Medals Per Capita geo quiz: Slovenia or Slovakia?
Most Americans just don’t think all that much about Slovenia and/or Slovakia, mostly because thinking about Slovenia and/or Slovakia would require knowing that Slovenia and/or Slovakia exist.
Of course, this reflects far more upon our national geography dimness than upon Slovenia and Slovakia, especially when you realize that while the populous United States dwells as a straggler deep down the Medals Per Capita standings, Slovenia and Slovakia are unadulterated, out-and-out Medals Per Capita mastodons.
Slovenia -- mighty, mountainous and pleasingly light of population -- has bolted from No. 7 to No. 2 in the standings after Friday’s mass perspiration in Beijing, while Slovakia -- mighty, mountainous and pleasingly light of population -- has soared from No. 11 to No. 4.
That may surprise some, but the Medals Per Capita think tank long has stood attuned to the MPC wonders of both Slovenia and Slovakia, having watched them frequent the top 10 at Athens 2004 until they rested at No. 5 (Slovenia, four medals) and No. 17 (Slovakia, six medals).
That forced Medals Per Capita to drill it into Medals Per Capita’s head that Slovenia used to belong to Yugoslavia and Slovakia used to belong to Czechoslovakia, the latter easier to guess upfront. They’re both in Europe which, for any Americans reading here, is a continent on the other side of the Atlantic from the United States.
The Atlantic is an ocean.
More after the jump....
Slovenia, sitting down south alongside Italy on the Adriatic (which is a sea), got a judo gold medal from Lucija Polavder to double its medal count to two, awesome from a population of but 2,007,711. As for Slovakia, up in Central Europe just below Poland, well, let’s just say you don’t want to go kayak- or canoe-racing with any Slovakians, lest you crave having your fanny whipped.
Three of Slovakia’s four medals come from that sport, from a country of just 5,244,749 oarspeople, a population cleverly low and yet enhanced further when Slovakia doubled down MPC -- strategically breaking from the Czech Republic on Jan. 1, 1993 in the “Velvet Divorce,” after which the two remain close friends, as the world should be.
And then, while MPC keeps keen affection and healthy fear of Slovenia and Slovakia, it’s getting downright agog over Armenia, a veritable Secretariat refusing to luxuriate in its lead.
For four days running, Armenia has led the supreme, vital, indispensable MPC standings, yet it has gone about improving its MPC rating: from one medal per every 1,484,293 Armenians on Tuesday, to 989,529 on Wednesday, to 742,147 on Thursday, and to a scalding 593,717 on Friday.
Ignoring stifling MPC pressure, Armenia has plucked a bronze per day lately, the latest from Tigran Varban Martirosyan in the men’s 77-85kg weightlifting, giving Armenia five golden bronzes, three in weightlifting and two in wrestling. How a man could lift both his country’s lead in the MPC standings and that barbell with all that stuff on the ends simply defies belief.
It has both a population of 2,968,586 and the whole world in a headlock.
It’s just plain Herculean.
In MPC minutiae, meanwhile:
-- Yes, an MPC rating can retreat, of course, in the event of a positive doping test. It’s luridly exciting. When Kim Jong Su lost both his silver and bronze medals in shooting after testing positive for a beta blocker, it sent North Korea careening from 16th place to 26th, its medals dropping from seven to five and its MPC bloating from 3,354,156 to 4,695,818. Medals Per Capita gets all giddy when a positive test rocks the standing, not least because it means somebody like American shooter Jason Turner slept a few nights in fourth place, then woke up one day in third, absolutely the most fashionable way to medal in this drug-addled 21st century.
-- Two more medals to make eight, and here comes Cuba.
--Traditional MPC darling Norway has proved a Winter Olympics MPC titan by dominating cross-country skiing, which showed Norwegian studliness because everybody knows that in most countries, if you want to go cross-country, you wimpily drive a car or take an airplane. Yet as Norway streamed from No. 25 to No. 11 in the Summer Games, well, who knew Norwegians could swim? Is this some testament to global warming?
The top 10 (with medals, and number of citizens per medal):
1. Armenia (5) - 593,717
2. Slovenia (2) - 1,003,856
3. Australia (20) - 1,030,043
4. Slovakia (4) - 1,311,187
5. Cuba (8) - 1,427,994
6. Mongolia (2) - 1,498,041
41. Poland (2) - 19,250,348
49. Ethiopia (1) - 78,254,090
Selected others:
11. Norway (2) - 2,377,902
20. Kazakhstan (5) - 3,068,107
29. Togo (1) - 5,858,673
7. Georgia (3) - 1,543,614
8. Switzerland (4) - 1,895,380
9. Hungary (5) - 1,986,183
10. Azerbaijan (4) - 2,044,429
New entries
31. Ukraine (7) - 6,563,470
32. United States (46) - 6,604,883
37. Japan (13) - 9,791,417
44. China (41) - 32,440,112
--Chuck Culpepper
Culpepper is a contributor to The Times.
Photo: Slovakian kayaker Elena Kaliska speeds along Beijing's slalom course on her way to an Olympic gold medal. Credit: Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times




please also count against the 7 mil Armos worldwide one brz for Sweden won by an Armenian (Abrahamian, who was cheated of gold), another brz by Ukraine (Vardanyan) and a gold for Ukraine in shooting (Aivazyan).
Enough with beach volleyball
Enough softball
Enough ribbon-gymnastics
Bring on the weighlifting, boxing, wrestling and field events.
Posted by: jd | August 15, 2008 at 03:56 PM
Moja Slovenija!!
Posted by: Janez Lomsek | August 15, 2008 at 08:12 PM
"North Korea careening from 16th place to 26th, its medals dropping from seven to five and its MPC bloating from 3,354,156 to 4,695,818."
Those numbers look like population per medal, not MPC.
Posted by: David | August 17, 2008 at 02:33 AM
Awesome post! I'm glad that someone has realized that medal competition of nations should not be about the medal count but about the ratio between medals won and population of nations.
Suggestions:
- David is right, the numbers are not MPC, but 1/MPC.
- It would be more correct to calculate WMPC or 1/WMPC. W is for weighted. Each medal should have a weight (Gold 3pts, Silver 2pts, Bronz 1pts).
Corrections: IMO it's more correct to say "Slovak kayaker" instead of "Slovakian kayaker". It's Slovak Republic after all and not Slovakian Republic.
Anyway, thanks for recognizing Slovakia to be in "Central Europe" and not incorrectly in Eastern Europe, as it is common.
Posted by: Igor Minar | August 17, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Slovenia has 4 olympics medals, so it should be on the 1. place.
Posted by: Toni | August 18, 2008 at 02:28 AM
Slovenia won yesterday another two medals, so we are leading now I think :)
We have now 4 medals
Slovenia (4) ~ 502,000
Cheers :)
Posted by: Ole | August 18, 2008 at 04:05 AM
This is a dumb metric. All a small country, such as Tuvalu (pop ~11,000), needs to do is recruit some great athlete to become a citizen and they'd always be #1.
Posted by: heeb | August 18, 2008 at 07:46 AM
"got a judo gold medal from Lucija Polavder"
Lucija Polavder got bronz, not gold...
but otherwise, I like the article.
I feel S(love)nia!
Posted by: just_me | August 18, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Are you kidding? This writer is being completely sarcastic! He thinks the MPC is irrelevant. I can't stand it. Why does he have to be the writer updating us on all the MPC news? Let these countries enjoy their accomplishments without being all smug about it. Sheesh.
Posted by: Margarita | August 18, 2008 at 07:26 PM
Slovenia has now 5 medals: 1 gold, 2 silver, 2 bronze
Posted by: pinkpanter | August 19, 2008 at 03:42 AM
Slovenia has now 5 medals the last was silver by vasilij žbogar - sailing.
So now slovenia has 406.136,2 medals per capita and the MPC data on the top at least for the Slovenia is incorrect, because data from the statistical bureau of slovenia shows us that the population of Slovenia is not 2.007.712 as in the article but it is 2.030.681 source: http://www.stat.si
Posted by: matejgaser | August 19, 2008 at 03:45 AM
I think the weighted rating suggested would be a good idea, and since the number of people per medal is not MPC but the inverse, what if the rating was dubbed "Medal per Million" showing the number of medals / million population, and a "WMPC" for weighted rating (3, 2 , 1 as suggested) with possibly some factoring to take group events (relays, rowing, team gymnastics) where multiple medals are given for one event, and treat them as one medal. Maybe give a score of 4 to Gold rather than 3 to weight a bit heavier for top honors.
Posted by: Sam Smith | August 25, 2008 at 06:58 AM