L.A. NOW

Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Sheriff Lee Baca to unseal the Ruben Salazar files

Silver Dollar Bar 

Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca told The Times on Monday that he will allow the media to review eight boxes of documents related to the slaying of journalist Ruben Salazar, a case that has been clouded by controversy and speculation for 40 years.

Baca said the records, long kept from public view, will be available after the Office of Independent Review formally releases its report on Salazar's slaying Tuesday. A draft copy of that report was obtained by The Times and made public over the weekend.

Documents: The Ruben Salazar Files, a reporter under law enforcement scrutiny much of his career

Reporters will be allowed to review the records under the supervision of sheriff's employees, though no copies will be provided, and no cameras will be allowed, Baca said.

"I'm willing to share the information, but I don’t think I can share ownership," Baca said. "In today's world with whatever technology is out there, I think original documents must remain original. I don't think anybody else should be taking these documents, blacking out parts of these documents. ... I'm extraordinarily aware that documents can be altered."

Salazar's relatives in recent months have been allowed access to the records, but had to sign confidentiality agreements preventing them from discussing the information.

Salazar was an award-winning Times reporter and KMEX-TV news director. His killing became a monumental moment in the Mexican American civil rights movement. After his death, Salazar became an iconic figure, with parks, schools, scholarships and even a U.S. postage stamp named in his honor.

The report by the Sheriff's Department's civilian watchdog concluded that a series of tactical mistakes by deputies led to the Aug. 29, 1970, slaying of the newsman. Salazar was shot in the head by a tear-gas missile as he took a break in a bar while covering a demonstration in East Los Angeles that had become a riot.

In the weeks leading up to his slaying, Salazar and his KMEX crew had been investigating allegations of misconduct by sheriff's deputies and Los Angeles police. The newsman had told friends that he thought he was being shadowed by authorities and feared they might do something to discredit his reporting.

The report also said there was no evidence that deputies had Salazar under surveillance or intentionally targeted the newsman after he entered the Silver Dollar Cafe.

The report acknowledged that its conclusions were limited on the key issue in Salazar's slaying -- whether he was a victim of a plot by authorities -- because sheriff's homicide detectives at the time discounted theories that the newsman was killed intentionally. As a result, they failed to ask questions that might have prevented the speculation and conspiracy theories that haunt the case to this day.

Baca said the Office of Independent Review's report detailing deputies' actions leading up to Salazar's death shows how far the department has come in the last four decades. Deputies today, Baca said, receive more training and are under tougher scrutiny from supervisors. Tear gas, for example, could not be shot into an occupied space under current protocol without approval from a higher-up.

"We would leave the problem intact until we had the right resources to go after someone with a gun," Baca said.

Though Baca acknowledged shortcomings in the department’s handling of the incident, he also laid blame on rioters. Baca, a young sergeant at the time, was present at the demonstration, and said he saw out-of-town protesters breaking benches, smashing windows and throwing rocks at deputies.

"I don't think it gave the department a black eye as much as it was tragedy that was unintended by the department and the deputies," Baca said. "The black eye, if there's any black eye, was the extraordinary amount of rioting going on during Mr. Salazar’s death ... the nature of rioting can lead to consequences unintended."

"I don't think that's an excuse for what happened to Mr. Salazar ... but Mr. Salazar would not have been there in that cafe if he didn't feel the danger in the community," he said.

Baca said the department today would investigate a similar incident more thoroughly. Along with a probe by homicide detectives, the training bureau would examine deputies' actions for potential policy violations, Baca said.

The incident would also be reviewed by the OIR, he said, so no conclusions would be arrived at "without any outside eyes."

Baca said he also disagreed with former Los Angeles Police Chief Ed Davis' response to Salazar's reporting, particularly a 1970 meeting the former chief had with Salazar. Davis angrily accused Salazar of fabricating information about a meeting he had with Latino journalists. 

"In today's generation of law-enforcement leaders, we wouldn’t do that," Baca said. "We understand that freedom of press is all about criticism, and it's part of what the press is obligated to do to keep government from getting away with everything it can get away with it."

That meeting, Baca said, may have been why Salazar was worried he was being followed.

RELATED:

Report says there is no evidence Ruben Salazar was targeted in killing

Friends say Ruben Salazar beleived his life was in danger

Ruben Salazar clashed with LAPD in months before his slaying

-- Robert Faturechi and Robert J. Lopez

Photo: Gun-wielding deputy at the Silver Dollar moments before Ruben Salazar was killed. Credit: Raul Ruiz

 
Comments () | Archives (9)

It is remarkable that Civil Rights-era killings have to wait 40 or 50 years to be investigated properly or solved in America--after the suspects/perpetrators have retired and are close to death. Usually it happens in the deep South, Mississippi or Chile, but I guess LA County has people who would defer justice, too.

I wouldn't trust anything that Baca handed over.

Why is it up to the Sheriff? However incomplete and sanitized they may be, these are public records of historical importance. Once agai, the accused assassins maintain control of all the evidence for no explainable reason other than to protect the accused assassins.

Baca has given no legitimate reason why he alone should control access to these documents and deny the people the right to see what they say. Isn't this what the Freedom of Information Act is all about?

There is no excuse for not making these files public on the Internet with full transparency. At least a Digital Archive on a web site. That is totally feasible. Then any "altered" copies can easily be discredited against the originals (in public view).

With today's advanced Ricoh "industrial-strength" large scanner/copiers, I myself can scan over 800 pages (auto-feed) into PDF documents... and have them posted on a web site within 3 hours (I've done done it before).

The Sheriffs Department can't use the excuse of "the technology doesn't exist". It most certainly exists. I'm sure the Department has a contract with a copy machine vendor. Put it on the Internet so that reporters and scholars can investigate the truth.

For a little background on this from the past read at Hunter Thompson's article in the Rolling Stone #81, 4/29/71. Seems the LAPD is still covering this up. As soon as I saw the Ruben Salazar headline I remembered Hunter's story of what happened from his perspective. Forty years later and still no justice

Its funny how this article keeps implying the streets were so dangerous he (Salazar) was inside a bar. The Black eye is if the streets were so chaotic why would a officer need to shoot inside a bar. The people react to injustices, Cairo and other countries in the middle east are a prime example of this.

Love the U.S. but its ran just as corrupt as other nations. We should of had a nationwide revolt back when bush initialy got elected.

Umm I don't really believe the Sheriffs.

Sheriff Baca's decision to allow limited access to the Ruben Salazar files is a disingenuous move on his part to make it appear like he is being transparent and fair in allowing the public access to these materials. By denying the media and other experts the ability to make copies or photographs, Sheriff Baca is greatly impairing the extent to which these files can be scrutinized by the public. In this era of advanced social and digital media, it would be easy to make reproductions in order to allow experts to study the materials at length and at their leisure instead of only being able to see them for limited periods of time. Also, by not allowing pictures or copies of the files, Sheriff Baca is prohibiting the general public from being able to judge for themselves the import of these materials.

I don't believe that our sheriff is trying to limit access to the files on Ruben Salazar which he is about to open.

These eight boxes of material were carefully reviewed and received a PG rating.
Everyone from anywhere will have an opportunity to get up close with the files for their scholarly research.

Supervised. Please initial the sign in sheet.
Sheriff Baca will need at least 2, maybe 3 full-time sheriffs to supervise the Salazar document viewing and research archive.

Isn't that what you wanted Supervisors Molina and Ridley-Thomas?
So of course you will vote to approve the Sheriff Dept's monthly request for reimbursement of wages for supervision of the Salazar files.

Alright, who has been naughty and who has been nice? Who needs some hours?


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video

About L.A. Now
L.A. Now is the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news section for Southern California. It is produced by more than 80 reporters and editors in The Times’ Metro section, reporting from the paper’s downtown Los Angeles headquarters as well as bureaus in Costa Mesa, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, Ventura and West Los Angeles.
Have a story tip for L.A. Now?
Can I call someone with news?
Yes. The city desk number is (213) 237-7847.

Categories




Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: