Beverly Hills group says Hilton expansion OKd with help of phony voters
Beverly Hills residents opposed to the Beverly Hilton Hotel's expansion said that a five-month investigation had uncovered more than 550 instances of voting irregularities from the November election when voters narrowly authorized the project by approving Measure H.
But the opposition group declined to reveal any evidence of what it called "illegal and fraudulent" voting.
"Over 550 people voted or tried to vote in Beverly Hills who do not reside in the city," Larry Larson, treasurer of the Citizens Right to Decide Committee, the opposition group, said on the steps of Beverly Hills City Hall. He lifted a 3-inch-thick binder that he said was filled with "illegal voters' names and their legal addresses" and said he planned to send copies of the information this week to California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown and Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley.
In a statement, Mayor Nancy Krasne called on the two officials to conduct investigations and prosecute "both those who voted illegally and those who encouraged them to do so."
Larson said the allegedly phony voters were "related to vocal proponents of the Hilton expansion." He contended that their votes might have affected the election results.
Corinne Verdery, senior vice president of Oasis West Realty, said in a statement that the allegations "have nothing to do with the Beverly Hilton or the Measure H campaign." Hilton owner Beny Alagem is chairman of Oasis West.
"The people of Beverly Hills have spoken ... and supported this project," Verdery said.
-- Martha Groves



This smells like there are a great number of unemployed attorneys in Beverly Hills.One would hope there's no chaff in California.
The alternative lies in those hotels closest to the Hilton. No one would suspect they might have an interest in preventing expansion.Or would they?
Posted by: bill cormeny | June 02, 2009 at 07:58 AM
I've actually seen it happen first hand where developers bring in paid people who have absolutely no stake in a project to vote or make statements in favor of a project. No news here. However, if they actually committed voter fraud, that's a serious issue, considering the vote was extremely close.
Posted by: Robert | June 02, 2009 at 09:34 AM
Gee, the article would have been a lot better if it indicated what the vote was. Was it close - was it within 550 votes? 100 votes? In other words, are we just spinning our wheels here, for lack of information? -art
Posted by: Art in San Clemente | June 02, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Measure H passed by 129 votes.
Posted by: Matthew Thomason | June 02, 2009 at 01:43 PM