Station fire was arson, officials say; homicide investigation begins
The Station fire has been classified as an arson fire, and authorities have launched a homicide investigation.
The massive blaze, which killed two firefighters, has been under investigation for days, with the focus being on a road turnout along Angeles Crest Highway north of La Cañada Flintridge.
“Forensic examination has led this team effort to conclude … that it was an act of arson," said Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department spokesman Steve Whitmore.
The Station fire, which has burned about 144,000 acres of the Angeles National Forest, is the largest fire in L.A. County history. Two firefighters died Sunday during a rescue effort, when their vehicle plunged down a mountain.
On Wednesday, investigators hunched under a scorched, 20-foot-tall oak tree off Angeles Crest Highway, using wire mesh sifters to search through the ash in an attempt to determine whether the Station fire was deliberately set.
Near Mile Marker 29, authorities were treating the fire's suspected ignition site as a crime scene. Yellow tape cordoned off the area and authorities blocked the highway, turning away even Caltrans workers and earthmovers. Members of the bomb squad also arrived at the scene but officials declined to say what their role was in the probe.
"We believe it is the point of origin," Los Angeles County Fire Capt. Mike McCormick said Wednesday. "They are doing a finely detailed, serious, serious search and investigation. We lost two firefighters in this."
-- Ari B. Bloomekatz
| Photos: Wildfires | High-res | Mapped | Interactive map: The Station fire |
Manager of church-run Camp Colby assesses fire losses, and saves
Firefighters wage 5-day battle to save Mt. Wilson Observatory
Gold Canyon residents who refused to evacuate survive Station fire
Firefighters are warned to lay off energy drinks
Twitter: Follow @latimescitydesk | @latimesfires



why is it called "the station fire"
Posted by: andy | September 03, 2009 at 06:20 PM
If they catch this person, he deserves the death penalty!
Posted by: Shawn | September 03, 2009 at 06:26 PM
Arson?
Posted by: Raul Garcia | September 03, 2009 at 06:56 PM
This is *government* at its finest! Support our professional AND publicly funded fire fighters, cops, air traffic experts, meteorologists (AQMD and NOAA) and civic leaders.
Roll back Prop 13!
Posted by: mv | September 03, 2009 at 07:00 PM
Mike Davis, Ecology of Fear. "Ignition is irrelevant." Was it arson in Palos Verdes? Where are all the East Coast Arsonists?
Posted by: SMRR | September 03, 2009 at 07:24 PM
It's called the "Station" fire because it started near a Forest Service Ranger Station, I think.
Posted by: bckm | September 03, 2009 at 07:59 PM
Andy, it started near the ranger station and Shawn i couldnt agree more. they should burn the idiot at the stake.
Posted by: D | September 03, 2009 at 07:59 PM
@SSMR - Have you ever been out of California? The East Coast is humid and gets a lot of rain. The forests don't burn as easily and readily as they do out here because it's a completely different ecosystem and climate.
Posted by: Jamie from PA | September 03, 2009 at 08:16 PM
I wonder why all this stuff seems to happen in California, especially LA County.
Posted by: Kai- | September 03, 2009 at 08:23 PM
Good call, bckm. I'm going to dust off Ecology of Fear between now and the mudslides to follow.
Posted by: G. Friday | September 03, 2009 at 08:43 PM
why is it called the station fire?
Posted by: steve | September 03, 2009 at 09:01 PM
its the station fire because it was first spotted from a ranger station.
Posted by: jessica | September 03, 2009 at 09:12 PM
California, especially Southern California, has been enduring a drought for the last couple of years which has made it very susceptible to fires. LA County is filled with a lot of rugged, wild natural areas so that combined with the dryness of the region are a factor. The one positive thing about this is that at least this did not happen when the Santa Anas were blowing or this could have been much, much worse. That said, God bless those courageous firefighters and my prayers go out to the families of those who died.
Posted by: vivalakres | September 03, 2009 at 09:14 PM
At some point, I think, we're going to experience these fires as terrorist acts.
Posted by: Joe Shea | September 03, 2009 at 09:23 PM
wait guys so why is it called the station fire?
Posted by: bob | September 03, 2009 at 10:00 PM
"...wait guys so why is it called the station fire?..."
It is common practice to name incidents to prevent confusion on the radio between different incidents that may be near-by each other. Names are usually drawn from geographical references (i.e. the "Morris Fire" started near Morris Dam) to simplify the process and prevent unpronounceable or personal names. In this case the original report was of a brush fire located 1/2 mile above the Angeles Crest Ranger Station. The ranking officer responding picked "Station" as the name to shorten it up. It could have just as easily been called the "Angeles Fire" - but since you are on the Angeles National Forest it probably already had been used, or the the "Ranger Fire" but that doesn't quite sound right, so "Station" was probably the first option that met the incident naming criteria.
Posted by: Geoff Wilford | September 03, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Last year there was a ranger station on the eastern side of the Sierras near Bishop that was burned down -- arson too. What is up with all the crazies going after the Forest Service?!
Posted by: Fiona | September 04, 2009 at 01:09 AM
Interesting. A previous L.A. Times blog, from August 16, 2009, is titled "Huge Santa Barbara County wildfire caused by marijuana farm; suspects at large in forest". Link: http://tinyurl.com/p978zx -- the article states ""The Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Narcotics Unit has confirmed that the camp at the origin of the fire was an illegal marijuana operation believed to be run by a Mexican national drug organization," according to a statement from the Los Padres National Forest. "The Narcotics Unit has been working in the area within the last month eradicating other nearby marijuana cultivation sites."
Of course, there could be multiple ignition points for this fire, with the fires merging into the one big "Station" blaze. But, if so, isn't it interesting that most news stories coming out now say that it's arson, and nothing is mentioned about the cartel-run marijuana plantations and the probable cause being a cooking fire in one of these encampments. Can you say "coverup"?
Posted by: Doug | September 04, 2009 at 06:44 AM
I say let's find the arsonist, and put him in a room with the rest of the firefighters who fought the fire.
Whatever happens, happens....
Posted by: Kevin | September 04, 2009 at 08:27 AM
Boy, there sure are a lot of conspiracy theorists out there. These people are so out of touch with reality it's laughable. There have been numerous wildfires in recent years in the western U.S. The wildfires in Colorado, Utah, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona? Are those places close to L.A.? Idiots! Now it's a coverup for the USFS burning out a marijuana plantation? Haven't you watched any TV news coverages when they've uncovered them? They cut them down, helicopter them to a safe location, then burn them. Idiots! Whay do idiots even expose themselves for what they are by commenting and revealing how ignorant they are? I guess that's what idiots do.
Posted by: Tony | September 04, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Jamie,
That's the point, you fool. We shouldn't be building new residential development in tinderboxes. Shouting 'arson' is absurd, the area is a natural fire hazard. It doesn't matter what started it, it is the fact that any errant flame will create an inferno that envelopes the area.
Posted by: SMRR | September 05, 2009 at 09:42 PM