24 Frames

Movies: Past, present and future

« Previous | 24 Frames Home | Next »

Critical Mass: 'Season of the Witch'

January 7, 2011 |  3:47 pm

Season-witch1

Just when it seemed like Nicolas Cage had managed to take his gonzo acting for the back-row style of performance in ever-schlockier productions and turn it into a career asset, "Season of the Witch" comes along and throws a curveball at everyone expecting another goony hoot fest.

Hard as it may be to believe, Cage appears to be taking this story of 14th century knights escorting an accused witch to a monastary totally seriously. Or at least in a more muted manner than his nicely packaged YouTube highlight reels would lead you to expect.

Now it's the critics who seem to be having a Cage-level freakout on Cage himself, who most say is reason No. 1 why this swords-and-sorcery romp is a collosal waste of time.

And not since "The Social Network" or "Toy Story 3" have the critics been this united in a single opinion on a film. Unfortunately for "Season of the Witch," that united opinion isn't positive.

"What's most disappointing, though, is how Cage seems to be sleepwalking through so much of it," writes Times reviewer Mark Olsen. "There are only occasional glimmers of Cage's singularly eccentric line-readings or moments when he turns conventional reaction shots on their head. Mostly they crop up just enough to serve as a reminder of their absence."

USA Today's Scott Bowles piles on, complaining, "Fish-out-of-water casting shouldn't be a problem for Cage, who regularly flourishes in unlikely roles. But he and co-star Ron Perlman are a little too clever, too sardonic and way too contemporary to convince as swordsmen in the 1300s."

New York Times reviewer Jeannette Catsoulis says Cage is "as convincing a Crusader as he was a combustible biker in 'Ghost Rider,' " and no, that's not a compliment.

Roger Ebert is no fan of the film, but at least he goes (somewhat) easier on Cage: "You know I am a fan of Nic Cage and Ron Perlman... Here, like cows, they devour the scenery, regurgitate it to a second stomach found only in actors and chew it as cud."

Ridiculously bored by the whole enterprise, critic Peter Howell of the Toronto Star has dreamed up some supernatural conspiracies to explain the inanity of what he was forced to see: "I’m convinced the glazed face of Cage’s renegade knight Behmen ... is due not to pressure from his ridiculous hairpiece, which resembles misplaced seaweed, but rather to devilish doings."

That's right: the devil himself was behind this film. Maybe there is something to this whole "banality of evil" thing after all.

— Patrick Kevin Day

Photo: Nicolas Cage in "Season of the Witch." Credit: Relativity Media.


 
Comments () | Archives (4)

The comments to this entry are closed.

The only people who give a ratz patootie what critics think, are the critics themselves. I mean, Day even slams Cages hair for crying out loud. Go figure. I guess when you're the only one at the concert, you like to hear yourself sing.

collosal? colossal maybe... ;}

Nicholas Cage stopped being relevant to anything about a dozen years ago. He now seems only interested in cashing a big paycheck occasionally so he can keep up the payments on his mansions.

Of course people pay attention to the critics. Smart people do anyway No one wants to be the poor dumb sap who wasted $9 and contributed to the $40 million opening of a crap movie like The Last Airbender, when he should have known better had he gone to Rotten Tomatoes and saw the universally panned reviews.

Though a critic may not have power individually, they have a lot of power by consensus.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video







Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: