Roman Polanski: L.A. County district attorney 'surprised and disappointed' by Swiss action
Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley told The Times on Monday that he was "genuinely surprised and disappointed" that Swiss authorities decided not to extradite Roman Polanski to the U.S. to face sentencing for having sex with a teenage girl three decades ago.
Cooley, who led the effort to extradite Polanski years after he fled the U.S. to avoid jail time, said he would have more to say on the matter later Monday. It's unclear what legal options L.A. prosecutors now have in their attempt to bring the famed director back to L.A.
"Mr. Polanski is still convicted of serious child sex charges," Cooley said.
The
Swiss Federal Department of Justice and Police said a flaw in the U.S.
extradition request could not be ruled out and that Polanski, who
maintains a vacation home in Switzerland, could reliably expect not to
be arrested and deported since the U.S. knew of his frequent presence
there over the last few years but never acted on it.
Polanski, 76, has already been released from house arrest, the justice department said.
The director has been in Swiss custody since last September, when police in Zurich arrested him on his arrival in the city to accept a lifetime achievement award at a film festival. The arrest was made at the request of authorities in Los Angeles.
The U.S. lodged a formal extradition request at the end of October. Legal experts said that, by law, Swiss justice officials were obliged to rule on the request only on technical and administrative grounds, examining it to see that all proper procedures were followed, rather than on the actual merits of the case against Polanski.
In its decision Monday, the Swiss justice department said it could not exclude the possibility that the extradition request was "undermined by a serious fault," because the U.S. had failed to turn over certain documents requested by the Swiss with regard to the case.
Specifically, the Swiss wanted to determine whether the 42 days Polanski already served in a Los Angeles jail would have been considered sufficient time served for having sex with a minor.
Also, Swiss authorities said that, until 2009, the U.S. had not filed any extradition request against Polanski "for years," even though U.S. officials knew he had bought a house in Switzerland in 2006 and was a regular visitor there. That gave the director a reasonable expectation that he was not under threat of arrest and deportation from Switzerland.
-- Richard Winton and Henry Chu
Photos: L.A. Times file








This public civil servant, Steve Cooley, is using this case for his own political advantage. I see no advantage to Los Angeles residents in him continuing to pursue a case that is over, dead. The victim wants it dead, L.A. tax payers want it dead, hey Cooley, if you continue to pursue this, your political career needs to be dead.
Posted by: paula | July 13, 2010 at 07:01 AM
Steve, if you want to go after someone who's obstructed the investigation of literally hundreds of child rapes, which are still going on today, pay a visit to Roger Mahony.
Wouldn't that be a better use of our scarce resources than this 33 year old incident?
Posted by: BlessMeFather | July 13, 2010 at 09:00 AM
STOP WASTING OUR TAX DOLLARS ON THIS CASE!!! Cooley is simply trying to get free advertising and publicity for his Atty General run. It's despicable. With all the budget issues, jail overcrowding, and true criminals walking the streets of LA - Roman Polanski is the least of my worries. He is not a threat to the citizens of LA, so move on and deal with the drug dealers and murderers in our community. JEEZ!!!!
Posted by: Brian | July 13, 2010 at 10:19 AM
I post from Switzerland and I would first apologize to readers for my weak english, is not my mother or usual language.
I discovered there some really strange comments about Polanski case and about swiss responsbility. So I would just restore some facts.
1. If Mr Polanski is free today is because U.S. administration of Justice has refused to furnish to swiss administration the necessary elements to justify extradition.
You can consult developments in english under this official link :
http://www.ejpd.admin.ch/ejpd/en/home/dokumentation/mi/2010/2010-07-12.html
2. In Switzerland a person conviced of the same crime as Polanski did, could never had been released after that you call, I guess, a plea bargain. Abuse of children as every crime or offense in Switzerland are not subject to be negociated with justice...! That is not consistent with our principles of democracy.( 42 days ! even as an possible assumption... This is not serious ??? )
So, if some of you are searching the cause or the responsibility explaining why Polanski has never paid for his crime and why is free today, so you have to ask to your own system of justice but to Switzerland please.
Best regards.
A swiss citizen.
Posted by: switzerland | July 16, 2010 at 01:15 PM