L.A. in line for $258.8 million in surplus DWP funds
The Los Angeles City Council voted 11 to 1 on Friday to pave the way for a $258.8-million transfer from the Department of Water and Power to city coffers.
The drama-free discussion was a sharp contrast to last year, when DWP officials threatened to withhold part of their transfer unless council members agreed to increase electricity rates.
That threat led to a lengthy showdown between the DWP, the council and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.
Friday’s decision upheld a plan by the five-member DWP board, which designated the money as surplus Feb. 1.
Because Councilman Richard Alarcon voted no, the matter will require a second vote next week.
ALSO:
Rains falling, but snow possible in low-elevation areas
Student charged in killing of vocational school teacher
Former teacher is accused of giving alcohol to students
-- David Zahniser at Los Angeles City Hall








What surplus? All the news media are reporting that DWP has been overcharging residents for the past many years and are owed refunds. What gives?
Posted by: anon | February 25, 2011 at 05:31 PM
DWP - keep the $$$ and repair the deteriorating infrastructure that exist throughout LA. As for the City of Angels - so-called leaders need to take "City Management and Finances 101".
Posted by: Gem | February 25, 2011 at 08:37 PM
How about returning it to the over-charged rate payers?
The scam continues, unabated.
Posted by: GEAH | February 26, 2011 at 01:47 AM
Alarcon probably wants the money for himself. I have yet to fathom how the transfer is not a tax on the ratepayer who pays for water, power, refuse collection, and sewer but apparently we are paying too much. So much more as to generate a two hundred million dollar plus "surplus". Then they transfer it to the general fund. How is that not a tax?
Posted by: RwH | February 26, 2011 at 06:09 AM
Nevermind the DWP has to kill a lot of infrastructure and renewable energy projects now to just to show it has a surplus so the City gets theirs.
Posted by: Just Another Sucker | February 27, 2011 at 09:23 AM