L.A. NOW

Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Prop. 8: Ruling to have limited effect outside California

February 7, 2012 | 10:43 am
Opponents of Prop. 8 demonstrate outside of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday in San Francisco.

A federal appeals court Tuesday overturned Proposition 8 on narrow grounds, ruling that Californians took away a right from a minority group without justification when they approved the 2008 ban on same-sex marriage.

The 2-1 decision by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will have limited effect outside California because it is based on voter repeal of a right a minority already enjoyed.

"The people may not employ the initiative power to single out a disfavored group for unequal treatment and strip them, without a legitimate justification, of a right as important as the right to marry," the court said.

FULL COVERAGE: Prop. 8

PHOTOS: Proposition 8 ruled unconstitutional

Santa Clara University constitutional law Professor Margaret M. Russell said the ruling overturned Proposition 8 on “the narrowest grounds possible,” which makes it less likely that the U.S. Supreme Court would review it.

“It is very much anchored in the role of Proposition 8 in California’s history,” the professor said, adding that it would have little effect outside of California.

The ruling was based on a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Colorado initiative that prevented local governments from passing anti-discrimination ordinances to protect gays and lesbians.

The high court in that case said the federal constitution prevents states from taking away rights from minorities because of moral disapproval.

In a separate decision,  the appeals court refused to invalidate the federal court ruling by retired Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker on the grounds that he should have disclosed he was in a long term same-sex relationship.  Walker, a Republican appointee who is openly gay, said after his ruling  that he had been in a relationship with another man for 10 years. He has never said whether he and his partner wished to marry.

The backers of Proposition 8 can appeal Tuesday's decision to a larger panel of the 9th Circuit or go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. The high court is expected to be divided on the issue.

Gays and lesbians were entitled to marry in California for six months after the California Supreme Court struck down a state ban in May 2008. The state high court later upheld Proposition 8 as a valid amendment of the California Constitution.

ALSO:

L.A. school sex abuse claims: Deasy sends letter to all employees

Prop. 8: New weddings unlikely right away if measure struck down

Roseanne Barr announces bid for president as Green Party candidate

-- Maura Dolan in San Francisco

Photo: Opponents of Prop. 8 demonstrate outside of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday in San Francisco. Credit: Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

Comments 

Advertisement










Video