IOUs provoke new concerns, anger among Californians
With the announcement that the state was preparing to issue 28,742 IOUs worth $53.3 million this afternoon, some Californians said the gesture was a little too late.
“It's candy for a hungry man,” said Richard Blitz. “Banks will accept it for a week or two, but what will happen after that?”
The 73-year-old Westside resident said he believes the state’s financial crisis could have been avoided if there was better leadership, and he thinks things will only get worse.
“In ‘92 they had people that compromised,” said Blitz, recalling the last time the state issued IOUs to residents. “Not now, [legislators] don’t care. Maybe they want the state to go bankrupt.”
Blitz, the owner of a downtown variety store said raising taxes won’t help either. “If you have to raise taxes, raise taxes but do it right,” said Blitz, owner of Farmacia Million Dollar on Broadway. “Don’t go to the bottom line, people who are living hand to mouth.”
Paula Joliette, said she relies on her Social Security payments to live, but she thinks people taking advantage of the state is beginning to catch up financially.
“To tell you the truth, California is overrun by people in certain areas. This state pays more money [for disability],” said the West Adams resident in her late 60s. “Everyone is on the California bandwagon to get their money. You have some people saying they are mentally ill when they aren’t. They can live good off of that money.”
Joliette said she is concerned for her son who teaches in Fresno because he’s gotten IOUs for an entire month’s salary on multiple occasions.
While Joliette said the funds she receives from the state have been only minimally reduced, the issuance of IOUs is a relief to some, such as Tannis Carr, who said her reserves have become smaller and smaller. For her the damage is done.
“My SSI has been cut to hell and back,” said the 65-year-old retired postal worker. “This month it was $20 less, the same the month before that. It makes me feel like I don’t have anything.” Carr, like Blitz and Joliette, said she doesn’t think the IOUs will mean anything to people because they might have written the state off the same way she has.
She said she worries for her children because they rely on welfare and those benefits could be cut by the state. “It makes me very disappointed. [Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger] seems like he went after anything that poor people needed. This is not going to get any better. I just don’t believe it. I’m thinking one day I may have to leave here.”
--Gerrick Kennedy




This is what you get when you have one party dominate both state chambers compounded by the fact that benefit recipients & public employees essentially command members of the state senate & assembly on public policy. We are a magnet for welfare & public employment. WHat about the private sector?
Posted by: Right To Work State | July 02, 2009 at 03:10 PM
I will vote down any tax increase. I am not going to pay for illegals to be here. Any article that doesn't mention the drain on the economy by the illegals is a lie.
There are things CA can do to discourage illegals, like stop giving free health care etc.. to send them back to their own countries. They can forget "immigration reform/amnesty", start using the ICE net , instead of allowing them to use the safety net.
And roll back union pay and perks. Tighten the rules that allow someone like Partks to retire, collect his former salary, and go back to work for the city and earn a paycheck too.
Posted by: carla123 | July 02, 2009 at 03:41 PM
why are her kids on welfare? Why is she on SSI? If she's a retired postal worker, shouldn't she have a pension (assuming "retired" really means "retired")? She's worried about her kids on welfare? How about her helping her kids get a job? What a novel concept. Given that they are on welfare, I doubt they are highly skilled, and low skill jobs abound, even in this economy. When will CA do it's budget right so that no one is "entitled" to anything? Welcome to the third world. We've arrived.
Posted by: Michae, MPA | July 02, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Unbelievable ... someone with her hand out complaining about too many people with their hands out!!!!!
Posted by: LeftCoastCurmudgeon | July 02, 2009 at 04:01 PM
People should be angry. Businesses and poor people are being punished while state workers, backed by the ridiculously powerful SEIU union, continue to bleed the state coffers dry. Where are their damn IOUs. And the CHP just voted themselves in INCREASE in the middle of all of this - again.
It is high time Californians wake up to the reality that public employee unions are in control of Sacramento and are choking the State, and us, to death. We need a proposition to abolish them, or at least to permanently and absolutely prohibit them from making political contributions. Why are unions necessary for a PUBLIC employer?
Posted by: marcschaefer | July 02, 2009 at 04:06 PM
The lawmakers in Sacramento and their staffs should be paid in IOUs until they pass a budget.
