Judge orders Dodgers' Frank McCourt to pay his wife more than $637,000 a month in spousal support [Updated]
A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has ordered Dodgers owner Frank McCourt to pay his estranged wife, Jamie, $637,159 a month in temporary spousal support, plus lawyers' fees pending their divorce.
The amount that Judge Scott Gordon decided upon falls short of the $988,845 that Jamie McCourt requested. More than half that requested amount ($568,829), her lawyers said, is needed to pay the costs, including mortgages, of seven homes and an eighth piece of property in Mexico that are listed in her name. Her lawyers argued that spousal support should include those costs since her estranged husband used to contribute funds to the housing.
The judge specified that $412,159 of the monthly total should go to payment of costs associated with the properties, but ordered the property in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, to be sold.
In the months since she made her lofty financial request, Jamie McCourt has been vilified in the court of public opinion and in the courtroom -- where her husband's attorney, Sorrell Trope, likened her to Marie Antoinette.
Both sides have agreed in court that the couple has lived lavishly -- "Every need, every want these people had was met," her attorney, Dennis Wasser said -- but they have bitterly disagreed over how Jamie McCourt should sustain that lifestyle during the divorce proceedings.
Her lawyers argued that Frank McCourt has access to $18 million annually and should not withhold from his wife the funds she needs to maintain the lifestyle that they created together.
"They were their houses and the title was just in her name," her civil attorney, Michael Kump, said of the properties after the spousal support hearing in March. "Jamie didn't go out and buy two houses in Holmby Hills and two houses in Malibu.... They bought two houses in Holmby Hills and two houses in Malibu."
Trope, on the other hand, said Frank McCourt, who is living at the Montage Hotel in Beverly Hills, has an annual income of just $5 million, is trying to cut back and could offer his wife $150,000 a month in support.
Trope said the Dodgers franchise was not Frank McCourt's "personal piggy bank" and that Jamie McCourt should rent some of her properties to generate cash.
He also noted that Jamie McCourt had earned a $2-million salary last year as chief executive of the Dodgers. Her lawyers pointed out that she was fired from that job by her husband.
The court filings on spousal support have drawn many curious eyes eager to pore over the details of the couple's life together -- from the descriptions of their houses and their stays in the finest hotels to the personal hairstylists for both husband and wife.
But the spousal support fight is just a small part of the couple's disagreement. The bigger source of conflict -- which could have major consequences outside their marriage -- is over ownership of the Dodgers.
Frank McCourt argues that he alone owns the baseball team. Jamie McCourt says they share ownership. The trial on that issue is scheduled to begin in late August.
--Carla Hall
[Correction: A previous version of this post referred to Superior Court Judge Scott Gordon as a commissioner.]
Photo: Frank and Jamie McCourt at Dodger Stadium.
Credit: Los Angeles Times








If you're a single man and you live in California, DON'T GET MARRIED.
Posted by: Women are leeches | May 07, 2010 at 03:40 PM
At least now he knows what he has to pay here temporarily, so that part is out of the way, for the time being.
Posted by: OldBrooklynFan | May 07, 2010 at 03:51 PM
McCourt...sell the team. This is absurd.
Posted by: So Cal | May 07, 2010 at 03:55 PM
I miss the O'Malley's.
Posted by: Dereck Andrade | May 07, 2010 at 04:11 PM
Nothing like being the cause of the divorce and getting rewarded for it too. Men have no rights. Women always win. I'll never marry again.
Posted by: My opinon means nothing | May 07, 2010 at 04:11 PM
thats alot of money, yikes
Posted by: jj | May 07, 2010 at 04:15 PM
Ummmm , me is remembering the old phrase "cheaper to keep her" .
Possibly applies here !
Not to mention the bazillion $$$$$$$$$$$$ for attorneys .
With that many houses , if you can't get along , you just agree to stay in separate places !
Posted by: kathleen | May 07, 2010 at 04:16 PM
Can we say GREED at its finest. What individual on this planet can live in more than one house at a time, so pick the best and sell the rest, bank the money honey and live on your own.
Posted by: Kim Garrett | May 07, 2010 at 04:18 PM
This woman can get a job, she is a lawyer and made 2 million last year, if she was fired let her apply for unemployment. If she has seven houses she can only live in one,rent the other six. I feel no pain for this greedy woman.
Posted by: ejohnson | May 07, 2010 at 04:26 PM
I am so sick of hearing this!! These two have got to be the most ridiculous pair since Laurel and Hardy. You have this much greed and extravagance, perhaps cut ticket prices so people can actually enjoy a game 2-3 times a season. Must be incredibly nice to have a home, exclusively to do one's laundry!!!! I think it is arrogant, and selfish on each of their part's to air all of this in the media. Finish this once and for all,puh-leez!!!
Posted by: kraftbrat | May 07, 2010 at 04:30 PM
What does this mean to the future of the Dodgers?
Posted by: Ross | May 07, 2010 at 04:39 PM
Poor thing, how WILL she survive???
Posted by: Tee | May 07, 2010 at 04:39 PM
This is what I call a highway to hell.. Greed.
Posted by: NativeAmerican | May 07, 2010 at 04:43 PM
Now these two really need to live in the real world!
Posted by: Paul Revere | May 07, 2010 at 04:55 PM
FOR GODS SAKE, PLEASE SELL THE TEAM! Watching these two clowns fight over Millions while living like royalty, but not investing in the team is so disgusting. I'm a 30 year Dodgers fan, but absolutely will NOT attend another Dodgers game as long as the McCourts own the team.
Posted by: Chris | May 07, 2010 at 05:01 PM
wow $670,000 a month???? Thats 7.6 million a year!!!! No wonder why the Dodgers have no pitching!
Posted by: Carl A. | May 07, 2010 at 05:01 PM
How about the court ordering the McCourts to pay some attention to the Dodgers? Especially the pitching. They could also leave their over-the -hill
fat left fielder in San Bernadino because they have a young kid (Paul) who is
a much better fielder and, can hit. Maybe Frank could spend some of that money he just saved on the team!
Posted by: John Waferling | May 07, 2010 at 05:01 PM
wow, that's it...less than 12mil a year. My guess is he's already cutting the annual check and smiling about.
Posted by: calvin | May 07, 2010 at 05:04 PM
What I'd give for just ONE of those months of spousal support. Heck, I'd be thrilled with the $150K the other side offered.
Posted by: Dee | May 07, 2010 at 05:14 PM
where can i get a job as the ex-wife of a baseball team owner? (i'm male, if that matters).
Posted by: achybreaky | May 07, 2010 at 05:15 PM
How about selling some properties and buying some pitching. I pray that by start of 2011 the Dodgers have owners who want win, not owners primarily interested in seeing how lavishly they can live. The McCourts make me ill.
Posted by: JT | May 07, 2010 at 05:24 PM
who really cares?????
Posted by: bigmikeisathome | May 07, 2010 at 05:25 PM
Hey! I have a great idea! Why don't they each learn to live on a teacher's salary? They can give the rest of the money to homeless shelters, schools, and so on.
Let 'em live on $20K per year like an adjunct professor with a Ph.D., and see how they fare.
Posted by: pcarlson | May 07, 2010 at 05:42 PM
good lord. can i marry him next?
Posted by: bettie | May 07, 2010 at 05:43 PM
Obviously this judge is not a dodger fan.
Posted by: take it easy | May 07, 2010 at 05:48 PM