'Saw,' the franchise that won't die (or will it?)
Pretty much every horror director you talk to these days proclaims the end of torture porn. And yet "Saw," the franchise that most exemplifies the modern movement, won't go away (the hand-from-the-grave jokes write themselves).
Lionsgate's post-Jigsaw horror flick "Saw 3D" opened this weekend and, despite competition from "Paranormal Activity 2" and potential franchise fatigue for what is a remarkable seventh movie in seven years, still managed to win the weekend with a respectable $24 million.
The victory over "Paranormal Activity 2" is especially notable because the first incarnation of that low-budget upstart defeated "Saw VI" soundly last year on Halloween weekend, enough of an embarrassment to prompt Lionsgate to bring on then-"Paranormal Activity 2" director Kevin Greutert to direct the new "Saw." (Greutert was set for "Paranormal," but Lionsgate had the option to use him for "Saw" -- which, perhaps fearful of losing more of its audience to "Paranormal," it then exercised in a move of corporate jujitsu.)
Of course, as my colleague Ben Fritz points out, even though the box-office numbers for the new "Saw" nearly doubled those of "Saw VI," the victory isn't as unqualified as you'd think. This weekend's figures were distorted by the new film's 3-D ticket surcharges, for one thing. And "Saw 3D" still came in below the opening numbers for the second, third, fourth and fifth "Saw" films (which all grossed in the $30-million to $34-million range). And "Paranormal Activity 2" will likely still beat "Saw 3D" by a wide margin when all is said and done.
There's another piece of box-office data that suggests the popularity of the franchise is slipping.







