24 Frames

Movies: Past, present and future

« Previous | 24 Frames Home | Next »

Dueling 'Three Musketeers' projects sharpen their blades

February 24, 2010 |  6:27 pm

The Devil Wears Tunics? Mr. and Mrs. Milady ?

A pair of "Three Musketeers" projects are picking up momentum in Hollywood -- and attracting some rather unlikely elements.

MuskWith "Sherlock Holmes" fast turning into one of the most important properties in its stable, Warner Bros. is forging ahead on its adaptation of another pop-minded work of classic literature, "The Three Musketeers."

After confirming earlier this month that it was developing a new version with "Holmes" producer Lionel Wigram, the studio is making headway in hiring a director. It has compiled a wish list of those who it wants to get behind the camera to tell the swashbuckling story. But the names aren't necessarily the ones you'd expect. 

One filmmaker whom producers and studio executives are talking to: David Frankel, the director of "Marley & Me" and "The Devil Wears Prada." While the latter tells the story of a ruler colder and more villainous than Cardinal Richelieu, that pedigree may not be the kind one associates with high-stakes swordplay in period France.

But Frankel does have some genre experience -- and at Warners no less -- which last summer signed him to develop and potentially direct the adaptation of the children's series "Septimus Heap: Magyk." Not coincidentally, the series has been compared to Harry Potter, on which Wigram is also a driving force.

The second director in a top position to get the gig is Doug Liman, best known for "Mr. & Mrs. Smith" as well as the first movie in the Jason Bourne franchise. Liman's action pedigree gives him more credentials for "Musketeers" (though how he handled his last action film, "Jumper," may hurt those credentials).

Meanwhile, an independently-financed 3D project, based on the classic trilogy, from "Resident Evil" filmmaker Paul W.S. Anderson has over the last week stirred the talk that producers had wanted Taylor Lautner for a lead role, likely of D'Artagnan. But those with knowledge of the young actor's career said he would not star in the project.

Both scripts are being developed with an urgency -- "The Men Who Stare at Goats" writer Peter Straughan is a co-writer on the Warners one, while Anderson is co-writing the script with “The Tailor of Panama” screenwriter Andrew Davies.

Dumas' adventure book revolves around the adventures of D'Artagnan and the three musketeers, Athos, Porthos and Aramis, who fight off the villainous wards of Cardinal Richelieu. We could tell you more details from the book, but it's likely the story will be built into something else, just as screenwriters did with "Holmes." As for Anderson, well, we can only imagine what that one will look like.

The property has of course seen the big screen many times before, going back to the days of Lana Turner and Gene Kelly in the 1930s, or to the cheeseball days of 1993 with a movie arguably best known for that Sting-Rod Stewart-Bryan Adams song.

But that's not stopping Hollywood from pushing forward again. The property sits at the nexus of a number of recent trends: There's pre-awareness of the title, the rights are inexpensive (the book lies in the public domain) and it's perfect material to attract an elevated actor, a la Robert Downey Jr., who wants to do action with a literary gloss, even though it's anyone's guess who either of these films will actually land.

If all this can seem a little odd or even depressing, it may be worth keeping in mind that the 1993 version didn't exactly bring in the Oscar winners -- it starred Charlie Sheen.

-- Steven Zeitchik

Image: "The Three Musketeers." Credit: Oxford Classics



 
Comments () | Archives (3)

The comments to this entry are closed.

The Gene Kelly version is from the 1940s. There were several earlier versions including one from the silent era with Douglas Fairbanks that was absolutely wonderful.

My biggest takeaways from the 1993 version was that Chris O'Donnell's curly wig made him look like someone's Aunt Sylvia, and that Kiefer Sutherland was a pretty good actor.

I also notice that you made no mention of the nearly perfect version from the 1970s, which along with its sequel, The Four Musketeers was probably the most faithful to the book's tone and story.

My only hope is that they do the swordfights well in whichever new version is made. Flash cutting is far less enjoyable than watching a real fight from a sustained perspective.

You also fail to note that in the last film version of the 'Man in the Iron Mask,' the lead actors had something like 6 or 7 Oscar nominations amongst them with one winner, Jeremy Irons. So I 'm not sure luring talent to the material is much of an issue.

And as was noted, the 1973 version was a stellar piece of film making about which I only quibbled with the casting of Raquel Welch. Everyone and everything else was pitch perfect as they were in the Four Musketeers. Those films also included multiple nominees/winners.

And I wouldn't even quibble with the casting of Raquel Welch in that incredible motion picture, directed by Richard Lester.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video







Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: