Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Closing statements begin in McCourt divorce trial

In the Frank and Jamie McCourt divorce trial Wednesday, Jamie McCourt's attorney accused Frank McCourt of deceit and accused the attorney who drafted the L.A. Dodgers ownership agreement of misconduct.

In closing statements in L.A. County Superior Court, attorney Dennis Wasser said the agreement was explained to Frank McCourt in 2008, and he responded by saying it should be changed to grant Jamie McCourt an ownership interest in the Dodgers.

But attorney Larry Silverstein never followed through, Wasser said.

Silverstein drafted the agreement that Frank McCourt says gives him sole ownership of the Dodgers and which Jamie McCourt wants thrown out. The agreement was signed in 2004.

"When Frank found out in 2008 how the agreement operated, what he did was take advantage of it," Wasser said.

Wasser attacked the credibility of Frank McCourt and Silverstein, arguing that Jamie McCourt had asked for Silverstein's files in April, but she was not informed until August that a page in the agreement had been switched.

The original trial date had been May 24.

"The other side said it was critical they went to trial in May of this year, in June of this year," Wasser said. "Now we know why."

He also said Silverstein had a motive for claiming not to remember he had switched the page that listed the Dodgers as community property for one that listed the team as Frank McCourt's property.

By stating he intentionally altered a signed document after the fact without notifying the parties, Wasser said, Silverstein could be subject to disbarment and/or criminal prosecution.

Silverstein testified the switch reflected the innocent correction of a mistake.

Wasser pointed out Silverstein did not correct another error in the document, one that said the parties each had their own lawyer. Silverstein had represented both.

"I know why," Wasser said. "It's on the signature page. He couldn't have changed [that paragraph] without telling Jamie."

-- Bill Shaikin at L.A. County Superior Court

Comments () | Archives (7)


you guys are the worst reporters ever... one side, one side, one side.

boy, can't you just see the dollar signs of happiness in the eyes of Jamie in the photo?

This entire situation is ridiculous. I hope they are forced to sell the team. How could anyperson in their right mind think the McCourt's a suitable owners in MLB? They are a disgrace to the game of bassball, the city of Los Angeles, and a huge waste of taxpayers money for this trial. SELL THE TEAM.

Dodger fans want nothing to do with the McCourts. Their greed is ruining the franchise. I have not attended a game in months. I refuse to have my hard earned money go towards spousal support. Shame on both of them. Sell the team.

SM, you said a mouthful. I went to only three games in 2010 (my last game was July 5), largely because I couldn't afford my usual 15-20 of seasons past due to the ridiculous increases in ticket prices since McCourt bought the team.

But also I am repulsed at the mess that Frank and Jamie have made here and am thinking very seriously about not going at all anymore until the Dodgers have a new owner. Frank is a greedy conman with absolutely no conscience whose only interest is how much money he can bleed from the team and live the high life.

The unconscionable greed of Frank & Jamie McCourt has ruined the franchise.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...


About L.A. Now
L.A. Now is the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news section for Southern California. It is produced by more than 80 reporters and editors in The Times’ Metro section, reporting from the paper’s downtown Los Angeles headquarters as well as bureaus in Costa Mesa, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, Ventura and West Los Angeles.
Have a story tip for L.A. Now?
Can I call someone with news?
Yes. The city desk number is (213) 237-7847.


Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: