few months back.

And it's not like he was doing the healthiest stuff during his time off. Playing poker and partying in Vegas and taking hits off bongs isn't exactly out of season conditioning.

So maybe the suit had some effect on Phelps losing. But it's probably more about Phelps sitting on his butt while Biedermann trained his off those 6 months.

The biggest joke is his coach Bob Bowman saying they'd boycott races until the high-tech suits are banned. That was after the 200 fr loss. Funny, but after Phelps won the 200 fly in a WR, not a word from Bowman about a boycott. Hmmmm.....

The whole controversy is more public at World/Olympic championships, but just as -- or maybe more -- disconcerting at lower levels. At NCAA conference championships around the country last winter the talk was all about who was swimming in what suit: not the swimmers, not the training, not the coaches. Records were obliterated. The swimmers obsess about which of several suits to wear. And because those below the international elite status -- who don't pay for their own suits anyway -- have to actually PAY for the suits, the decision is even more stressful. And swimmers who are closing out 15- or 18-years of competitive swimming get caught up in a buzz saw of technology and never get to reap the benefits of their dedication. And of course it is spreading -- rapidly -- to high school and age group championships, as one could obviously see at recent USA Swimming summer long course meets around the country. A pox on FINA's (and USA Swimming's and NCAA's) houses!

I feel that this time it is an outrage.
sure, last year the new speedo suits were a controversy too, but they were offered to anyone at the Olympics, if some couldn't take them then too bad.

I think fina needs to make a more unilateral approach, set a standard, of body compression and hydrodynamic resistance, and disallow all suits above this standard.
granted, Phelps my not be in Beijing shape, but it dosen't take a rocket scientist to see that something is wrong when a German who wasn't that good suddenly smashes Phelps and at the same time happens to be in a new "super suit"

To those complaining that Phelps was 'taking bong hits' as an example of how he 'wasn't taking care of himself': what you don't know about swim athletes & pot is comically naive.

Amazing how people think they 'know something' based on corporatized social policy propaganda, & prefer to believe that athletes live in a 'publicity-approved' bubble.
Athletes could clear up this confusion, if they were allowed to do so by sponsors.

======

On performance-altering, body modification equipment:

There was a time when athletes felt a measure of shame at wins created by unfair advantages.
There was a time when the Olympics were about sportsmanship.
Now its about bending the limits of ethical gameplay & corporate commodification.

"oh, but the suits were available to everybody!"

yeah, right. *Train for years* then make the performance & body-altering available at the last minute.
What could be wrong with that, right?

This is typical of a society which no longer feels waiving wealth & privilege in the faces of its neighbours is in bad taste & poor sportsmanship.

If you can't win because your feet aren't flexible enough for a sport... maybe a cash-carrying Sponsor should saw them off & provide engineered prosthetics?

To recall the quote of an East German trainer defending from the complaints about 'roid-masculinized female athletes: "They're not here to sing". Nobody liked that much... & biological doping became synonymous by its association with 'Communist Cheaters'.

When American athletes waive medals they didn't earn on a level **human** competitive playing field... at Olympics 'sponsored' by American companies that engage in hiring WHINSEC-trained terror squads for American off-shore human rights criminals...
(can you say: "sugar slavery, union busting & water-rights theft," Coca-Cola??)

don't you ever pause to wonder: what does the Rest of The World think of you?

Because there are billions of us, watching you.
Don't be shocked if we learn more than you're willing to admit.
What? we followed your 'win at all costs' example?
for shame.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...


About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives