Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Villaraigosa's former DWP general manager joins L.A. law firm

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s former head of the Department of Water and Power has taken a job at a Los Angeles-based law firm that has performed legal work for city agencies over the last decade.
H. David Nahai, who abruptly resigned as the DWP’s top executive last October, will join Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard and Smith as a member of the firm’s energy, environment and water practice, and its real estate practice.
In recent years, the firm has represented the city in lawsuits involving the Angels Flight railway in downtown Los Angeles, efforts to seize property in South Los Angeles using the power of eminent domain and a dispute with a tenant of the city’s airport in Van Nuys, according to city records. Nevertheless, Nahai said he would focus on building the firm’s business with private sector companies and among certain public sector agencies -- not the city of Los Angeles.
“The idea of working with the city does not figure into my thinking at the present time,” he said Tuesday.
Nahai left the DWP under fire from both the mayor’s office and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 18, the DWP’s powerful employee union. As a lawyer with Lewis Brisbois, he will maintain his own consulting practice and continue as a senior adviser to the Clinton Climate Initiative, which focuses on efforts to address the issue of global warming.

During Nahai’s tenure at the DWP, first as a commissioner and then as general manager, the utility increased the amount of renewable power it uses, from 3% of its energy portfolio to 15%. The utility also embarked on a successful effort to persuade Angelenos to use less water.
-- David Zahniser at Los Angeles City Hall

Comments () | Archives (3)

He brought Raman Raj and that's the biggest mistake.
Corruption becomes the rule now.

We use less water, but yet the rates continue to climb. Shouldn't we be rewarded for using less water, not punished? I guess in a world where politicians and appointed cronies are rewarded for failure, and the taxpayers are punished for success, it all makes sense.

Use less water because we are in a chronic shortage, but approve zoning variances that double and triple the number of water fixture units and increase water consumption.

So which is it? Chronic waters shortages that justify consumer's cutback on water usage or approvals for hi density endless growth projects that are not sustainable?


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...


About L.A. Now
L.A. Now is the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news section for Southern California. It is produced by more than 80 reporters and editors in The Times’ Metro section, reporting from the paper’s downtown Los Angeles headquarters as well as bureaus in Costa Mesa, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, Ventura and West Los Angeles.
Have a story tip for L.A. Now?
Please send to newstips@latimes.com
Can I call someone with news?
Yes. The city desk number is (213) 237-7847.


Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: