Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Monterey Bay Aquarium report: Demand for seafood leading to oceans' decline


The Monterey Bay Aquarium has been working for years to improve the health of the planet's oceans, and today it has announced new collaborations to spread the word through chefs, seafood buyers and others.

The aquarium, which is celebrating its 25th anniversary, released a report today on the state of the oceans. Prospects for the oceans are improving with a growing consensus to manage wild and farm fishing, the report says. But it also sets out significant problems that remain for the oceans and cites the human demand for seafood as the primary factor in the oceans' decline.

It also released a "Super Green" list, developed with the Harvard School of Public Health and the Environmental Defense Fund, of seafood that is healthy for people and the planet. On the list are some albacore tuna caught in the U.S. or British Columbia, wild-caught salmon from Alaska and pink shrimp from Oregon, among others.

Another of its efforts is a commitment by some of the country's top chefs -- including Suzanne Goin of Lucques in Los Angeles, Susan Spicer of Bayona in New Orleans, and the Food Network's Alton Brown -- to serve only sustainable seafood and work to persuade other chefs to do the same.

The aquarium is partnering with Santa Monica Seafood, the largest seafood distributor in the region, to help spread the word to its 1,500 chef customers and others, as well as to the people who sell them seafood and to the company's sales force.

And the California Science Center announced a new ecosystems exhibit opening next spring that will include a 188,000-gallon kelp forest, also to be home to fish and other marine life.

The aquarium's report said the world seafood supply was 110 million tons in 2006 -- eight times what it was in 1950, with Asia accounting for more than half the global catch. And in the next year, it said, people will eat more farmed seafood than wild for the first time.

In the last decade, the aquarium has distributed 32 million Seafood Watch cards, pocket guides listing which seafood to avoid because they're caught or farmed unsustainably and which seafood are recommended. The aquarium also has cards that diners can leave on restaurant tables asking that unsustainable seafood not be served.

"We hear back from chefs," says Sheila Brown, outreach manager for Seafood Watch.

"In the last 24 months, there has been an amazing escalation of interest" in sustainable seafood, Brown says. "People are starting to get it."

Today's announcement comes a week after California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a sustainable-seafood bill into law to encourage sustainable-fishing practices in the state and help fishermen market their catch.

-- Mary MacVean

Photo: Monterey Bay Aquarium

More breaking news in L.A. Now:

LAPD detective accused of 1986 slaying seeks dismissal of case

Crews search Cleveland National Forest for missing L.A. County sheriff's deputy

Calabasas man charged with breaking into homes of Lindsay Lohan, Audrina Patridge

Three more main breaks send water, mud spewing into L.A. streets

Comments () | Archives (2)

I thought this was a local paper? Why is the LA Times trekking up to NorCal's Monterey Bay Aquarium when the Aquarium of the Pacific in Long Beach is in the midst of establishing a sustainable seafood partnership with local restaurants? I'm embarassed that I don't remember the details of the program but I'm more embarassed that the LA Times was unable to inform me about it.

This article could use a bit of rewrite to make it more clear and more valuable. To wit, when it says "The aquarium's report said the world seafood supply was 110 million tons in 2006", what is that actually saying. Does that mean that there is 110 million tons of seafood readily available to be caught in the ocean? or does it mean that 'There was 110 million tons of seafood caught in 2006."? When it says that that was 8 times what it was in 1950, is that a good thing or a bad thing? Does that mean that there is more seafood in the ocean or does than mean we are consuming 8 times as much seafood now?

It also later says "In the last decade, the aquarium has distributed 32 million Seafood Watch cards". Wow, it sure would be neat if this was a link to a source for a user to obtain a card or perhaps to be able to see what species are at risk.

Then later it says: "The aquarium also has cards that diners can leave on restaurant tables asking that unsustainable seafood not be served." Is this a way for people to say "I don't want to eat this species and Mr Chef, please do not offer it to the table next to me even if that person does want it."? How about just educating rather than trying to prevent others from doing what you might be choosing to not do?


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...


About L.A. Now
L.A. Now is the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news section for Southern California. It is produced by more than 80 reporters and editors in The Times’ Metro section, reporting from the paper’s downtown Los Angeles headquarters as well as bureaus in Costa Mesa, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, Ventura and West Los Angeles.
Have a story tip for L.A. Now?
Please send to newstips@latimes.com
Can I call someone with news?
Yes. The city desk number is (213) 237-7847.


Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: