Money & Company

Tracking the market and economic trends
that shape your finances.

Real Estate | Autos | Consumer | Economy

« Previous Post | Money & Company Home | Next Post »

FDIC nears deal to sell IndyMac to partnership

December 29, 2008 |  2:47 pm

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is nearing a deal to sell IndyMac Bank to a partnership of private New York investors, nearly six months after the Pasadena mortgage lender was taken over by regulators.

The partnership includes buyout expert Christopher Flowers, hedge-fund operator John Paulson and Steven Mnuchin, chairman of private equity firm Dune Capital Management, a person familiar with the matter told me today.

No deal had been signed as of this morning, sources at IndyMac and at the regulatory agencies said. One said an announcement would come "hopefully today" and in any case by the Dec. 31 target the FDIC has set for a sale.

None of the investors in the partnership could be reached for comment.

Indymachq Mnuchin is one of two former Goldman Sachs real-estate fund managers who founded Dune Capital in 2004. The firm is best known for stalking opportunistic real estate investments. Mnuchin's interest in a deal for IndyMac was first reported on Friday.

Flowers has been approved by bank regulators to buy a troubled Missouri commercial bank.

Paulson, who made billions of dollars betting that the housing and mortgage markets would implode, gave $15 million in October 2007 to help the advocacy group Center for Responsible Lending establish the Institute for Foreclosure Legal Assistance.

If the deal goes through as anticipated, the reborn IndyMac would operate under a new charter granted by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the arm of the U.S. Treasury that oversees savings and loans, several sources said.

The OTS, IndyMac’s chief regulator before the lender collapsed, came under fire in a recent report from the Treasury Department’s inspector general, which said the regulator allowed IndyMac to alter its financial statements last May in a way that concealed the extent of its problems.

It wasn’t until July that IndyMac, a spinoff from Countrywide Financial Corp., was shut down by regulators under the weight of its troubled adjustable-rate mortgages, typically "jumbo" loans made without verifying borrowers’ incomes, and a run on deposits.

At last estimate, the debacle was expected to cost the federal deposit insurance fund $8.9 billion, but the terms of a sale could change that figure.

Key details of the expected transaction remain unclear, including whether IndyMac customers who had deposits too large to be fully insured by the FDIC would recover their losses. So far, these depositors have had access to only 50% of their uninsured balances.

It also was unclear to what extent the FDIC, which has operated IndyMac since July, might provide backstops to the deal, perhaps by agreeing to share future losses on the lender’s mortgage portfolio.

Banking consultant Bert Ely of Alexandria, Va., said in an e-mail to me over the weekend that he believed the FDIC’s $8.9-billion loss figure for IndyMac would rise. He also questioned whether the private-equity deal was as certain as news accounts made it sound late last week:

Given IndyMac’s checkered history, this deal is going to be examined quite closely as well as its results going forward. I can’t imagine that the regulators will let the new management get too adventuresome with insured deposits ... which raises this most important question: How are the new owners going to make a decent rate of return on their invested capital given (1) IndyMac’s lousy deposit franchise, (2) the likelihood that in many cases the market value of properties collateralizing the mortgages IndyMac owns have not yet bottomed out, and (3) the likely high costs of servicing the mortgages IndyMac has in its servicing portfolio due to all the problem mortgages in that servicing portfolio?

In a phone interview, Ely said, "I'm not predicting anything." But because of the complexities involved, he added: "Until we see a final agreement I would not be surprised to see this deal blow up."

-- E. Scott Reckard

Photo: IndyMac headquarters in Pasadena. Credit: Al Seib/Los Angeles Times

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

http://www.indymacdepositors.com

FDIC and the government said that uninsured depositors were going to be OK
How come they talk about bailing out foreclosures and helping people who made mistakes on taking larger loans that they had no money.
Indymac took our money and now our deposits are frozen on their dime. How come no one is talking about that. Where is the accountability??? for an average US Citizen?
Mr. Schummer, we need you to step up. Everyone stepped up when failures were announced, bailouts were announced, banks did not have to give any accountabilty, automakers are being bailed out, no one is taking any money out of executives pockets, yet our money that is hard earned is at stake, FDIC with this sale will not lose a dime as they are first in line. WHAT ABOUT US? This is not fair - GOVERNMENT!

please see the fdic's mission statement LINK from their website as quoted directly below and you make your own assessment. FDIC EXAMINES AND SUPERVISES FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

I am not sure if they actually supervised it well when more than 38+ major banks in this country failed. If money was managed well we would not have been in this state. The Mission Statement of FDIC means what FDIC stands for. Does it really when 10,000 uninsured depositors are left out when billions of dollars are being given to financial institutions and by the way there is NO ACCOUNTABILITY!!!!!!! Insured or Uninsured - that is not the point - People like us had their kids future invested and we were misled by the inconsistent paperwork and transactions within our account. Where is the justice?

http://www.fdic.gov/about/mission/index.html

Check the string of events:
- July (prime time of elections) is when the news of Indymac made public.
- If FDIC as it states were forward thinking why that time July 2008 and not a year before
- You only have Indymac Uninsured Depositors affected. all other bank deals made behind close doors. Who made that happen
- Banks get bailout but not ask for Accountability. After all it is us (THE TAXPAYERS) paying for this
- Executives make golden parachutes (merrill lynch CEO makes $71M in compensation). No one at Executive Ranks is questioned
- Even after first round of funding Where is the Money trickling
- In the last week OTS Irregularities with Indymac are found
- Sale of Indymac to come just after Christmas when families of uninsured depositors and all others are focussed with their holidays and families
- The last event:
- A private equity firm led by former Goldman, Sachs & Co. executives is the likely buyer of IndyMac Bank

See some similarities!!!!

If there was irregularities and in all our accounts there were mistakes how come government is letting this sale go on!

I think the judicial system needs to look at the inconsistencies and if there are errors then uninsured depositors should be protected.




Advertisement





Archives