Eli Broad, others pledge $100 million to Teach for America endowment
Philanthropist Eli Broad and three other donors announced Thursday a $100-million endowment to make Teach for America a permanent teacher-training program.
Broad's foundation pledged $25 million to the endowment, spurring three other matching donations from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Robertson Foundation and philanthropists Steve and Sue Mandel, officials said.
Education-reform efforts are a major thrust of the Southern California-based Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation. Teach for America, which has a local regional office, currently has 270 teachers working in the Los Angeles area.
Teach for America typically draws from the brightest recent college grads, sending more than 28,000 recruits over the past 20 years to teach for two years in some of the nation’s most challenging urban schools.
Two-thirds of alumni continue to work full time in education, half of them as classroom teachers, according to the organization. More than 550 have become school principals or district superintendents.
Others hold influential positions in other fields, including journalism, public-policy foundations and government. A primary aim of founder Wendy Kopp was to draw talent and public interest to the challenge of supporting and improving public education.
“Under Wendy Kopp’s leadership, Teach for America has quickly evolved from an innovative idea into what has become nothing less than an enduring American institution that has forever changed the landscape of public education,” Broad said in a statement.
Among the most high-profile alums is outspoken former District of Columbia schools chancellor Michelle Rhee, a heroine to many school reformers and a bête noire to many teachers and teacher unions. Her stormy tenure included a much-watched initiative linking teacher evaluations to student performance on standardized tests. The results contributed to scores of teacher firings.
More recently, a coalition of groups has challenged the designation of TFA’s rookie teachers — who enter the classroom after a brief, whirlwind training regimen — as highly qualified. They assert that many hard-to-staff urban public schools and charter schools claiming to be staffed by highly qualified teachers are not.
On Thursday, these groups sent a letter to President Obama decrying a new federal law “lowering teaching standards” required under the federal No Child Left Behind Law. The legislation, supported by TFA, followed on the heels of successful litigation that challenged the designation of uncredentialed teachers as highly qualified.
“The provision allows thousands of under-prepared and inexperienced teachers to continue to be assigned disproportionately to low-income, minority, special education and English language learner students and denies parents notification of the teachers’ under-prepared status,” said a statement from Public Advocates, a San Francisco-based law firm that spearheaded the legal challenge. The provision benefitting TFA “was quietly added by key congressional leaders” into an interim budget resolution Congress passed late last year allowing the government to continue paying its bills.
Charter schools are free, publicly funded and run independently of school districts. Many rely heavily on early-career teachers from TFA and other programs. The relatively low salaries of these uncredentialed first- and second-year teachers have helped many charters lower staffing costs.
This has helped charters hire more teachers and offer classes with fewer students. It also allows charters to assert in required public disclosures that all of these teachers are highly qualified.
The new endowment will generate about 2% of Teach for America’s annual operating budget, officials said, as part of many funding sources and grants that support the organization.
Teach for America recently announced plans to double in size by 2015. Currently, more than 8,200 corps members are teaching in 39 places around the country, according to TFA.
The Broad Foundation awards an annual prize to a school district it regards as a leader in innovative reforms. The foundation also is known for awarding grants to charter schools and for funding a training program for top school-district administrators. Incoming L.A. schools Supt. John Deasy is an alum of that program.
-- Howard Blume








If the Teach for America philosophy is the one being touted as the new panacea in education reform, then I don't understand the rational behind the new layoff provision for teachers that was recently enacted in LAUSD. I thought having a revolving door of teachers was supposed to be a bad thing, but in the case of Teach for America, it's okay. Can somebody please explain to me the difference here?
Posted by: marianne | January 27, 2011 at 10:03 PM
It certainly is considered bad at schools like Gompers in South L.A. Many "hard to staff" schools for years had an incentive program called UCTP (I always knew it as EIS), an extra $1000 for 44 hours of work such as supervision at games and events, sponsoring clubs, & tutoring. This was akin to the bonus in "Christmas Vacation". It really didn't make the difference, just helped, but we still had 40/250 teachers at Fremont leave every year. Don't know about the other schools around there, but if you have teachers at a school for only 2-3 years, that's just long enough for them to get used to where they are and what they are doing. So, investing in this sort of teacher is going to improve schools, eh?
Posted by: Chuck Olynyk | January 30, 2011 at 03:14 PM
Teach for America claims to help put "well qualified" educators in classrooms. Yet they bypass the full year of coursework and student teaching required for a teaching credential in CA, and instead provide participants with a few weeks of training. Graduating from a respected university does not automatically qualify one to teach successfully. Furthermore, these participants agree to teach for just two years, ensuring the revolving door of educators in schools where children most need stability.
What would be more helpful would be "Aide for America" which would put these same eager young adults into classrooms as an additional support to a highly qualified teacher.
Posted by: krista M | January 30, 2011 at 03:41 PM
Teach for America , what a joke they go thru them to get there training and claim to be qualified yet they have no credentials, their so called educators have not passed CSET,RICA, or CBEST, they should not be allowed in a classroom period.
Posted by: Gil | January 30, 2011 at 09:09 PM
In response to Gil:
New incoming corps members in LA and the Bay Area are required to take and pass both the CSET and the CBEST before the start of the summer prior to their first year of teaching. If they fail either or both of these tests they must defer to the next year. While teaching for two years, they are enrolled in a credentialing program at a local university (Loyola Marymount for LA corps members) and can also chose to enroll in classes to achieve their master's degree.
Posted by: Lauren G | April 03, 2011 at 07:18 PM