Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Surfers, fisherman blast plan for wave farm off San Onofre coast

Sanon An Orange County entrepreneur wants to tap the power of the ocean waves off San Onofre State Beach by building one of the nation's first hydrokinetic wave farms.

To surfers, conservationists and fishing groups that fiercely protect San Onofre as one of the California coast's natural treasures, the idea is a half-baked proposal that has so far ignored potential effects on wildlife, surf patterns and even training exercises at the nearby Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.

Environmental groups, which are broadly supportive of renewable energy projects, said putting the devices in the waters of San Onofre could harm marine life and potentially mar the view from the coastline. Surfers are worried it would dampen waves and alter seafloor terrain along a stretch of coast famed for its surf breaks. Sport-fishing groups said a wave farm could block off favored waters for sand bass, bonito and barracuda fishing.

Federal energy regulators have given JD Products of Fountain Valley permission to begin a three-year study looking at the feasibility of installing thousands of ocean wave electricity generators a mile off San Onofre State Beach. The firm's general manager, Chong Hun Kim, said he chose the site because it is close to transmission lines that serve the San Onofre nuclear power plant. Kim said he hoped to connect offshore generators to the power grid through underwater cables and sell power to the plant's operator, Southern California Edison.

Read the full story: San Onofre wave farm idea churns up concerns


Temperatures could reach 90s as heat wave hits L.A.

New plastic trash cans dotting the beach stir debate in Newport

La Cañada Flintridge tries to combat rowdy teen parties, underage drinking

-- Tony Barboza

 Map: Project at San Onofre. Credit: Paul Duginski / Los Angeles Times

Comments () | Archives (1)

I don’t think this proposal should be approved. I believe that the only people benefiting is JD products corp and Southern cal Edison just to supply more energy to their plant. Society is at cost here. So is the environment. Recreationists who are, a large number mind you, because this stretch of water goes way back into history and is known to surfers and fisherman to be some of the best waters off of the southern cal coast. This proposed action will definitely affect waves and ocean wildlife. We need to protect our environment and recreational activities. Just recently they banned fishing in Laguna Beach. This is ridiculous. My grand kids won’t have anything left to enjoy. I could understand if the benefit stretched to us the taxpayers but this is a case where the cost definitely outweighs any potential benefits.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...


About L.A. Now
L.A. Now is the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news section for Southern California. It is produced by more than 80 reporters and editors in The Times’ Metro section, reporting from the paper’s downtown Los Angeles headquarters as well as bureaus in Costa Mesa, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, Ventura and West Los Angeles.
Have a story tip for L.A. Now?
Please send to newstips@latimes.com
Can I call someone with news?
Yes. The city desk number is (213) 237-7847.


Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: