L.A. NOW

Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Appeals court orders judge to reverse ban on publishing suspect's photo

A state appellate court ordered a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge Monday to abandon her order barring the Los Angeles Times from publishing images of a man accused of a quadruple homicide or show a compelling reason by Tuesday why the images should not be printed.

Judge Hilleri G. Merritt allowed--then barred--L.A.Times photographer Al Seib from publishing several dozen images taken of defendant Alberd Tersargyan,

Jeff Glasser, an attorney representing The Times, argued in a hearing last week that neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor the California Court of Appeal had ever upheld a prior restraint even when faced with imperatives such as national security, or a competing interest such as the right to a fair trial. He also noted that images of Tersargyan have already been disseminated on television news broadcasts and on the Internet.

Despite decades of 1st Amendment precedent barring prior restraints, Merritt said she was concerned about issues surrounding the ability of witnesses to identify a suspect in the case, interfering with the defendant's right to a fair trial.

Although images of Tersargyan had been made public, pictures showing him wearing a jail jumpsuit in the cage-like lockup area of the courtroom could be more prejudicial to potential witnesses.

Tersargyan is awaiting trial in the killing of a woman in Los Angeles' Little Armenia neighborhood in March. He was charged last week in the 2008 slaying of the woman's husband and 8-year-old daughter, as well as a fatal sniper-style attack this year on a prostitute on Sunset Boulevard.

Before Tersargyan's arraignment, Merritt had approved a written request by Times photographer Al Seib to take pictures of the suspect. Seib notified the court bailiff, the clerk and a spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County district attorney's office.

During the hearing and after Seib had already begun photographing Tersargyan, Los Angeles County Deputy Dist. Atty. Eric Harmon reminded the judge about the prior order.

Harmon told the judge it was possible the pictures could affect witness testimony but also said he did not believe that publishing the pictures would prejudice witnesses.

Tersargyan's defense counsel argued that the pictures could prejudice witnesses although they did not provide concrete examples of the potential harm.

Los Angeles County Superior Court spokesman Allan Parachini said no immediate decision had been made in response to the appeal's court's order.

--Andrew Blankstein

 
Comments () | Archives (2)

Tell the appellate court since when does someone have the right to publish someone else's picture without their permission. Whose 1st Amendment rights are being violated?

Paul. Get a clue on what first amendment rights are. If you had any ANY *ANY* clue you would know that in almost every single case ANYONE can TAKE and PUBLISH a picture of you in public as long as they are not using it to promote a product or service. That means if you are at a park and a photojournalist takes a picture of you, they can use it in a newspaper or similar source without your permission. Gee whiz man, as I photographer, I'm so glad we don't live in your world. I'm taking a picture of you next time I see you and putting it on the internet.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video

About L.A. Now
L.A. Now is the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news section for Southern California. It is produced by more than 80 reporters and editors in The Times’ Metro section, reporting from the paper’s downtown Los Angeles headquarters as well as bureaus in Costa Mesa, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, Ventura and West Los Angeles.
Have a story tip for L.A. Now?
Please send to newstips@latimes.com
Can I call someone with news?
Yes. The city desk number is (213) 237-7847.

Categories




Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: