24 Frames

Movies: Past, present and future

Category: Dr. Seuss' The Lorax

Box office: 'The Lorax' scores 2012's biggest opening [Video]

March 5, 2012 | 12:02 pm

The Lorax was the No 1 film at the box office this weekend
Box office ticket sales continued to soar this weekend, as "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax" had the biggest opening of the year so far with a gross of roughly $70 million.

The animated 3-D film far exceeded industry expectations, while the weekend's other new release, the low-budget "Project X," also got off to a solid start. The R-rated film about three teenagers throwing a debaucherous party collected a respectable sum of around $20 million.

Not surprisingly, each film appealed to a totally different demographic. Families were the target audience for "The Lorax," as 68% of the audience was made up of parents and their children. "Project X," meanwhile, appealed mostly to young males, as men constituted 58% of the overall crowd, and 67% were under age 25.

For more details on the box office results, check out this week's video report.

RELATED:

$70.7-million debut for 'Dr. Seuss' The Lorax'

'The Lorax' targeted for its green credentials

'The Devil Inside' is latest film to use 'found footage'

--Amy Kaufman

twitter.com/AmyKinLA

Photo: A scene from "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax." Credit: Universal Pictures


'Dr. Seuss' The Lorax:' Five lessons from its box-office success

March 5, 2012 |  7:21 am

Even for a season that has seen surprisingly strong box office, "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax" was an eyebrow-raiser this weekend. The $70.7 million that the movie took in domestically made it worthy of several superlatives -- among others, the biggest opening ever for a non-sequel animated film
Even for a season that has seen surprisingly strong box office, "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax" was an eyebrow-raiser this weekend. The $70.7 million that the movie took in domestically made it worthy of several superlatives -- among others, the biggest opening ever for a non-sequel animated film (a bit of a fudge given that the $70.47 million "The Incredibles" tallied was in 2004 dollars, but still impressive) as well as the biggest opening since July for any movie without the word "Twilight" in its title.

Among the lessons from this bounty are some obvious ones, like the fact that kids love cute, brightly colored animated creatures. 

Here, then, are five things we might not have expected coming into the weekend.

Animated blockbusters need a spring or holiday date. Big animation releases have been creeping up the calendar for a while now: "Monsters vs. Aliens," "How to Train Your Dragon" and several of the "Ice Age" movies all opened in mid- to late March. But none of those opened as strong as Universal Pictures/Illumination Entertainment's "Lorax." And "Rango," which a year ago went out on the same weekend as "Lorax," tallied barely half of the Seussian film's total. In fact, every other animated movie to open to at least $70 million did it in the far more fertile May-November period, per Box Office Mojo.

Picture books are a mixed bag. They've been bedtime favorites for generations. But movies based on picture books -- whether the films are animated, live-action or a combination thereof -- have made plenty of people turn off the lights. In the last few years, movies such as "Where the Wild Things Are" and "Mr. Popper's Penguins" "have been commercial disappointments, while even Seuss' own "The Cat in the Hat" flopped back in 2003. It's not easy for a 90-minute film to convince moviegoers it's filled in the gaps of such books -- at least, it wasn't easy before "Lorax."

Politics don't sell. Few animated movies take a hit from even one political flank. "Lorax" got it from both sides. Liberals said its many cross-promotions (Mazda SUVs, anyone?) betrayed Theodor Geisel's eco-friendly message, while Breitbartians said the movie was a Trojan horse for Hollywood-flavored liberalism. Either one might have been enough to keep sections of the moviegoing audience at home. It didn't -- proving that, perhaps, if you're going to annoy an ideological constituency, maybe it's best to annoy its opposite too.

Voices need names. Animated movies never have been as star-studded as they are now -- Owen Wilson, Anne Hathaway and Johnny Depp have all toplined them, getting paid millions, as Chris Rock might say, for reading some lines in a booth. But though "Lorax" didn't exactly go for unknowns, it rummaged somewhere besides the movie-star closet: the inflections of Danny Devito, Taylor Swift, Zac Efron and Ed Helms brought the main characters to life. Of course, it helps that Devito brings this much effort to the role.

Animated movies don't have to be good to make money. And by good, of course, we mean well-reviewed. The modern notion that the two go hand-in-hand was introduced by Pixar and bolstered by DreamWorks Animation -- see: the phenomenal  94% "Up" scored on Movie Review Intelligence, the very good 77% of "How to Train Your Dragon," or even the solid 69% for Illumination's earlier "Despicable Me." Sometimes it's seemed that quality and dollars have been almost inextricable. That's now been disproved by "The Lorax." The movie garnered just 57.8% on Movie Review Intelligence and prompted New York Times critic A.O. Scott to offer, in a phrase that went viral practically the moment he came up with it, that the film was a "noisy, useless piece of junk."

RELATED:

"The Lorax" targeted for its green credentials

"The Lorax" not quite what the doctor ordered, critics say

Box office: "The Lorax" posts year's biggest opening with $70.7 million

--Steven Zeitchik

twitter.com/ZeitchikLAT

Photo: A scene from "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax." Credit: Universal Pictures / Illumination Entertainment


'The Lorax': not quite what the doctor ordered, critics say

March 2, 2012 |  4:52 pm

Lxjsgmpd
The 2008 animated film "Horton Hears a Who" fared somewhat better than the live-action versions of 2000's "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" (a box-office hit) and 2003's widely panned "The Cat in the Hat."

And reviews are mixed for "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax," now playing in theaters. The animated feature tells the story of a boy searching for a real live tree in a deforested plastic land.

The Times'  Kenneth Turan (watch review below) finds that "The Lorax" strays too far from the source material. Although the film maintains the book's ecological message and offers "lively and colorful" visuals, Turan writes that "this movie version adds a whole lot of other stuff, most of it not very good and not in keeping with the spirit of the Seuss original."

PHOTOS: "The Lorax" premiere

"To expand Seuss' slim volume to theatrical feature length," Turan says, "a whole lot of plot and heaping handfuls of characters needed to be invented." Those plot elements and characters feel "forced" and "unpleasant," he concludes.

Continue reading »

Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video







Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: