Forest Service investigates withholding of key Station fire information

The U.S. Forest Service has launched an inspector general’s investigation and invited Congress to order a broad inquiry into last summer’s disastrous Station fire, after the recent discovery that dispatch recordings from the critical early hours of the blaze were withheld from The Times and a federal review team.
The inspector general’s probe will focus on why several days worth of recordings were not provided to The Times under the Freedom of Information Act or turned over to a Forest Service inquiry that had concluded the agency’s initial attack on the fire had been proper.
"I find this very serious,” Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell told The Times on Tuesday. “I’m very concerned and troubled that this was not found earlier....We want to get this information to learn what occurred on the Station fire."
Tidwell said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack invited Congress to request the fuller investigation of the Forest Service’s handling of the Station fire, a probe that would be conducted by the Government Accountability Office.
The content of the withheld recordings is not known. Tidwell said officials were still transcribing them and the results would be released in coming days.
He said the recordings were found after he ordered a reexamination of the agency’s response to The Times’ requests for copies of audio dispatch communications.
The news organization had also raised questions about an erroneous entry in one key transcript, which Forest Service officials blamed on a private contractor.
Tidwell said he had wanted the reexamination completed before a local hearing on the Station fire next Tuesday by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank). Schiff scheduled the hearing after The Times reported that the Forest Service had misjudged the threat posed by the fire, scaled back the initial attack and failed to fill crucial orders for air tankers on the second morning.
The Station blaze, which broke out Aug. 26, blackened 250 square miles of the forest, destroyed scores of homes and other structures, and killed two Los Angeles County firefighters. It was the largest fire in county history.
In a statement today, Schiff said he was “concerned with the late discovery of these recorded conversations by the Forest Service, and the fact that these calls appear to have been recorded without the knowledge or consent of some or all of the parties to these calls.
“I hope the Inspector General investigation will get to the bottom of how this recording system was established, for what purpose and under what authorization, as well as whether any laws were violated by it,” the statement said.
A Forest Service spokesman said the inspector general’s office could recommend criminal charges based on what the investigation finds.
No Forest Service employee has been fired or placed on leave since the recordings were unearthed, Tidwell said.
He also said he was not aware of the recordings when he told a Senate committee last spring that the Forest Service had deployed the earliest available air tankers to the fire on the second morning, when the blaze was still just a few acres in size.
According to federal records and state officials, other tankers were available earlier, but the Forest Service failed to complete an order for them.
-- Paul Pringle
Photo: Associated Press








should have just let Ah-nold handle it - he would have done a good job ordering all the hardware. as it stands, this is at best incompetance it should be criminal - its a disrace and horrible how the forest service let this happen - there was a times article featuring many retired forest service people - back i guess when it was a highly professional agency - and they seem to think it was egregious how the whole mountain burned.
Posted by: bill | August 03, 2010 at 04:52 PM
Did I read this correctly? The Forest Service is going to investigation the Forest Service?
Posted by: charlesinoc | August 03, 2010 at 06:04 PM
Thank you Mr. Pringle.
It is becoming clear that this was not a "communication" mistake, but a coverup.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Next up...... why did they let Big Tujunga Canyon burn ? Why were so many homes and animals lost when it could have been avoided ?
Posted by: wake up | August 03, 2010 at 06:39 PM
Keep pushing LA Times! You'll find out who's responsible and make them pay!
Posted by: My opinon means nothing | August 03, 2010 at 06:48 PM
I sure hope all of the information does eventually come out in the open. There was no transparency on the part of the Angeles National Forest Supervisor's office or the USFS Region 5 Fire and Aviation office at the Region HQ in Vallejo. So far the truth still hasn't come out!
Posted by: Norm Silver | August 03, 2010 at 10:41 PM
What the public doesn't know is that the Forest Service fire program is supervised and managed by non-firefighters at critical levels throughout the organization. The Forest Service fire program is lead by non-fire professionals who do not understand fire management. Congress needs to demand an reorganzaition of the Forest Service fire program. If reorganized, we can lower costs of the fire program. Not to many agencies in federal government can reduce costs and ask for less taxpayer dollars. The Forest Service fire program if reorganized will make sure this happens.
Posted by: John | August 05, 2010 at 10:02 PM