24 Frames

Movies: Past, present and future

« Previous | 24 Frames Home | Next »

What's behind Will Ferrell's comeback? (And is it one?)

August 9, 2010 | 12:11 pm

Ferrell
There's been a lot of talk in Hollywood circles on Monday about Will Ferrell suddenly proving supple at the box office with a $35-million opening -- and likely $100-million domestic total -- for "The Other Guys."

Theories abound about Ferrell's success with the movie (which began life as "The B Team" and changed names to avoid confusion with "The A-Team"). After all, the actor had had his share of duds over the last few years with the likes of "Land of the Lost" and "Semi-Pro."

Ferrell hasn't changed his own brand of comedy that much between the hits and the failures, cultivating in most of these films a distinct dopily over-the-top persona with more success than he rightly deserves. So explanations have gone elsewhere. "The Other Guys," the experts say, is the kind of material Ferrell excels at (a more recognizable genre like a cop comedy). It had a well-crafted marketing campaign. It pairs Ferrell with sure-handed director Adam McKay. And the movie benefited from either smart or lucky timing (a comedy released late in a summer that's largely been devoid of them).

There's truth in all of these explanations. But maybe most salient is that in this hit, and nearly every other of his over the last four years, Ferrell had a charismatic and top-name co-star. He has one in "The Other Guys" (Mark Wahlberg), just as he did in "Step Brothers" (John C. Reilly), "Blades of Glory" (Jon Heder) and "Talladega Nights" (Sacha Baron Cohen, though with a little less screen time than the others). In his failures? Not so much.

The big-name co-star gives any film a marketing edge, since it means double the promotional power and, for audiences, twice the reason to see the film. But there may be a more substantive explanation as to why this works for Ferrell movies. The actor seems to do his best work, or at least the work we like most, when he's playing off someone. All four of his recent hits are a type of odd-couple comedy, while all three of his recent failures are not. In the last half-decade, this, it seems, is how we prefer to see Ferrell -- as a foil. We'd rather the actor share the screen than dominate it.

Looking back at Ferrell's recent trajectory, something else jumps out. Since "Talladega Nights  became a mega-hit four summers ago, the actor has had a number of failures and a number of successes. But he hasn't had any of them consecutively. His movies have essentially alternated at the box office: "Talladega" was a $148-million barnstormer, then "Stranger Than Fiction" made a modest $40 million. He came back with a tidy $118 million for "Blades of "Glory," then sank with the $33 million of "Semi-Pro." "Step Brothers" ushered in a comeback with a $100-million gross ... and then "Land of the Lost" put him in Nowheresville again. Now he's back with "The Other Guys."

Statisticians may call this an anomaly. When stars practice a one-for-us-and-one-for-them approach, after all, alternating results make sense. But outside of "Fiction," all of these movies are studio comedies.

Yet in light of what appears to be our preferred way for watching Ferrell -- in a certain dosage, with another star on screen to absorb some of the oxygen -- the every-other-year pattern makes a lot of sense. We still like seeing the actor. Just not all the time.

-- Steven Zeitchik

http://twitter.com/ZeitchikLAT

Photo: Mark Wahlberg and Will Ferrell in "The Other Guys." Credit: Sony Pictures

RECENT AND RELATED:

Other Guys in solid Ferrell territory

Other Guys to finally displace Inception

Other Guys Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg hammer out the Partner's Code


Clicking on Green Links will take you to a third-party e-commerce site. These sites are not operated by the Los Angeles Times. The Times Editorial staff is not involved in any way with Green Links or with these third-party sites.

 
Comments () | Archives (9)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Hey............... you bring in $33 mil ? He's a good guy.

It would be nice...really nice...if just once...Ferrell might try pulling in his over-the-top persona and show some real dramatic chops (even in a more level-headed comedy.) He shouldn't be in extremes ---huge duds or big hits all the time...try something smaller with a little bit of realism. He might find some new fans and hold on to the old ones at the same time.

Roger,

Have you seen Stranger Than Fiction?

You can't really compare Stranger Than Fiction to Talladega Nights. 40 million for Stranger Than Fiction was a good boxoffice take for an offbeat comedy that certainly didn't have the marketability of a Talladega or Step-Brothers.

Perhaps it's not Will Ferrel either. Columbia Pictures's marketing certainly had something to do with Talladega, Stranger Than Fiction, Step-Brothers, The Other Guys all being hits. Semi-Pro was New Line, Land of the Lost was Universal. Will Ferrel certainly has a better track record with Columbia Pictures movies, even Bewitched (2005) made 68 million and did equally well overseas.

Roger, why don't you try Stranger Than Fiction?

It doesn't hurt to be backed up by three headliners either . . .

Roger, I hear you, but I'm thinking of Jim Carrey when you say that . . . Jim Carrey used to be brilliant, I don't care how many "over-the-top" roles he played. Now he's kinda ruined that with stabs into psycho-drama, etc.

Will Farrel is smart enough (I'm not calling Jim Carrey dumb! Or Dumber!) to realize he's got to stay in a niche, and ride it out as long as possible . . . when the schtick wears off to the bone, he'll produce or something like that.

I like that he doesn't start to consider taking his "craft" to loftiness!

DID WILL FERRELL EVER HAVE A CAREER...NOT VERY FUNNY THEN OR NOW. MY QUESTION IS WHY IS THE LATIMES PIMPING FOR THIS THIRD RATE TALENT? HIS LATEST MOVIE IS A NASTY PIECE OF MEDIOCRITY. APPRENTLY, HE'S IN NEED OF MONEY AND WILL CRAWL ON HIS BELLY TO GET IT. ABSOLUTELY, LAME.

You lost me at calling Heder, Reilly and Cohen, top name co stars.
Ferrell rocks. But yes, in a comedy, he works best when someone shares the spotlight. Truth be told, I think WILL prefers that someone share it. Even in Stranger than Fiction, he was surrounded by a good ensemble cast.

I would hardly qualify Stranger Than Fiction as a failure! Sure it didn't do amazingly at the box office but it was a relatively low budget film and it did well with the critics. I thought it was a great film.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video







Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: