« Previous Post | Pop & Hiss Home | Next Post »

Tom Waits, Bon Jovi, Beastie Boys, LL Cool J top eclectic list of Rock and Roll Hall of Fame nominees

When the list arrived of this year's nominees for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, the first thing that occurred to me was a very current cliche. The roster -- eclectic, centerless, open to many interpretations -- seemed very much like an iPod playlist.

The nominees for induction in 2011 are Alice Cooper, the Beastie Boys, Bon Jovi, Chic, Neil Diamond, Donovan, Dr. John, the J. Geils Band, LL Cool J, Darlene Love, Laura Nyro, Donna Summer, Joe Tex, Tom Waits, and Chuck Willis.

HOF_2011Doesn't this unusually long and laudably diverse list seem like it could be on somebody's mix at the gym? Perhaps not a drag queen's, to steal a recent line from "Glee" -- but from one angle it does fulfill that stereotype, with disco favorites (and repeat nominees) Chic and Donna Summer sharing megabytes with glam rock's scary  uncle Alice Cooper, coffeehouse chanteuse Laura Nyro, and girl group heartbreaker Darlene Love.

Or maybe it's the Nano of a suburban mom or dad. I regularly meet several on the soccer field who will be delighted for Bon Jovi, one of the hardest-working bands in show biz and this year's populist choice. Like so many artists once scorned for being "too pop" -- like Neil Diamond, for example -- Bon Jovi has been recognized more recently for its consummate craft and dedication to the art of entertainment. One thing that's gone upside-down in the iPod age is the notion of what's hip. Loving "Cherry Cherry" and admitting you rock out in the car to "Livin' on a Prayer" are now signs of open-mindedness.

J. Geils Band, an underdog but a favorite of some rock hall insiders, is in some ways the Bon Jovi of an earlier generation -- a bar band gone nationwide. And a parallel can be drawn between Diamond and Donovan. Both songwriters were seen in their prime as mainstreamers of countercultural sounds and styles; now, both are reborn proteges of Rick Rubin, contemporary pop's prime conveyor of the stamp of authenticity, and are recognized as legitimate rock-era titans.

Hip from the beginning, the previously nominated Beastie Boys get another chance this year, and in some ways, the pioneering hip-hop punks stand alone; they're this year's purest representatives of the 1980s college-rock crowd. Put the Beasties and Jon Bon together on a playlist, though, and add in heartthrob rapper LL Cool J, and what do you have? A quintessential 21st-century wedding reception mix. None of these artists are that far apart.

Indie types could also claim first-time nominee Waits as their own, though he really transcends any subculture or simply defined category. The singer-songwriter and Anti Records artist will likely be lauded by several varieties of music snobs as this year's bravest choice. He's an art-rocking innovator who's never had a big hit; it's hard to imagine him schmoozing at this spring's VIP induction ceremony.

Yet Waits would easily fit on a playlist with Dr. John. The New Orleans stalwart connected roots music to psychedelic rock in ways similar to what the California contrarian, in his mid-period, did for it and post-punk.

As for the two lesser-known, roots music-associated names on this year's list, both make fitting predecessors to this era of delightfully mixed-up flash. Chuck Willis was a blues-rock dandy known for crossing over from R&B to pop. Joe Tex was a soul shouter and rival of James Brown whose distinctive vocal approach pre-dated rap.

I'd be happy for virtually any combination of this year's worthy and widely varied nominees. Apart from specifics, I'm glad that the rock hall, by definition devoted to hierarchies, has fully embraced the iPod approach to canonization. That little device and the culture of downloading that it embodies have thoroughly shuffled pop's hierarchies, making this an era of alternate realities, proudly personal value judgments and left-field notions of greatness. Yes, there will be complaints about this year's nominees, as always. But no one can argue that this mix is one that will make the fancy folks at this year's induction ceremony shake in their seats -- in the best possible way.

-- Ann Powers

Photo: Tom Waits poses for the Times in 1989. Credit: Ellen Jaskol / Los Angeles Times

Comments () | Archives (32)

the RnR Hall of Fame is like the grammies of the 60's and 70's. all polka, no substance.

I wouldn't be surprised if Starland Vocal Band and The Captain and Tenille got in before say, Jethro Tull, or Yes, or Joni Mitchell, or John Lennon as a solo act, or Emerson, Lake, and Palmer.

and since someone mentioned Styx, I'll toss Kansas in the conversation

Joe Tex? C'mon, Joe Tex was a blues guy. I'm from Boston originally, so sure I'd like to see J. Geils get in.

What REALLY sticks in my craw though is that Jethro Tull has never been inducted into the Hall of Fame, primarily because Jann Wenner has such a heavy hand in the nominations-and he doesn't like Tull at all.

Time to let the public have at least one vote on the nominations, if not the actual induction itself..........

Oh, I'd second Little Feat in a heartbeat any day as well. Far quicker than Bon Jovi. If Jon Bon Jovi gets in, I'd like to see him recognize his uncle Tony Bongiovi for once and for all. If it wasn't for Tony and all the production help and studio expense that Jon screwed him out of, Bon Jovi would never had seen the light of day.

Rush passed up again? Figures. As if Lebron leaving Cleveland didn't sting the city enough. The HOF has turned out to be a complete joke.

Kiss wears that cool make-up, but musically, it's mediocre at best.

Chicago should definately be in before most of these groups, Moby Grape deserves to be in the Hall, they are one of the best groups of all time. Moody Blues had a very unique style that was there own and should be in as well as Blue Cheer for inventing Heavy Metal. Probably left some groups out but ALL of the above deserve to be in right now!

I hope everyone who understands and loves the artform, and the spirit, of Rock and Roll realize that this RR Hall of Fame Institution is an insult to the Heart and Soul of Rock and Roll.

Whomever is making the reccomendations cares not one bit for the Art Form itself or the purveyors of the art form. If they did, they would only be including artists who have made their mark on the face of R and R and have had heavily influenced succedding generations of artists. There are thousands out there who should be thought of but unfortunately there is no money in it so they remain unnoticed/ignored.

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is concerned only with making headlines and nothing else becasue that is where the money is. No other motivation exists for this organization. This is why their criteria for nominations is one thing and one thing only, has the person or band being nomitated ever had a hit record.

I would like to see artists actually nominated or "winning" a spot turn down the so called award on the grounds their passion for the art form simply will not allow them to take part in such an obvious marketing scheme.
But, alas everyone has to eat, even disco and pop artists so that will never happen.

If we all ignore them, they will eventually disappear.

Not a single person has lauded HoF for nominating Tom Waits. An artist who has been producing amazing music for 30+ years, fits in no genre and has never had an album get higher than #28 on the US charts. He has been covered by numerous artists, written multiple musicals and he (and/or his music) has shown up in nearly 50 movies since 1978. And no one knows who he is. He deserves recognition for what he has accomplished.

Having a string of commercially successful albums does not prove that you are a noteworthy entertainer. Being an influence, being important to artists who come after you, that is something to be remembered and recognized.

« | 1 2


Recommended on Facebook

In Case You Missed It...


Recent Posts

Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: