L.A. NOW

Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Increased quake activity predicted for California faults

July 9, 2010 |  5:25 pm

There is growing concern among seismologists that the 7.2 Mexicali earthquake April 4 placed more pressure on Southern California's faults, resulting in increased quake activity over the last three months.

The latest evidence was Wednesday's magnitude 5.4 Collins Valley earthquake that rolled from the mountains south of Palm Springs, leaving no major damage but rattling nerves throughout the region.

Wednesday’s quake was centered in the San Jacinto fault zone -- Southern California’s most active -- which runs 100 miles from the border northwesterly toward Riverside and San Bernardino.

Scientists had warned for some time that the Mexicali quake had transferred pressure from the Mexican border area toward the San Jacinto fault and nearby Elsinore fault – which runs 110 miles and could cause major damage in urban areas -- making quakes there more likely.

 “The probability of a larger earthquake on those faults could be high within the next year or two,” said John Rundle, a physics and geology professor at UC Davis.

Rundle said the aftermath of the Mexicali quake is turning out to be significantly different than the aftermath of the two other large quakes to hit Southern California in the last two decades.

Both the 7.3 Landers quake in 1992 and the 7.1 Hector Mine quake in 1999 in the Mojave Desert resulted in aftershocks that dissipated relatively quickly. By contrast, the Mexicali quake has been followed by aftershocks and “triggered earthquakes” that are showing no signs of ending.

 “This thing seems to be popping off with lots of small earthquakes, and it’s not decaying very quickly … which to me is worrisome, frankly,” he said.

Experts are particularly concerned because the northern edges of the Elsinore and San Jacinto fault zones line up, respectively, near the Whittier fault, which runs into Orange and Los Angeles counties, and the San Andreas fault. Both faults could produce catastrophic quakes.

Smaller earthquakes continue at an unexpectedly high level far north of the Mexicali quake in the Inland Empire.

“Under normal circumstances, you have a rather rapid die-off of activity after an earthquake. But in this case, the activity seems to be motoring along at a fairly high level,” Rundle said.

In contrast, Rundle’s analysis shows the probability of a large earthquake -- such as a magnitude 7 -- has decreased closer to the Mexicali quake area, such as near San Diego.

Rundle is involved in research that is looking to take patterns of smaller earthquakes that have occurred after the Mexicali earthquake and using them to forecast probabilities of where larger earthquakes will be.

“You can actually mathematically map the transfer of stress from one fault to another after an earthquake,” Rundle said. “Small earthquakes are a response to the underlying levels of stress. The higher the level of stress, the higher number of small earthquakes one typically finds. We use the patterns of small earthquakes to forecast the occurrence of larger earthquakes.”

Another piece of evidence are science stations that are built on both sides of the earthquake faults. Satellite imagery of those stations show that both sides of the faults are increasingly moving past each other, indicating growing strain.

Andrea Donnellan, a Jet Propulsion Laboratory geophysicist, likened the Mexicali quake to the initial crack in a car’s windshield.

“Over time … it cracks more,” she said. “The cracked head is where the stress is highest, and that will propagate.”

Increased strain on a fault, Donnellan said, looks like a rubber band that is increasingly stretched.

“Stretch it for a while, it will break,” she said.

The observations underscore that earthquake faults need to be looked at as a system -- similar to how weather patterns in Alaska and on the other side of the Pacific Ocean can affect California.

“You can’t look at it in a vacuum. If you look at it from a system perspective where all these faults interact with each other … you can get an idea how a fault can turn on or off an earthquake on another fault,” Donnellan said.

-- Rong-Gong Lin II

Comments 

Advertisement










Video