Posted by: independent voter 15 | July 02, 2009 at 04:26 PM
This is for the guy who made the comment about the retired postal worker beng on welfare.You should not be so quick to judge.You dont know this lady ,or other circumstances in her life.Until you have walked a mile in a mans shoes.you have no right to judge.Because Im sure yoiu have your own skeletons in the closet.Plus nobody cares about your opinion anyways .thats life.
Posted by: jennifer | July 02, 2009 at 04:31 PM
As a general rule we give way too much for too many. Its time to fix the revenue problem and stop spending. We have a major issue with tax and spend. Our lovely Democraticly held house loves to take and give (thinking they're RobinHood...unfortunutly their just a bunch of hoods). When over 50% of the State is taking and not giving into the system we have a Major problem.....
Posted by: sstaff | July 02, 2009 at 04:35 PM
Poor people are killing the state.
Posted by: Josie | July 02, 2009 at 04:36 PM
Cost to the California taxpayer for the Iraq and Afghanistan war.
One hundred and seventeen BILLION and climbing 2002 to current.spending 2009.
Its not welfare moms you have to worry about its the defence department.
Posted by: Dig Deep | July 02, 2009 at 04:37 PM
What about the children?
Posted by: thecanimalshusband | July 02, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Hmmm. This example suggests some cuts may be in order.
I am a lilberal and certainly agree that some people need disability, but this example raises questions. CA employee benefit structure is also out of control. Chopping is in
order there also. I took the budget balancing challenge and had little trouble balancing the budget. It was easy
Posted by: Eric Pfeiffer | July 02, 2009 at 04:38 PM
We need the Governor and the Legislators to step up and show some leadership or we may soon be known as the WEST TOAST.
Posted by: Andy Bales | July 02, 2009 at 04:38 PM
The last part of the story says it all. A postal worker on SSI complaining her kids aren't making enough on welfare?!? How about an article featuring all us poor responsible buggers who go to work ever day, paying taxes instead of defrauding the system, braving the overcrowded highways - all to provide for illegal gang bangers, freeloaders, losers, mental midgets, derelicts, criminals, failing schools, playboy mayors, idiot state senators, and pregnant 14 year old dropouts. Responsible American citizens have had enough and are leaving in droves....especially with the sales tax in LA County at almost 10% - who in private business can survive? Taxes are going up as businesses pass on their increased costs to us consumers. No, I'm taking my money and moving. California has lost its luster, and is now colon-blow...swirling faster in the toilet bowl as it approaches the bottom. Liberals and political have bankrupted this state for years and the bill has finally arrived! Enjoy what's left...a Tijuana megatropolis!!!!
Posted by: Heavy D | July 02, 2009 at 04:47 PM
Hmm . . . I don't hear anyone talking about the elephant in the room . . . Arnold Schwarzenegger! I have a funny feeling this paper likes the man's policies.
Posted by: Scott | July 02, 2009 at 04:50 PM
According to the Franchise Tax Board records, the top 4% of income earners pay 63% of all income taxes collected. The bottom 50% pay no tax (and this only counts people working "above" the table). You can't have a state rely on so few people to support and subsidize so many. It's time for ALL Californians to pick themselves up and support themselves.
Posted by: andy in pasadena | July 02, 2009 at 05:02 PM
You voted for an I_diot you got I-diot results.
Posted by: Bob Dole | July 02, 2009 at 05:11 PM
What's up with this State - where's the leadership? It seems like we've been going through this forever, with our legislature. If I operated like this, I would be fired instantly. For some reason, it's acceptable to have our elected officials operate in this manner....?!
Posted by: Dean | July 02, 2009 at 05:16 PM
THE ECONOMICS OF WAR. DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS? IT MEANS THAT THE RICH WILL GET RICHER AND THE POOR WILL GET EVEN POORER UNTIL YOU STOP THE FIGHTING.
Posted by: ESTELLA DAVIS | July 02, 2009 at 05:25 PM
Why does CA have to take care of everyone? It seems to me like CA is just enabling the poor to stay poor. If the poor doesn't want to be poor, then build a life like the wealthy have. The only reason we have wealthy is because they made a life for themselves. They should be congratulated, not used as an ATM machine for the people who choose not to change their situation. Only when you lose the security net will you truly dig in, find your true potential and build a better life for yourself. Kill the welfare, increase student aid and let the poor go back to school on a school loan to learn how not to be poor. That way we have more contributing to society instead of bilking it.
