Money & Company

| Main |

A bottom in housing? That's a big 'No' at this confab

2:50 PM, April 28, 2008

I'm at the annual Milken Institute global conference today in Beverly Hills, where 3,000 people from around the planet get together to hear 130 panel discussions on the big issues of the day.

Naturally, you couldn't have a meeting like this without the U.S. housing crisis being at the top of the list of hot topics. So what follows are some of the highlights from a packed morning session entitled "Real Estate: Where Is the Bottom?" (The short answer: not here.)

Brian Fabbri, chief economist for North America at global investment bank BNP Paribas: He sees no chance that home prices will bottom anytime soon, given the glut of supply on the market. Despite that glut, "Builders are still building more homes for sale than people are buying today." As for hopes that mortgage delinquencies might peak soon, "We're going through a recession. In every recession we lose 1.5 to 2 million jobs. We'll lose most of those jobs through the second half of this year."  So the math doesn't add up at all for a respite from mortgage-loan defaults, he figures.

Sam Zell, real estate investment legend and now the head of Tribune Co., the L.A. Times' parent: "What this country needs is a cleansing" in the residential market. "We need to clear out all of those people who should never have been in houses in the first place and who for sure shouldn't be getting sympathy." He blamed another Sam -- Uncle in Washington -- for encouraging homeownership at any cost in recent years. The rise in the U.S. homeownership rate from 63% to 69% during the boom was totally unjustified, Zell said, other than by "the political impetus of, 'Let's put more people into homes they can't afford. ' "

Bobby Turner, managing partner of investment firm Canyon Capital Advisors: He and Canyon are big fans of urban real estate in cities with growing immigrant populations (Canyon has partnered up with Earvin "Magic" Johnson in urban development). But the real estate market in general, he suggested, has too many buyers hovering, thinking it's time to grab bargains. "I think you've got this universe of investors that really don't understand the nuances of real estate." Although Canyon has capital to invest, Turner said, he's content "to sit on the sidelines awhile and let people make mistakes."

Posted April 28, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00e55201ac808833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A bottom in housing? That's a big 'No' at this confab:

Comments

Tom-

Great to see you're blogging. I was always on the look out for your column on the weekends. More of you is better. Would be great to get some of your opinions on what you're seeing in addition to what you're seeing.

Bush and Cheney 'We proved under Reagan, Deficits Don't Matter"... ordered Comptroller of Currency to Block State Attorney Generals from Regulating Mortgage Loans, causing Housing meltdown. Cheney Secret "Energy Policy" of Iraq Oil takeover costing $ 750 Billion So Far....

ARE ALL TURNING USA INTO 3RD WORLD - 70 percent of Americans will Rent Not Own Homes and Middle Class will Disappear!
Hoover= "Great Depression 1929" -- Bush="Great Depression 2008"

It is a shame that Bobby Turner gives off the impression that housing is an "investment". Most people want a "home". Unfortunately, a lot of people aren't just sitting on the sidelines waiting for a "good deal" they are waiting for house prices to come back to realistic levels based on REALITY (ie - income) and also, another factor to this "sideline sitting" is that the money is just not available in the mass and unregulated quantities it once was.

Not to mention, the banks are holding on tight to the prices these homes were once selling for in the boom because they don't want to have to show these huge losses either. The bottom line is someone will have to pay for all of this greed (taxpayers??? reallY???). The word "bailout" to me means "welfare for the rich".

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Recent Comments
SEC may put California IOUs under fraud-protection rules
The State Board of Equalization will be ...
comment by Mark K.
Looking to sell a California IOU? Read this first
@Michael: SEC has no jurisdiction over ...
comment by Tom Petruno
Looking to sell a California IOU? Read this first
I referred to your blog and your informa...
comment by Michael
Why investors need to reconsider what 'risk' really means
There is no arguing with Howard Marks s...
comment by martscan
Why investors need to reconsider what 'risk' really means
The tricky thing is the fact that the pr...
comment by Nikkei 225
Jittery investors bet slide in Treasury yields isn't over
At some point, the Treasury Dept has to ...
comment by mr.bilko
Our Blogger
Tom Petruno
Tom Petruno
Tom Petruno has been chronicling financial markets' highs and lows since 1979, and has been the Times' financial columnist since 1990. He writes on markets, corporate finance and the economy, and how it all ties in to individual investors' portfolios.

INVESTING TIPS AND TOOLS

Quote:

Finance Tools

DJIANASDAQSPX