Posted by: RB | July 02, 2009 at 05:38 PM
She has the right idea ... she might and SHOULD move. This state is filled with the indigent ... while states like the Dakotas have hundreds of low-skill jobs waiting for people just like this woman. If we want to help people and reduce the pressures on the state budget, we should subsidize moving these people to areas of the country where housing is affordable and jobs are available. This is the free market doing exactly what it should -- motivating people to move away from economically untenable situations.
Posted by: Please Do Move ... | July 02, 2009 at 05:48 PM
I will vote down any taxes too. People are worried about their kids who are on welfare ?!. Why don't the kids have a job. This is what happens when California tries to tax , provide welfare checks and pay 100k + for fire fighters. Talk about the salaries of state employees, police and fire fighters .. the state problems will worsen if everyone feel this enttiled. No amount of tax is going to be enough.
Posted by: Welfare State | July 02, 2009 at 05:49 PM
California has 12% of the country's population, but 32% of the nation's welfare recipients. Do the math. Of course we're going bankrupt.
Posted by: Tommy D | July 02, 2009 at 05:56 PM
Grover Norquist is a god! Just ask the previous 3 posters and, apparently, the L.A. Times. Who cares about an oath of office when you have a pledge to Grover Norquist the god?
Posted by: GodLoving | July 02, 2009 at 06:27 PM
I'm sure glad I don't live in California. Texas also has a large illegal population. We have no State Income Tax,many prisons and alot of welfare... and... a 9 Billion dollar surplus. Know why? DRILL BABY DRILL.... gas and oil...lots of it.... we have it and so does California.
Posted by: Lady Texan | July 02, 2009 at 06:37 PM
Obviously, California is broke. But it's also broken. The state is living beyond its means, and until that gets fixed, this mess will continue. You can only cut spending so far. Here in Ontario, we tried unpaid days off (called 'Rae Days' after Bob Rae, the Premier at the time), and it did no good at all. Taxes had to go up while some spending was cut. From here, it looks like California needs someone to go into Sacramento and clean up the mess in a similar way. I'm not applying: it won't pay well, and I don't take funny money.
Posted by: Doug in Toronto | July 02, 2009 at 06:57 PM
and the band plays on...
Posted by: al | July 02, 2009 at 07:09 PM
No one who takes welfare should be allowed to have kids. Period. Don't give me any human rights stories, I've had it. I'm tired as hell of paying for this. Don't even get me started on Octo-mom. Women who take medi-cal should have a drug test and a mandatory birth control pill once a month. No pill/positive test, no check. Period! If you want to have a kid, you have to earn it!. Get yourself in a state supported school, get an education, get a job, get off welfare. Now you've earned it. Have as many kids as you want. Kids of illegals are legal if they're born here? No way. No way. They are sucking our system dry. I am so sick of the la times love fest with the "tax takers".
Posted by: Karen | July 02, 2009 at 07:18 PM
I know a 50 year old man in San Mateo who has been living off the public dole for almost two decades. Just freeloadoading and gaming the system-- he's perfectly healthy, but sees a shrink once a month to justify a fake "impairment" and go on to recieve $1200 a month social benefits plus free apartment! The slacker doens't even work, drives one fancy car after the other (last ones were Mustang, Camero, Dodge hemi) which he hides from social service workers and uses to chase girls around. This dude's day consists of buying, gas, fast food, and chasing filipino prostitutes around the peninsula, to the benefit of public heath I may add too. I recently learned he's got his Chinese girlfriend (who is totally capable of working department stores - as she did previsouly) -- nursing on the public teat too (she claimed so imaginary psychiatric disorder).
California - you are liberal, communist, activist filth who refuse to take personal responsibility, exploit social services, and undermine the entire system. No smpathy here.
Posted by: Carl | July 02, 2009 at 07:36 PM
this is only the begining this is going to be worst
Posted by: danilo | July 02, 2009 at 07:39 PM
A lot of people feel these cuts propose by the Govenor will not affect them. Everyone will be affected. People need to think how this will hurt or help them, their families and friends before they said make the cuts and don't raise taxes.
Posted by: ann | July 02, 2009 at 08:39 PM
it has been known for decades to dump the disabled in California. I personally know of 2 cases who left states with lesser benefits who moved to California. I have never in all my life been in a state where i have met so many able-bodied collecting benefits.....your social workers are doing you in.....it is funny.
Posted by: Timray | July 02, 2009 at 09:03 PM
These days I'd be afraid to depend on a welfare check. If you are able to work get a job. I'd be embarrassed to say my kids are on welfare, why mention it at all.
Posted by: dee | July 02, 2009 at 10:11 PM
As a native born Californian, I say let California go bust. This may be the only way to get get the leaching illegals to go back to their own county since our useless Government does not care about upholding US laws and protecting her own legal citizens.
Posted by: AmericanCaliGirlbyBirthright! | July 03, 2009 at 05:32 AM
California has financial problems because the majority of its residents receive more in services, especially entitlements like Medi-Cal, than they pay in taxes. The few % who are wealthy cannot support the 15 million who are poor. Most so-called poor people with their cash aid, subsidized rent, food stamps, free medical, etc. have a higher standard of living and more disposable income than many working people.
I have worked in private industry and for the schools and government. I had a coworker at UPS years ago. She had been on welfare temporarily for 6 months, when her husband was sent to prison. She did NOT want the welfare lifestyle, and applied as a temporary Christmas driver. She said it was one of the hardest things she had to do, because her take home pay, working 50+ hours a week, minus her childcare expense, was SO MUCH LESS than her welfare grant, that she could not afford to buy a tree or presents for her kid that year BECAUSE SHE WAS WORKING.
Well, she worked hard enough and impressed management enough in a few weeks and was rehired as a full time driver after the 1st of the year. She is now happily married to a fellow driver, they own a home, and she has a good life.
All because she WANTED to work and not be on welfare.
I have also worked for the schools and for the social services dept (Medi-Cal). I have seen so many illegal aliens, and so many lazy, conniving citizens line up to receive benefits, commit fraud, and milk the system.
Due to California's propensity to sue every govt program (ACLU, immigrants "rights" groups,etc), all of our public assistance programs have been screwed up. Too many Non-Poor receive benefits due to special treatment of income and property.
Example: Family of 5. Mom and 4 kids receive SS survivors benefits. Sneede/Gamma lawsuits apply, so each child has their own mini-case. 2 older children work, their income is exempted. Under 1931b Medi-Cal rules, $240 and 1/2 of mom's earned job income is deducted. The family had $72,000 a year in income, less than 1/2 earned. But all 5 persons receive FREE zero share of cost Medi-Cal due to division, exemption and exclusion of income in the mnicases.
The mom lost her job, got another lower paying job. Family income dropped to $60,000/year. Mom claims to have an emergency, wants emergency appointment. Why? Because her cell phone is going to be cut off for nonpayment. Too much texting, downloading, long distance? At any rate, this adamant, demanding client COULD NOT accept the fact that there was no public assistance program that would pay her large overdue cell phone bill. The client INSISTED that THERE MUST BE A PROGRAM TO COVER THIS. Her family income was $60,000/year, free Medi-Cal to boot, and she expected the rest of us taxpayers to pay her cell phone bill!
THAT is what is wrong with California. Too many people think that the government should pay for most, if not all of their living expenses. Not just their needs, but their WANTS.
That's why we're going broke here, folks.
Posted by: jsc | July 04, 2009 at 01:50 PM
the abuse is everywhere, in every sector. i remember living in an apartment with several brothers and sisters - we were poor, but we never sought public assistance. our neighbors on the other hand - 9+ kids, family on welfare - do the math. whether its welfare milking, health costs, a broken education system filled with broken students with little drive enough to even graduate from high school - you name it. state employees and municipal employees are notorious milkers as well. ever hear of near-retirees filing disability claims? disability pay plus full-pay! it happens all the time. this state needs to go broke. wall-street won't lower our rating any further because it isn't in its interest. this endless waste will continue for a long time because there is too much at stake to remove the bandage and let it bleed.
Posted by: hotelcalifornia | July 10, 2009 at 01:35 PM